Recommended Posts

I wish i really had the time to give this game some more attention.... i started my 10 day trial on thursday and ive managed to jump on it twice for 45 minutes :(

it ends on sunday i think and i'm wondering if it's worth paying the subscription for the little amount of time i'm going to get to play on it.

crazy stuff people booking days off work to play it haha.

Looks like we have a date: November 13.

O ya, means its time to start prepping for the release. Start saving up Flasks of Relentless assualt, figure out how to get enchanting to 450 as quick as possible stock up on some BC mats to help me gain 10-20 points easily. Continue to pray so I can get on beta and learn a leveling path to quickly get me up there. Start picking out tank gear (some of my current gear/gear from BT will easily last me until Naxx/badges) to grab on the way to 80, and save up massive amount of gold.

BtW Adam/Eve did ya'll have OT get SR for Mother? I know myself and the other tanks will alternate as MT/OT for the fight, but I was wondering if I'll be OTing it, how much SR gear I need if any.

I wish i really had the time to give this game some more attention.... i started my 10 day trial on thursday and ive managed to jump on it twice for 45 minutes :(

it ends on sunday i think and i'm wondering if it's worth paying the subscription for the little amount of time i'm going to get to play on it.

crazy stuff people booking days off work to play it haha.

You could always use the game cards or cancel/resubscribe when you feel like playing. :)

I had the last 2 weeks of November booked off anyway: 1 week to be lazy around my house and toss up Christmas Lights etc, then I'm taking off to Mexico for a week. By the time I'm back most of my guild should be ready for Naxx?again.

BtW Adam/Eve did ya'll have OT get SR for Mother? I know myself and the other tanks will alternate as MT/OT for the fight, but I was wondering if I'll be OTing it, how much SR gear I need if any.

Our tanks don't wear any. I think when we were learning they'd toss on the neck+cape and then decided it wasn't worth it.

Got a beta invite and just downloaded all the patches last night. Moving a couple 70s to Northrend if anyone is interested in running something sometime.

70 hunter

70 priest healer

70 paladin tank

70 mage

Live realms, i've been on Lothar since release. Anyone else play there?

I had the last 2 weeks of November booked off anyway: 1 week to be lazy around my house and toss up Christmas Lights etc, then I'm taking off to Mexico for a week. By the time I'm back most of my guild should be ready for Naxx…again.

Our tanks don't wear any. I think when we were learning they'd toss on the neck+cape and then decided it wasn't worth it.

Then I might just get the cape made up. I haven't been able to get a group to kill Fathom Lord so I can't talk to that guy to finish the quest to get the neck. But I really don't think I'll any and if I or the other two tanks get Demonic Energy, we should be able to be healed through.

Demonic energy isn't really a concern: your lash tanks have forever to be healed and your main tank is being spammed so neither should really hurt you. The real concern is idiots getting ported and running through the tanks and the solution to that isn't to make your tanks wear SR.

I started a Shammy character. So far it has been nice playing it. Hit level 21 few moments ago. Though I have one question. I am a Enhancement Shaman. What kind of gear should I be wearing in the future (intellect/stamina/strength)? Here is my current one (could be few minutes/hours outdated):

WoW Armory

I can't check your armory as I'm at work, but I can offer some advice for an enhancement shaman.

I went from 1-64 as enhancement, and then switched to elemental because enhance had major threat issues and shaman (still have) no CC so I was pretty undesireable for 5 man instances. This was around 2.1 or so. Since then enhancement threat has been reduced a little and a couple talent changes have made the spec a bit more desireable for PvE grouping. I have switched back to enhancement as I like it more than elemental, but my gear isn't that great as my shaman is an alt character and WotLK will regear him anyways. Level 80 will give shamans a limited CC ability (Hex), but the cooldown is 15 seconds longer than the max ability duration... so I'm not sure how great it's really going to be. But at least it's something.

As far as gear, you'll be going for STR, ATP (1 STR = 2 ATP), and Crit. For the higher levels you'll want to add hit since dual wield has such an awful miss chance, but you won't need as much as a rogue. And STA and INT to taste, really.

You want the slowest possible 1H weapons. And you'll want to use windfury on both weapons. Ideally you'd want your swing timer above 3.0 because windfury has a hidden 3 second cooldown, but there are not any viable 1H weapons that slow. So you'll be aiming to keep your swing timer above 1.5 seconds with Flurry (and other constant haste effects) active. This equals a base weapon speed of 2.0 or 2.1, I don't remember. But the slower the better.

I found the first 30 levels on my shaman the worst. You don't have a lot of the better abilities until that point. Windfury and Astrall Recall come to mind. Since then I've been pretty happy with him. You can look him up if you want. Look for Onikk on Malygos.

He means unless your covered head-to-to in top end raid gear you'll replace everything you have before November 30th.

Yup, most T6 stuff will last until Naxx/Badge gear upgrades, anything lower should be replaced by blues/heroics. Already planning a tanking set for my warrior once I hit 80 and some pieces that I have will work, and hopefully we will be killing bosses that do drop what I could use.

And thanks Evn, I'll point that out and see what happens. If were having OT deaths due to shadow damage that is idiotic damage I'll be sure to make some otherwise I'll keep my gold.

Anyone want a Scroll of Resurrection?

If you haven't played WoW for at least 90 days and are planning to get back into it, let me know so I can cast a Scroll Of Resurrection on your account so you can get free 10 days and I get a month after you pay for at least a month worth on your account.

: D

Anyone want a Scroll of Resurrection?

If you haven't played WoW for at least 90 days and are planning to get back into it, let me know so I can cast a Scroll Of Resurrection on your account so you can get free 10 days and I get a month after you pay for at least a month worth on your account.

: D

Resident One Post Wonder

Not going to happen, not to you.

I think he means that probably everyone that's posted in this thread could have already been asked for a Scroll. ;)

I don't, lol.

" "Quote -

Resident One Post Wonder"

Not going to happen, not to you.

"

He's clearly pointing out people won't trust me or something?

Ah, I don't want to argue about it though.

So after a few nights of working on my UI it's finally in good enough shape to show off. I'm sure there are a few things here and there I'll change, but this is pretty much going to be the end result:

post-20309-1221267317_thumb.jpg

If anybody wants any specifics, let me know :)

Everything is an Ace addon except QuestHelper and SmartBuff because there are (in my opinion) no good replacements for those that are Ace addons.

Duder. Any luck of packaging up that addon? Or at least, listing the addons used? It just looks really awesome.

I don't, lol.

" "Quote -

Resident One Post Wonder"

Not going to happen, not to you.

"

He's clearly pointing out people won't trust me or something?

Ah, I don't want to argue about it though.

No, why would a Neowin member go to a first time poster who cleary only posted to try to get free 30 days? If they wanted to have there account re-opened, they'd most likely ask a member who frequently post in-here rather than a person who posted to only get a free 30 days, that's what I meant by it, and I'd had hope you would realize that.

On another note, Bloodboil sucks to tank.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!