Official Superbowl XXXIX Discussion

By neufuse
in The Sporting Arena

 Share

Who do you think will win the super bowl this year?  

207 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you think will win the super bowl this year?

    • New England
      133
    • Philadelphia
      74

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

kak

Posted
Posted
Dynasty Baby!

585346553[/snapback]

Please. Hardly a dynasty when you have a rookie quarterback choke in the first half that otherwise would have tore you up like he did in the first meet.

I'll be rooting for the Eagles, although I think the Pats will win.

Grand Master

imtoomuch

Posted
Posted

New England. If I had to bet I'd put my money on the Pats because they've been there and won it before. The Eagles are also an unpredictable, and sometimes, unreliable team. Make no mistake, though, I want Philadelphia to win. Coming into the playoffs I said I'd be happy as long as the Steelers didn't win the Super Bowl and with that now guaranteed I'm pretty satisfied.

Grand Master

BroChaos Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
word up yo

Tom Brady a good ol Michigan fella is gonna rip the Eagles a new @$$

585346550[/snapback]

go blue!!

too bad ty law hasn't been playing...they could use him on D.

i don't think any arses will be torn, it will be a close game. but brady is just THE MAN when it comes to winning big games. it'd be silly to go against him.

Veteran

QuantumTrickery

Posted
Posted

Patriots will win, no question about it. I doubt it'll even be a close game. I'd be expecting the Patriots to win by 2 touchdowns. The only hope the Eagles have is that the team all gets food poisoning or something so they can't play. Steelers could have taken the Eagles with little problems, let alone New England.

Grand Master

neufuse Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
Patriots will win, no question about it.  I doubt it'll even be a close game.  I'd be expecting the Patriots to win by 2 touchdowns.  The only hope the Eagles have is that the team all gets food poisoning or something so they can't play. Steelers could have taken the Eagles with little problems, let alone New England.

585347504[/snapback]

yeah, the steelers could of taken them both, but they overplayed rothlisberger and wore the poor guy out over the past 17 games that he played... I don't think he was use to the attention and playing such high profile games at the level he did and it just took its toll on him over time... after his 11th win his stats slowly started to go down like he was starting to get tired.

Grand Master

....

Posted
Posted
Please. Hardly a dynasty when you have a rookie quarterback choke in the first half that otherwise would have tore you up like he did in the first meet.

585346576[/snapback]

:laugh: Oh man, thanks for the morning laugh. erm....46-26. I'd say NE tore apart Pittsburgh....lol! Roethlisberger didn't tear anyone up all year. Pittsburgh got exposed for what they were. A mediocre team that had a medocre QB that didn't make mistakes, with a darn good Defense.

Remember Baltimore anyone?

Anywhoo....Pats will win.

Grand Master

Laughing-Man

Posted
Posted

Obviously the Steelers couldn't have taken both the Eagles and Patriots or they would have beat the Patriots. The Patriots are a much more balanced team then the Steelers, the Patriots have both a passing and running game and an undefeated QB in the playoffs. The Steelers had a rookie quaterback who was put in the right place at the right time. If it wasn't for the rushing game and the Steelers would had relied on Big Ben then they would have lost more games. He barely squeaked by the Jets, but the Patriots showed that he was a rookie. The Eagles never showed up for the matchup during the season and it was an eye opener. Changes were made to the defense and I think the Eagles would have prevailed a second time around.

Since I have been an Eagles' fan since I was born and will be for life, this is the year they win. If the Red Socks won against all odds then the Eagles sure as hell can win.

Grand Master

Dave Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

It's our year, the Eagles will win this game.

It'll be a grid it out defensive game, that is to the Eagles advantage. If Owens plays and the D shows up like they did yesterday it will be Destiny over Dynasty and it won't be close.

