Recommended Posts

I hate to do this, but care to list a few that were created during Wrath and have since been removed?

You're really stretching my ability to remember specifics but one of the biggest changes was how incredibly easy they made heroic dungeons in Wrath. Going from perhaps hours in a dungeon to 15 minutes and from using strategy and skill to just tanking every mob at the end was just disheartening.

You're really stretching my ability to remember specifics but one of the biggest changes was how incredibly easy they made heroic dungeons in Wrath. Going from perhaps hours in a dungeon to 15 minutes and from using strategy and skill to just tanking every mob at the end was just disheartening.

 

Happened in BC too. Hard at beginning, easy at the end. Also, spending 'hours' clearing a single 5 man is hardly a great use of time.

Heroics are intended to be pre-raid difficulty, and they were. Even the "easy" WotLK heroics were tough if you were in dungeon blues and Badge of Justice pieces. As people got to farming Raid content and geared up they continued to do heroics for their daily badges and they were suddenly too easy.

 

Then Cataclysm came out and people threw a fit because the heroics were supposedly way too hard. You just cant please anyone, ever.

Happened in BC too. Hard at beginning, easy at the end. Also, spending 'hours' clearing a single 5 man is hardly a great use of time.

At the end of BC, certain heroic that were meant to be hard, stayed hard. Shattered Halls, Shadow Labs. Perhaps when the very last patch came out when all bosses had their health cut by 30% was it easier but the trash alone was the hard part. Crowd control is a lost art because of it. We now have players who know nothing about contributing all they can to the group and simply know "pew pew" or to stand and take hits without having to care about threat. It all stems from the same ideals of instant gratification. Blizzard wanted more subscriptions and they got them.

Heroics are intended to be pre-raid difficulty, and they were. Even the "easy" WotLK heroics were tough if you were in dungeon blues and Badge of Justice pieces. As people got to farming Raid content and geared up they continued to do heroics for their daily badges and they were suddenly too easy.

 

Then Cataclysm came out and people threw a fit because the heroics were supposedly way too hard. You just cant please anyone, ever.

Wrath heroics and even Naxx was able to be done with previous expansion gear. That is where the line should be drawn for unacceptable ease.

Heroics are intended to be pre-raid difficulty, and they were. Even the "easy" WotLK heroics were tough if you were in dungeon blues and Badge of Justice pieces. As people got to farming Raid content and geared up they continued to do heroics for their daily badges and they were suddenly too easy.

 

Then Cataclysm came out and people threw a fit because the heroics were supposedly way too hard. You just cant please anyone, ever.

 

This is so true.  For Cataclysm on my Warlock I was having a hell of a time getting through the heroics when it first came out.  My damage output just wasn't there, despite having as good as I could get gear from the normal dungeons.  I loved the challenge!  I just wish I had 4 awesome friends to play through the challenges with me but everyone was burnt out on WoW by that point.  So the groups I was in was either full of dumbasses who were doing much worse than me, or ###### doing much better than me and kicking me out of the group.  Ended up taking a break for a few months, and when I came back the game was so nerfed and easy that THAT wasn't fun anymore either.

 

I loved Burning Crusade and WotLK, but I think a lot of that had to do with the number of friends I knew that were all playing during that time.

Wrath heroics and even Naxx was able to be done with previous expansion gear. That is where the line should be drawn for unacceptable ease.

 

Not with the crappy Karazhan gear that I had :p

 

Naxx was trivial but Ulduar was pretty challenging IMO.  It all came down to how good the other players around you were.  I got involved in a "hard core" rading guilds in WotLK and it just took way too much of my time, left me stressed, and left me feeling like WoW was a second job.  It was fun, but not rewarding enough for the amount of time.

 

Then switch to "club" guilds and everything is virtually impossible because even though the vast majority are good players, there are a handful of "people's friends" who want to play and are just terrible.

 

The last couple of times I jumped into WoW for a month, about all that I did was PvP because it was the funnest thing that I could advance in by myself.

Wrath heroics and even Naxx was able to be done with previous expansion gear. That is where the line should be drawn for unacceptable ease.

 

And that was to alleviate the complaints over the situation with BC where people replaced every piece of their hard earned Vanilla raid gear with Hellfire Penninsula quest rewards within the first 2 hours of being there.

And that was to alleviate the complaints over the situation with BC where people replaced every piece of their hard earned Vanilla raid gear with Hellfire Penninsula quest rewards within the first 2 hours of being there.

There will always be a balancing act but these complaints were always pretty silly. With each expansion, mobs had different scales of health and damage. After BC, Blizzard wanted to resolve some of the chance involved of getting one shot or two shot within .2 seconds. To combat this, Blizzard increased the health pools and thus, also the overall damage output of mobs. I forgot all the math behind being two and three levels behind and how hit affects your dps to the target and also the target's ability to hit you more effectively. How anyone expects to hold gear from a previous expansion is beyond me.

 

Additionally, gear that you had which was tailored for your build and class stats could change in a new expansion. It would be foolish to keep gear out of nostalgia that wasn't optimal gear for you after balance changes (see huge changes to Paladins).

Fragmentation of in game systems and an overt need to cater to everyone has in many ways ruined my own time in WOW.

MOP they really started to do a lot of weird systems and things counter-intuitive to the game.

Rep Tabards gone,

Weird use of JP and VP points, making the former useless early on.

Scenarios are the new 5 mans

Loot coins to double up loot chances.

Theres been a lot of good stuff too and thats what I guess kept me playing for the first 3 patches, but Blizzards own insistance of and attitude on many subjects this expansion has been a dictatorship of sorts, and helped along with the above to drive me out.

Fragmentation of in game systems and an overt need to cater to everyone has in many ways ruined my own time in WOW.

