Recommended Posts

Let me guess, you're a horde Rogue or Druid?

Wrong and wrong.

I'm a BE paladin, and I have an alt hunter.

Why would you assume I was a rogue? Dps? have fun at end game.

Druid? Hahaha. No thanks.

If I wanted to be rediculously chliche I'd be a Shaman, easily the most powerful class.

Although lock's can do a 10,000 crit with shadowbolt.

If I wanted to be rediculously chliche I'd be a Shaman, easily the most powerful class.

Although everyone seems to have his own opinion on what class is the most powerful, I find this rather funny. :blink:

Anyway, locks getting 10k shadowbolt crits isn't what makes them overpowered. Having a spec like SL/SL is what makes them overpowered.

Wrong and wrong.

I'm a BE paladin, and I have an alt hunter.

Why would you assume I was a rogue? Dps? have fun at end game.

Druid? Hahaha. No thanks.

If I wanted to be rediculously chliche I'd be a Shaman, easily the most powerful class.

Although lock's can do a 10,000 crit with shadowbolt.

HAHA Be Pally.

You might aswell be a Draenei shammy, no doubt female being played by a male.

Locks are a very very nice class to play, much better imo than Mr.Hunter, the most rolled toon ever :p

HAHA Be Pally.

You might aswell be a Draenei shammy, no doubt female being played by a male.

Locks are a very very nice class to play, much better imo than Mr.Hunter, the most rolled toon ever :p

You're right, I might as well be a Draenei Shammy, if I was alliance. I'm sorry, but hunters not rolled more than locks, even if they were, it would make the game that much better, nice try.

All I'm saying is Alliance, like you've already proven, is a bunch of immature people.

(and the weak insult of me playing as a girl, I really do pity you.)

All I'm saying is Alliance, like you've already proven, is a bunch of immature people.

From my experience of playing WoW for many years I can safely say. You're both as bad as each other. The mature adult would back down and ignore them.

I've seen both sides in the past. Both /1 channels are full of illiterate fools grasping for attention.

I never once said I was better, infact I complimented locks because of the damage they can do.

All I said was;

1. Alliance + Lock = hilarious combination; to me only, obviously.

2. from my OWN experience, yes, disregarding all of yours because I am rude, and the immature one, alliance players in game and in real life are by far the worst people to share a gaming experience with.

Anyway, too far off topic, and getting into flaming;

/endargument.

Wrong and wrong.

I'm a BE paladin, and I have an alt hunter.

Why would you assume I was a rogue? Dps? have fun at end game.

Druid? Hahaha. No thanks.

If I wanted to be rediculously chliche I'd be a Shaman, easily the most powerful class.

Although lock's can do a 10,000 crit with shadowbolt.

Wrong and wrong.

You're not allowed to talk about end game in ssc / tk =/ sorry.

Also, if you seriously think you can possibly classify the few million people who play wow into Alliance = immature and Horde = Mature... you you must be one of the most ignorant people out there.

andd.. making fun of someone for choosing a lock? Did you miss what locks have been one of the best classes in the game for years(from both a pve dps*provided the guild is smart and knows how to use them* and pvp prospective)? FYI, hunters are one of the worst ranged dps classes in the game... hence why they weren't even invited to naxx raids (the only instance that actually took skill).

So really after reading just a few of your posts you should really stop trying to talk down to people, you honestly have no clue what you're talking about.

~Dx

Edited by being-obtatyion
I'm sorry, but hunters not rolled more than locks, even if they were, it would make the game that much better, nice try.

I'm sorry you're wrong.... http://www.warcraftrealms.com/census.php nice try. Talk out of your ass more please!

(This is my last point about this)

FYI, hunters are one of the worst ranged dps classes in the game...

Not entirely true. Problem amongts hunters is tons of them claim Marksmanship being the best DPS spec, even though there are proofs of it being the worst raiding/dps spec.

If properly specced and geared, a Beast mastery hunter is the 2nd single target dps class, right behind rogues. And that includes even Black Temple/Hyjal, excluding Archimonde which is a really pet-unfriendly fight and hunters can't do as much dps on it as usual... Before the scorpid pet bug was fixed, not even rogues were on par with BM hunter dps, cause the pet itself could dash out insane amount of dps, in range of ~700 dps (if the pet was properly talented, and it's skills were used at the right time).

alliance players in game and in real life are by far the worst people to share a gaming experience with.