Grand Master

Aaron Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Philly's O-line completely dominated the Falcons. I think that was the #1 reason for their win. McNabb had all fricking day to throw the ball. That and for some reason the Falcons completely abandoned what got us their in the first place - the running game. Only 26 carries the entire game is pretty ****ty from the #1 rushing team in the league. I will have to pull for the Eagles now. Got to have some for of redemption by knowing that the team that bumped us out ended up winning the Super bowl.

Grand Master

CatnipOligarchy

Posted
Posted
Philly's O-line completely dominated the Falcons.  I think that was the #1 reason for their win.  McNabb had all fricking day to throw the ball.  That and for some reason the Falcons completely abandoned what got us their in the first place - the running game.  Only 26 carries the entire game is pretty ****ty from the #1 rushing team in the league.  I will have to pull for the Eagles now.  Got to have some for of redemption by knowing that the team that bumped us out ended up winning the Super bowl.

585348801[/snapback]

well said. vick kept trying to make something happen with his arms, with little screen plays, and it just wasnt happening. we never established the run, and philly never looked back. quarterbacks can only dream of having the kind of time mcnabb had in the pocket yesterday, absolutely pathetic. overall we had a great season though, no one even expected us to get that far. the great thing about sports, theres always next year (unless youre talking about hockey.)

After sleeping on it, i've also decided i'm going to pull for the eagles. as much as i dont like their fans, andy reid is a deserving coach, mcnabb a deserving quarterback, i'd be able to say we lost to the champs, and tom brady deserves to suffer after that god awful Sirius commercial with John Madden.

Grand Master

BroChaos Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

that win for the pats not only put belichick at 9-1 in the playoffs, brady at 8-0 in the playoffs, but here's my favorite:

when belichick faces the same qb twice in one year he is 8-6 in the first game, and 14-0 in the second game. that right there shows how great of a coach he is.

the mnf game was an anomoly. they only lost cuz brady made mistakes. the eagles won't be counting on that to happen in the SB.

brady has the best interception ratio in the history of the playoffs.

Grand Master

Dave Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
After sleeping on it, i've also decided i'm going to pull for the eagles. as much as i dont like their fans,

585348876[/snapback]

And don't think we don't relish the fact that everyone hates us.

Eagles fans are the best fans in the NFL, period.

Veteran

BMac

Posted
Posted

It pains me to say it but the Pats are going to take it. NE has a complete team. With this years acquisition of Dillon the Pats now have quite a potent offense to fit their very strong D. The only good thing I can see coming from this game is that Brady shouldn't be the MVP. If it were up to me it'd go to Bruschi as he's been amazing in the playoffs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • AMD 9070XT

      By Circaflex · Posted

      One reason it might be running hotter is dust build up within the cooling or perhaps the paste has dried out. You could always try repasting your old GPU and cleaning the cooler. Your experience in Linux will be much better with an AMD GPU; the performance in gaming is much closer to Windows than nVidia would be. I personally think on Windows, AMD drivers are junk.
    • AMD 9070XT

      By Steven P. · Posted

      I reviewed it back in March, but I didn't have a 5070 at the time https://www.neowin.net/reviews/amd-rx-9070-review-vs-rtx-5070-4070-and-rx-9070-xt-7800-xt--just-good-enough/ When I reviewed the 9070 I did have a 5070 to compare it against, so the scores are there for the 9070 XT. it outperforms the 5070 in raster, and is barely neck and neck in Ray Tracing. So it's better than a 5070 in everything but Ray Tracing where it is neck and neck, or just under. To be honest, the uplift from 3080 when it was new to the 9070 XT is not as great a step up. If you can find a used 4080 Super for around the same money, you would probably be better off, but if you only want to buy new then the 16GB 9070 XT is the best value for money in its category.
    • WildBit Viewer 6.20 released; no further updates planned

      By +Eternal Tempest · Posted

      I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD 9070XT

      By Arceles · Posted

      AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Nearly 70% of Steam users now run Windows 11

      By WaltC · Posted

      Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!