MOP they really started to do a lot of weird systems and things counter-intuitive to the game.

Rep Tabards gone,

Weird use of JP and VP points, making the former useless early on.

Scenarios are the new 5 mans

Loot coins to double up loot chances.

Theres been a lot of good stuff too and thats what I guess kept me playing for the first 3 patches, but Blizzards own insistance of and attitude on many subjects this expansion has been a dictatorship of sorts, and helped along with the above to drive me out.

I agree to an extent. The loot coins just seem gimmicky. Scenarios I know little about but I didn't really like the few I did. Same for the brawler's guild. I don't need a ton of different things to keep me occupied, or distracted more so, I just need quality content with lore to back it up which I did not get at all from MoP.

 

I have issue with reputation requirements in general. Early on our small group of five did all the MoP dungeon achievements. We all got the super special mount but I could not use it because I didn't have the reputation with the Cloud Serpents or whatever. It was pretty ridiculous to me at the time. There were so many dailies to do, again, it felt like a distraction. Then to not be able to use my mount which I worked hard for, was demoralizing. I am being a little dramatic but still it was pretty messed up.

 

Edited for accuracy.

I agree to an extent. Removing reputation tabards and requiring you to do certain dungeons for your reputation is what the old Blizzard would have been against.

 

Huh? That's exactly what the "Old Blizzard" did. Rep tabards weren't added until WotLK, in BC dungeon rep was faction specific. Hellfire instances = Honor Hold, Zangarmarsh = Cenarion Expedition, etc.

 

They've added faction championing back in MoP too, only without the tabard requirement.

Huh? That's exactly what the "Old Blizzard" did. Rep tabards weren't added until WotLK, in BC dungeon rep was faction specific. Hellfire instances = Honor Hold, Zangarmarsh = Cenarion Expedition, etc.

 

They've added faction championing back in MoP too, only without the tabard requirement.

Oh you're right. There's been so much back and forth over the years I confused myself. Tabards were all symbolic then rather than useful.

The championing in MoP is much more limited.  You can only champion a rep for 1 dungeon run a day.  

 

Didn't know that, had maxed out all my reps before they added it so I never used it.

 

Besides 5.4 is here now and the rep requirements for gear have been removed so its moot.

Didn't know that, had maxed out all my reps before they added it so I never used it.

 

Besides 5.4 is here now and the rep requirements for gear have been removed so its moot.

Really?? This is the problem with WoW.. it's like: "Oh you don't want to work for good gear? Okay.. then wait a couple patches and you won't have to do more than login."

There is very little sense of achievement anymore in WoW.

  • Like 2

Really?? This is the problem with WoW.. it's like: "Oh you don't want to work for good gear? Okay.. then wait a couple patches and you won't have to do more than login."

There is very little sense of achievement anymore in WoW.

Agreed, I no longer play it, but my wife does and she's thinking about quitting

Agreed, I no longer play it, but my wife does and she's thinking about quitting

My account is still active, but haven't played in over a month.  The game was good back when you had to actually do things.  I remember playing my Mage in BC and I HAD o Sheep when I was told, otherwise.. I would wipe us all.  

Now.. when you tell someone to CC.. they have no clue what you mean.. or they call you old.  There is a reason the player base is dropping, and that the game is no where near as fierce and competitive as it once was.

  • Like 1

My account is still active, but haven't played in over a month.  The game was good back when you had to actually do things.  I remember playing my Mage in BC and I HAD o Sheep when I was told, otherwise.. I would wipe us all.  

Now.. when you tell someone to CC.. they have no clue what you mean.. or they call you old.  There is a reason the player base is dropping, and that the game is no where near as fierce and competitive as it once was.

TG Fury tanking was something I missed, Embarrassed the odd Paladin in my time :p

 

Man I miss Wrath. (last time I had any real fun gearing and raiding)

Its been a year now. Theres no point in farming rep for crappy 489 ilvl gear, thus they removed the requirement to make current content more accessible.

Thing is though.. anyone who should be running current content.. should be geared already.  They had a year to farm and build up.  The AH is 100% accessible, guilds will do runs.  It is not hard or difficult to get gear.. these requirement removals is to cater to kids and players who don't know how to play the game and need hand outs.

TG Fury tanking was something I missed, Embarrassed the odd Paladin in my time :p

 

Man I miss Wrath. (last time I had any real fun gearing and raiding)

For me Wrath was like a break.  I didn't have to work hard, I could heal with my priest through anything.. it was like EZ Mode.  It was a nice change from the stress of TBC.. however once Cata came out.. it was like Blizz decided that everything was still too hard.. and tried to make too many people happy.. which doesn't work.

And the thing is.. blizz didn't like cookie cutter builds.. so they decide: "Lets just get rid of builds.. and give 4 options"  they take away too much from the players.. to make it easier for others.

I mean.. I have to suffer because some dudes 8yo kid made a ###### spec and was confused.

  • Like 1

For me Wrath was like a break.  I didn't have to work hard, I could heal with my priest through anything.. it was like EZ Mode.  It was a nice change from the stress of TBC.. however once Cata came out.. it was like Blizz decided that everything was still too hard.. and tried to make too many people happy.. which doesn't work.

And the thing is.. blizz didn't like cookie cutter builds.. so they decide: "Lets just get rid of builds.. and give 4 options"  they take away too much from the players.. to make it easier for others.

I mean.. I have to suffer because some dudes 8yo kid made a ****ty spec and was confused.

agreed, BC builds were better 17/44/00

agreed, BC builds were better 17/44/00

I remember my Mage had a 40/0/21 spec.  I would do an arcane blast 3 times, then do POM + Frosbolt and Arcane Missiles if it proc'd. 

 

It was fun having rotations and things to stick to.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!