Now that you've seen it: Are you gettin a Mac Mini


You gettin one?  

438 members have voted

  1. 1. You gettin one?

    • Yep, defo
      155
    • No
      147
    • Undecided.
      136


Recommended Posts

How much did the upgrade to 512MB ram cost you?? Apple severely overcharges for RAM, and if you can install it yourself, I'd recommend looking elsewhere for your RAM.

585279595[/snapback]

Upgrade to 512 was ?50. I know they overcharge and stuff but I wouldn't be confident in fiddling about with the insides so to be honest I don't mind paying an extra ?50 for 512.

Once I become more confident with Macs, both software and hardware sides then I think I'll definately look to buy some more RAM elsewhere and then fit it myself.

Edited by bass87

i wont be getting one. if i could use it as my MCE05 box i would. but theres no way to install windows on that. it would go great on the living room next to the tv. but i was a PC user wanting to get into the mac. i bought a mac which runs jaguar and im really not impressed. everytime i get on the machine i think... whats there to do... basicallynothing but surf the web and IM. thats one my main gripes about the mac. sorry i just wanted to post this since i see alot of people sayin its going to be their first mac.

all i can say is i was dissapointed.

p.s. the pearpc made me want to buy a mac. it runs panther and tiger but after buying the mac i wasnt impressed. back to windows i go.

damnit, i tried to make this not so threadcrappy but it turned out it is anyway. sorry folks

ps.ps. i think they should make a 20 gb version. if i was ableto use it as an MCE box i would just install the os on there and use my 250gigger server to serve me all the movies, music, and pics i wanted. ... say ... $399 mayue? :p wishfull thinking.

i bought a mac which runs jaguar and im really not impressed. everytime i get on the machine i think... whats there to do... basicallynothing but surf the web and IM. thats one my main gripes about the mac.

585279650[/snapback]

that's because you'd never used a mac before and were unfamiliar with the software available for it and the plethora of features available in the os itself. this is just a guess, but I'm assuming you didn't do the following:

- boot up the mac

- ask "what do I do on my pc"

- make a list

- find mac software that does that stuff

unless, of course everything you do on your pc is impossible to do on a mac, which i doubt.

that's because you'd never used a mac before and were unfamiliar ...

that is what i did... i made a mental list at least, and i didnt find anything that was worth buying. or dling to say at least.

also i didnt say its impossible. i just find myself not being very productive on a mac than i am on a windows. its the same with linux though. so dont take offense I was just telling my story.

btw. where did you get your sig? tis funny...

well you can always find a cheap monitor at your local goodwill or other second hand store( trust me, ive found some gems) or at a swap meet or other spots, Keyboards too. I also think this is probably a good cheap way for someone to get into learning OSX. :) if i had the extra cash id definately buy one. But only with 512mb Im just not comfortable with only 256, because i know ill be doing some kind of multitasking (after i get familiar with the OSX environment. :)

p.s disregard my first post in this thread. I was thinking about this and have come to the conclusion that this is a cool idea. :)

I have always been interested in a MAC, and i guess this is how Apple are gonna try and steal seom windows customers, which i see working well as it's extremely well designed. There is no case as well built in the pc range which is a shame.

Just one question if i was to get a bigger hdd, 160GB or something how do you go about reloading osX? Does the mac mini come with a restore / OS disc which can be bunged into to reload the OS. I did read that a backup of the OS is supplied but i didn't know if somehow they are locked to the 40GB drive.

Like i said i am interested in the MAC's and as voted i will get one. I will be using it as a dedicated photo lab (i take alot of digital photo's)

If i was crucial i would be advertising Mac Mini RAM upgrades on their front page :devil:

I wouldn't let entry level people use this computer, (i manage 16 computers, all pc's) because my users would simply go out and buy something built for a pc then complain to me that whatever they purchased won't work with the imac. This is for mac users in general and people comfortable with apple. PC users that use windows will not be amazed by it, because of thier knowlege of video cards and processors(noting that the imac isn't as fast as most emachines,gateways and hp's of current). I would purchase it for myself, but I don't need it. As soon as apple makes thier pc's compatible with ibm clones, then there would be no conflicts with hardware and software and my users could have either. I don't dislike this Imac, and would like to own it and distribute it to my users just because of the very size of the thing. That is a definite plus when shopping around for a pc.

Jeers to apple for not sqeezing in a extra slot for ram I am definitely going to get one but I have no idea what I am going to select for ram or how I will upgrade

I would like over 512 Megs but a 1 gig stick cost too much I wish I could just get the default 256 and order a 512 stick from crucial and add it in

I wouldn't let entry level people use this computer, (i manage 16 computers, all pc's) because my users would simply go out and buy something built for a pc then complain to me that whatever they purchased won't work with the imac. This is for mac users in general and people comfortable with apple

when did it say by law that it is for just "mac users" :rolleyes:

PC users that use windows will not be amazed by it, because of thier knowlege of video cards and processors(noting that the imac isn't as fast as most emachines,gateways and hp's of current).

Not all pc users think the same as far as how they would like there system to perform, and what needs they have as far as a PC again i give you a :rolleyes:

Edited by ripgut

Already sold my pc (se sig) - just have to place the order.. :fun: (Y)

I never play games anymore - just surf the net, fiddle with my pictures (got a digi-cam this x-mas) etc nothing serious - think this little rascal is going to fit me quite nicely. :D

Already sold my pc (se sig) - just have to place the order..? :fun::(Y))

I never play games anymore - just surf the net, fiddle with my pictures (got a digi-cam this x-mas) etc nothing serious - think this little rascal is going to fit me quite nicely.?:D:D

585280869[/snapback]

Yep, that's the exact same thing that I will use the Mini Mac for. Surf the net/email, use iTunes along with my iPod Mini and use my Digital Camera in conjunction with iPhoto. That's pretty much it.

I've wanted to make the switch for quite a while, but it's always been too expensive but now it is a viable option.

Yep, that's the exact same thing that I will use the Mini Mac for. Surf the net/email, use iTunes along with my iPod Mini and use my Digital Camera in conjunction with iPhoto. That's pretty much it.

I've wanted to make the switch for quite a while, but it's always been too expensive but now it is a viable option.

585280934[/snapback]

Same as you both :) I never play games on my PC now as I have an xbox and PS2, so all I do is browse the net, email, msn, my illustration work and music (iTunes and iPod) so its going to be just what I need.

So selling my PC and iBook to fund to get a Mini Mac and 20" Apple Display. (See Neobay for these 2 items).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!