Official Superbowl XXXIX Discussion


Who do you think will win the super bowl this year?  

207 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you think will win the super bowl this year?

    • New England
      133
    • Philadelphia
      74


Recommended Posts

just a quick question what is superbowl? is it baskteball, basball or hockey or what? (never did understand US sports) and is it some sort of final?

anyway i hope new england win.. cuz they named after the country i live in :D

585361718[/snapback]

Campionship game for the NFL. its football (not soccer)

CLICK

thats what the pats had to endure when they won their first superbowl....if you remember, ever expert said pats had no chance of winning their SB in 2001 or whatever it was.

585361697[/snapback]

Eh your right. History shows that favored teams don't always win in the Super Bowl. Like you said, no one would have thought the Patriots could beat the Rams in 2001.

That is the other thing that sort of peeves me. I don't understand why they are being called a dynasty. They barely won their Super Bowls, they have beat their opponents by like 3 points. If it wasn't for the stupid tuck rule they would not have been in the super bowl in 2001. People also seem to forget or disregard that the Patriots were 9-7 in 2002 and never made the playoffs. I don't think they were really dominant like dynasties like the Cowboys or Steelers of the past.

Has anyone watched ESPN lately?  Can they hype up the Patriots are going to win the Super Bowl any more then they are aleady doing?  Man I got sick of it after watching for 5 minutes last night.  They made it seem like the Eagles were content with winning the NFC and are lucky to be in the Super Bowl.  It may be just me, but since the beginning of the playoffs I have really started to hate them.

585361074[/snapback]

The Pats have been overlooked all season by these guys and they pretty much counted them out of the last two games, too. It's basically just them eating their words. They gave the Pats no respect until now.

Eh your right.  History shows that favored teams don't always win in the Super Bowl.  Like you said, no one would have thought the Patriots could beat the Rams in 2001.

That is the other thing that sort of peeves me.  I don't understand why they are being called a dynasty.  They barely won their Super Bowls, they have beat their opponents by like 3 points. If it wasn't for the stupid tuck rule they would not have been in the super bowl in 2001.  People also seem to forget or disregard that the Patriots were 9-7 in 2002 and never made the playoffs.  I don't think they were really dominant like dynasties like the Cowboys or Steelers of the past.

585361823[/snapback]

blowouts or not though...a superbowl win is a win. it doesn't really matter how you got it. you can't take that away from them just because they were close games. 2 out of 3 years is pretty impressive these days, and if they get 3 out of 4, thats a dynasty IMO.

blowouts or not though...a superbowl win is a win.  it doesn't really matter how you got it.  you can't take that away from them just because they were close games.  2 out of 3 years is pretty impressive these days, and if they get 3 out of 4, thats a dynasty IMO.

585362239[/snapback]

I some what disagree with you. There has been many times during games where the refs has decided the out come. Majority of the time, they let the players play and put away their flags. As long as one team doesn't win because of a ref, then its a win, but if a ref decides the out come, then it sucks for the other team. I do agree with the dynasty part tho.

That is the other thing that sort of peeves me.  I don't understand why they are being called a dynasty.  They barely won their Super Bowls, they have beat their opponents by like 3 points. If it wasn't for the stupid tuck rule they would not have been in the super bowl in 2001.  People also seem to forget or disregard that the Patriots were 9-7 in 2002 and never made the playoffs.  I don't think they were really dominant like dynasties like the Cowboys or Steelers of the past.

Oh man I take offense to that ( as a loyal patriots and sports fan). I don't not think they can technically be called a dynasty now, but if they pull off this win they will be. In this football age with the cap and free agency being consistent is incredibly difficult. This season, and last season, the Pats played with more different starters than any other NFL team and still managed to dominate. That speaks volumes not only of the coaching staff but also of the overall pysche of the team - they do what they can to help them win and take no glory for themselves.

The tuck rule, also, is a rule, so there's no arguing there (and the Patriots still had to drive down the field, and they still had to make the field goal kick in the snow, so it's not like the game ended right there).

And not really dominant? They've two games the entire season, and lost two games last season. Belicheck (as of right now) has the same playoff record as Vince Lombardi (arguably the greatest coach of all time). And if they don't dominate a game score wise, they still win - and in the end, that's all that matters.

Also - ref's don't decide the outcome of the game - they're simply regulated the actions of the players, so its not like the games completely change based on the refs.

Since TO is back in the Super Bowl, and is, according to some sources, just as fast as he was pre-injury, it could change some things.