How can you be so childish?

I'm really interested what alliance have done to you for you to make such an opinion? Were you ganked a lot? Got scammed? Been insulted? That happens on both sides, and claiming everyone's like that on alliance makes you no better than those players whom you disliked in the first place.

Edited by Blitz

^Made some very valid points there. Although to my experiences with my guild the real use for hunters is tsa witch is highly effective if the hunter is properly geared for it. Although I quit a few months after ago after illidan =P and we only had 2 hunters in the guild because we never recruited post tbc and they wern't needed in naxx.

2. from my OWN experience, yes, disregarding all of yours because I am rude, and the immature one, alliance players in game and in real life are by far the worst people to share a gaming experience with.

Anyway, too far off topic, and getting into flaming;

/endargument.

Since you decided to make me look like an ignorant ass, without posting the part where I said FROM MY OWN EXPERIENCE, I guess I need to reiterate that for you.

Now, I'm sure everyone that has been obviously offended by me insulting the alliance is/was/has been an alliance player, if you're not, and playing devil's advocate (ie; arguing just for the sake of it, all apologies about being immature are welcomed) don't bother responding again.

Now, to explain why I don't like Alliance even more so; read the posts above bickering, complaining and whining about what I said. Sure, I generalized, and stereo-typed all of the alliance by saying they are immature, now, that's not ME being immature, it's me being ignorant to the fact that there are some cool alliance players out there; however it's not my fault that the ones I have met IRL and played with have represented themselves and fellow alliance as nothing more than 12 year olds that just learned how to spell swear words.

I believe this spawned from me saying something to the affect of "hahaa, of all the combinations". When did I personally belittle anyone directly? If anything you all jumped on the bandwagon of defense towards me.

I'm sorry you're all so touchy, and are obviously against a rivalry that makes the game what it is, but it's really not my problem.

I apologize, and I was wrong about the actual stats and facts of races/classes. "being-obtatyion" proved me wrong, and I do apologize. I suppose I should stop making such general comments when the actual facts are different.

Let's just play.

ps. My hunter owns your Lock. lulz, relax.

edit: Analogy; why do Red Socks fans hate the yankee's and their fans? I'm sure both fan nations don't have direct problems/dislike towards every single one of each other, it's just a rivalry, and part of the game, again, making it what it is.

Edited by IanPete

I really really must be an unlucky player... Since I started doing SSC/TK with my guild I haven't seen a single hunter drop (except for the tier items, got 3 of them), it really ****es me off... No Al'ar gun, no ranger-general's chestguard, nothing... And we've been farming through that content, except for Vashj and KT... I didn't even get the Sunfury Bow even though I run Karazhan every week for the last 5 months. -.-

Blizzard should really change the way loot tables work, and make it more likely to drop an item that hasn't dropped for the players yet...

You're right, I might as well be a Draenei Shammy, if I was alliance. I'm sorry, but hunters not rolled more than locks, even if they were, it would make the game that much better, nice try.

All I'm saying is Alliance, like you've already proven, is a bunch of immature people.

(and the weak insult of me playing as a girl, I really do pity you.)

The insult if any of playing as a girl only comes if in someway your not comfortable with your self. tell you now why Hunters are rolled far more than Locks, purely as they make the best farming toons. Ever been to STV? Invariably every bot and gold farmer out there has a Hunter on a 10 day trial account called "xghyrtx".

Alliance is no way more or less mature than Horde, depends on server etc. Look at Magtheridon Eu its crawling with fanboys of Nihl.

<3 how your dominating this thread making yourself to be the bees knees in Hunters / wow players. How many others are you having "discussions" with in this thread other than me? Surely it couldnt be you who is abresive.... could it?!

Also whats with the nice try and I pity you statements, lighten up mate its only a bit of a joke. Im not gonna get pulled into any forum flame wars or other non-sensical chit chat with you. I will say one thing tho, you dont further the stereotype that Horde = Mature players... not at all.

Anyways moving on... oh no its the Gnooomes!!!

post-29122-1191852565_thumb.jpg

Edited by Colicab

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!