578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

Just want to tell that it will become more popular.

585412634[/snapback]

Linux is open source, yet pales in popularity to Windows.

And if you even say the word monopoly, have you ever considered that a social (not financial) monopoly is what Mozilla is in the process of gaining?

And this.....

http://operawatch.blogspot.com/2005/01/opera-or-firefox.html

Opera or Firefox?

By Yakov Shafranovich

With my interest in Linux and other OSS programs, I had people ask me why I use Opera as my web browser instead of an OSS alternative such as . Therefore I wanted to take a few lines to describe why I picked Opera over Firefox, and some of the things that I would like to see in Opera.

PRO #1 - SPEED!!!!!!

Opera is by far faster than Firefox or any other browser I had ever used [with exception of lynx of course :) ]. Even with optimizations, Firefox still takes longer on my machine, both in Linux and Windows. And its not even the page rendering that is faster, even the menus and the rest of the GUI is much faster in Opera than Firefox, which I suspect is due to the use of XUL in Firefox.

PRO #2 - IMAGES OFF BUTTON

Opera is the only browser that I know that allows to disable viewing of images (or partial viewing) on page by page basis. For someone who often works over slow dialup or wireless links, this is a godsend.

PRO #3 - STRICT JAVASCRIPT

While it may sound funny, but Opera seems to have to follow the Javascript standard much closer than any other browser. Case in point - the fact that Gmail does not work in Opera since the XmlHttpRequest object required by Gmail is not part of any standard. Being a web developer among other things, I use Opera for my JavaScript testing for that specific reason. Additionally, Opera seems to pick up the exact line locations of JavaScript errors EVEN on pages were both IE and Firefox failed to do so.

CON #1 - PRETTY BAD PLUGIN INTERGRATION

I don't know why but Opera seems to have pretty bad way with plugins. Java seems pretty slow in both Linux and Windows, Adobe's PDF reader doesn't work at all, and Flash works without sound on Linux. Additionally, for some reason extensions are not as nicely integrated into the Opera GUI as Firefox. For example, I happen to be using Chris Pederick's Web Developer extension for Firefox which integrates very nicely into the browser. Every comparable Opera extension messed up the GUI so badly that I couldn't use it.

CON #2 - HARD TO USE JAVASCRIPT CONSOLE

For programmers and web developers this is pretty important. Unlike Firefox and Mozilla Suite, Opera's Javascript console is pretty hard to work with being that it is a popup window that covers the page. On Linux especially it is even more difficult since the "minimize" option doesn't always work. I would love to see something like Firefox's console which can be optionally hidden away and simply display an icon when something goes wrong.

CON #3 - Better popup blocking GUI

I really like Firefox's popup blocker as well as Google's. What Opera's popup blocker is missing is ability to unblock popups for a single site. Come on guys, even IE (XP SP2) has that now!

---

Yakov Shafranovich is a co-founder and software architect with SolidMatrix Technologies, Inc., a software development and consulting company targeting the service industry. He is actively involved with the design and development of large-scale applications utilizing XML and other Internet standards. Yakov is also active in the Internet community as an individual member of the New York chapter of the Internet Society (ISOC-NY) and a member of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). He served as a co-chair of the Anti-Spam Research Group (ASRG) of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) from August 2003 until May 2004.

Feel free to do so, might make Opera a bit more popular. (N)

585417919[/snapback]

Now if we do that then what difference would there be between sensible opera users and idiotic fanboys like you who use a browser just because its popular and not because it does what u want it to ? Opera does all that i want and the way that i want it.. thats why i use it. I didnt choose opera because it was popular or not popular.

I have done my own research on the differences between the two...and there are alot of valid points everyone has brought up.

My decision:

Sorry Opera. But I see NO reason what so ever, to have to pay to get online with my ISP, then have to pay again to use a browser. Just getting on the internet is expensive enough.

Firefox is in it's infancy still....and yet it's a very powerful browser. I will continue to support the Mozilla foundation in it's efforts to keep the browser free...and yeah, check out the Moox versions of Firefox.

Firefox is Mozilla, << removed >>. Your diploma mustn't be very good, as you can't see that it's called MOZILLA Firefox.

I mean......your posts are the dumbest things that I have read today....if I had less self control and was a little more tired I'd probably tell you to << removed >>.

Instead, I'm going to recommend for you to sue the Education establishment.

585406244[/snapback]

I know that << removed >>. It's << removed >> like you that really give these boards a bad name. Just because 2 cars come off the same assembly line doesn't make them the same car. << removed >>.

Edited by markjensen
Opera may be faster than a standard Firefox distro but maybe you Opera lovers should check out www.moox.ws and see an optomized Firefox build :D

585418038[/snapback]

I have, and while they are faster, XUL still holds Firefox back.
Firefox is in it's infancy still....and yet it's a very powerful browser.  I will continue to support the Mozilla foundation in it's efforts to keep the browser free...and yeah, check out the Moox versions of Firefox.

585418085[/snapback]

Stop posting misinformation, PLEASE people. Firefox as a product is in it's infancy (sort of), yes. But the code itself is NOT. The code is or should be at a mature stage.
I know that << removed >>.  It's << removed >> like you that really give these boards a bad name.  Just because 2 cars come off the same assembly line doesn't make them the same car. << removed >>.

585418119[/snapback]

No. But a Ford F150 and Ford F350 are based off the same designs and components.

Sorry Opera.? But I see NO reason what so ever, to have to pay to get online with my ISP, then have to pay again to use a browser.? Just getting on the internet is expensive enough.

585418085[/snapback]

So you use Linux, right? After all, there's no reason what so ever to have to pay to buy your computer and then have to pay again to use it.

On a side note, i wish they'd hurry up with Opera 8 already. :(

On a side note, i wish they'd hurry up with Opera 8 already. :(

585420696[/snapback]

Not long to wait, the end of Feburary is the expected release date.

Opera may be faster than a standard Firefox distro but maybe you Opera lovers should check out www.moox.ws and see an optomized Firefox build :D

585418038[/snapback]

Didn't really notice a difference... Care to enlighten me?

Sorry Opera.  But I see NO reason what so ever, to have to pay to get online with my ISP, then have to pay again to use a browser.  Just getting on the internet is expensive enough.

So you are saying that everything related to the Internet should be free because you pay for access? In other words, when you order something from an online store, it should send you the stuff for free since you don't want to pay for anything?

Firefox is in it's infancy still....and yet it's a very powerful browser.

Firefox is definitely not in its infancy. It's built on technology which is several years old and has several released products available, and Firefox itself has been in development for a long time (two to three years).

But perhaps you don't remember Phoenix or Firebird... Or you conveniently "forget" about it because it allows you to spread FUD about other browsers.

Opera may be faster than a standard Firefox distro but maybe you Opera lovers should check out www.moox.ws and see an optomized Firefox build :D

585418038[/snapback]

Not only do I notice very little difference myself, it turns out actually even buggier than the original Firefox itself.

Thanks for providing the worst 3 minutes of browsing time I've ever had.

I'd rather stick with the standard version of Firefox.

Firefox, enough said

585427187[/snapback]

You're absoultely right when you said "enough said".

That one post was "enough said" to show that your opinion is worthless and invalid in this discussion.

dont listen to these idiots

opera loads faster, opens sites faster, uses less ram, uses less cpu, has mouse gestures, etc etc etc

its way better than firefox

these trolls love firefox cause its free and open source

584793279[/snapback]

:yes: Totally. I've been sold on Opera for 3 years now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!