And no, TO is not risking his career by playing -- bones can be broken, and they heal... even bones that are broken twice (Haha, I stole the quote if you read the article I'm thinking of... plagarism. :))

I think it is sort of stupid though how much the "experts" build up the Patriots. They seem to like to bring up the fact over and over again that the Patriots beat #1 passing team (Ind) and the #2 rushing team (Pit) in consecutive weeks. Didn't the Eagles just beat the #2 passing team (Min) and the #1 rushing team (Atl) or am I imagining things? They seem to forget that stat.

The wait for this game this week is going to be so painful.

Edited by jmole
I think it is sort of stupid though how much the "experts" build up the Patriots.  They seem to like to bring up the fact over and over again that the Patriots beat #1 passing team (Ind) and the #2 rushing team (Pit) in consecutive weeks.  Didn't the Eagles just beat the #2 passing team (Min) and the #1 rushing team (Atl) or am I imagining things?  They seem to forget that stat.

The wait for this game this week is going to be so painful.

585390003[/snapback]

True, but the Colts and Steelers are more of a competition than the Vikings and Falcons.

True, but the Colts and Steelers are more of a competition than the Vikings and Falcons.

585390275[/snapback]

colts and steelers are more competition? they sure didnt show it during the playoffs. stats are stats, dont favor them when they agree with what you think then then dismiss them when it doesnt.

colts and steelers are more competition? they sure didnt show it during the playoffs.  stats are stats, dont favor them when they agree with what you think then then dismiss them when it doesnt.

585390644[/snapback]

Colts were 12-4, Pittsburgh was 15-1 against a much more difficult conference. Granted, I think Pittsburgh skated through their season luckily, but they even beat the Eagles.<g>

Minnesota was 8-8, Atlanta was 11-5 against a much weaker conference.

Colts were 12-4, Pittsburgh was 15-1 against a much more difficult conference.  Granted, I think Pittsburgh skated through their season luckily, but they even beat the Eagles.<g>

585390661[/snapback]

Tougher conference eh? The Patriots couldn't beat the worst team in the easier conference. I would rather get schooled by the Steelers then suffer a humiliating defeat on Monday night football to the Dolphins. :D I know the NFC was bad this year, but I think the Patriots had an easier road to the Superbowl during the Playoffs then the Eagles did. IMO the combination of Manning/Big Ben is easier to play against then Culpepper/Vick.
Colts were 12-4, Pittsburgh was 15-1 against a much more difficult conference.  Granted, I think Pittsburgh skated through their season luckily, but they even beat the Eagles.<g>

Minnesota was 8-8, Atlanta was 11-5 against a much weaker conference.

585390661[/snapback]

I agree that the conference is more difficult but i still think that the stats still have some weight in regards to what a team does effectively. vikings were a passing team falcons were a running team and they both got stopped. regardless of the quality of opponent they did what they did well.

yeah, i wouldn't take that dolphins game seriously...the pats shoulda won, but brady made some very unusual mistakes. but yeah, it goes both ways, so a loss is still a loss. but again, brady doens't do that in the playoffs :)

There are a couple reasons I feel the Eagles will win the superbowl.

Number 1: As a lot of people already stated, Donovan McNabb is not afraid to run with the ball. If he has to he will. The Pat?s, I don?t think, have seen a scrambling QB all season. Plus the Eagles O-line is very strong and aggressive. Half the time, DMC has so much time he could mail the ball to his receiversNumber 2: Anyway you look at it, special teams is the key to good field positioning. The Eagles have this advantage, here?s why. In NE?s 2004 regular season they were ranked 29th in punting avg. and 28th in the oppositions punt reand and kick return average. Whereas Philly ranked 4th in kickoff returns. David Ackers is one the best if not the best kicker in the league. A long deep kick and NE will struggle to return it for any decent yardage. If your line of scrimmage starts at the 15 or so during most of the game, it is going to affect your play calling. I think a lot of people either don?t realize this statistic or feel it doesn?t impact the game THAT much. That?s the secret to this game: SPECIAL TEAMS. Granted, NE does have the ability to move the ball down the field. But the Eagles D has been very strong these past couple games, especially Jeremiah Trotter and Brian Dawkins who have been like pitbulls out on the field.

As for those people who saying, ?ohh it?s gonna be a blow out?, pay closer attention. Anything can happen in this league. People keep saying ?ohh well, the Steelers handed the Eagles their @$$ and we handed the Steelers theirs?, which is true, but NE lost to the Dolphins. That goes to show any team at any time can have a bad game. These are the 2 best teams in NFL They both deserve to be here. It WILL be close game, but I think the EAGLES WILL COME OUT ON TOP.

Being from Philadelphia, we love the fact that we?re the underdog and people keep telling we?re going to lose. It?s what feeds us and this city is hungrier than ever for a championship.

Dynasties don?t last forever and just like ones before NE, and this ?DYNASTYVINCE IS COMING TO PHILLY!!! COMING TO PHILLY!!!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!