Firefox 1.0 November 9th


Recommended Posts

better countdown: http://mrgavins.f2o.org/countdown.php

:D

584889053[/snapback]

to bad I can't stay up that long! It already 10:49 in EST and boy I still have math homework to do. I've been draging out the whole night waiting for ff to come but that wont happen till morning and my parents won't let me use my computer in the morning so i'll get it around 3 pm :angry:

I can't wait any longer :cry:

to bad I can't stay up that long! It already 10:49 in EST and boy I still have math homework to do. I've been draging out the whole night waiting for ff to come but that wont happen till morning and my parents won't let me use my computer in the morning so i'll get it around 3 pm  :angry:

I can't wait any longer  :cry:

584889118[/snapback]

dude.. really, its a browser... what are you waiting for.. to see if neowin looks different in firefawks 1.0? lol

owned.

It's a browser? Firefox is ONE OF THE BEST things to happen to the Web development and security areas of the world. Web developers got tired of the lack of support for W3C specs in IE (which constituted a new IE version that never came) and normal end-users got tired of ActiveX controls causing their computers to be infected with viruses, trojans and spyware (yes, I know it can be disabled, but it is too much work to mess with...)

Firefox has security settings tweaked to the best possible combination for the average end-user and the lack of ActiveX support further helps avoid spyware, viruses and trojans from automatically being installed on a computer. This is why I converted, and I'm only 17 (almost)! Honestly, security is more important than an abundance of options (which are too technical for the average end-user) and an abundance of buttons on a toolbar. Firefox has a built-in Google searchbar to differentiate between URLs and search queries whereas IE uses the address bar to search MSN(too many adverts, the popups - which are also taken care of by Firefox - are a turnoff) if and only if no URLs pertaining to the query are found quickly.

My final words in this post:

Love Firefox like you love your family and Firefox will keep you secure as a gift to you. Love IE like you love your family and IE will install spyware as a gift to you.

Sorry that it's Nov. 10, 2004 for you gentlemen (and ladies and children)! Where I am, it is Nov. 08, 2004 10:55PM CST (22:55 (-6:00)). Using GMT.... Nov. 09, 2004 4:55 GMT ?? Since there are 4 hours left, I'll get mine in the morning (I'm going to sleep soon). Nov. 9, 2004 1AM PST (1:00 (-8:00)) and Nov. 9, 2004 9AM GMT (9:00 (+0:00))?? I think that's right. Well, good night!

Its out!

w0000t!

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.0

:rolleyes:

584889416[/snapback]

Fell for it. Damn you... :pinch:

4AM release? Goddamn. First it's HL2 with a 3AM release. Now this? Ah well. I'm going to bed at 1 and hopefully by the time I wake up, I will be able to upgrade if indeed it does come out by then. :yes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!