Rudy Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 what is the latest build of tiger thats out there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PureLogic Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 what is the latest build of tiger thats out there? 585441764[/snapback] I think it's 8A369. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 I think it's 8A369. 585441789[/snapback] thanx :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickedkitten Veteran Posted February 9, 2005 Veteran Share Posted February 9, 2005 So then, who thinks we will see 10.3.9 before tiger gets in :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeR Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 So then, who thinks we will see 10.3.9 before tiger gets in :D 585442225[/snapback] I doubt we will get to 10.3.9 before tiger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougal.s Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 The last 3 Panther updates have been released in less than three months, which means if they stick to that schedule, we might well see 10.3.9 before Panther, which is scheduled sometime in H1 2005. Dougal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huy Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 You mean Tiger ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepneon Posted February 11, 2005 Author Share Posted February 11, 2005 Ahh! I can't wait for this OS. Apple is teasing me, releasing 10.3.8 and all... so CLOSE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PureLogic Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Ahh! I can't wait for this OS. Apple is teasing me, releasing 10.3.8 and all... so CLOSE! 585450552[/snapback] Yeah once they're past 10.3.9 Apple can't release any other updates than 10.4 anymore. Maybe they'll reserve the x.x.9 spot if something really serious comes up. Unless they go the 10.3.9.1 way :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southern Patriot Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Yeah once they're past 10.3.9 Apple can't release any other updates than 10.4 anymore. Maybe they'll reserve the x.x.9 spot if something really serious comes up. Unless they go the 10.3.9.1 way :laugh: 585451229[/snapback] Wrong. The third digit in their version numbers can go above 9 (although it never has before). Therefore, we could see 10.3.10 or 10.3.11, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PureLogic Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Wrong. The third digit in their version numbers can go above 9 (although it never has before). Therefore, we could see 10.3.10 or 10.3.11, etc. 585451293[/snapback] lol really? That looks like crap :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliott Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Yea, version numbers don't follow the standard decimal system, so you can go past 9 and on to 10 or 11 and whatnot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PureLogic Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Yea, version numbers don't follow the standard decimal system, so you can go past 9 and on to 10 or 11 and whatnot. 585451626[/snapback] In that case Apple should go for Mac OS X 10.10.10 :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macman87 Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 In that case Apple should go for Mac OS X 10.10.10 :p 585451654[/snapback] Mac OS X certainly has the "X" factor. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 The version numbers soon to be mistaken as IP addresses LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PureLogic Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Mac OS X certainly has the "X" factor.?:pp 585451760[/snapback] lol yeah, I think a lot of people will feel a certain need to purchase Mac OS X X X.:pp Apple does have a problem nothing will sound as catchy as Mac OS "X", Mac OS XI doesn't really have the same effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 they mite just go the Windows XP route and drop numbers altogether with Mac OS <InsertAnimalNameHere> Mac Os Eagle Mac Os Hawk so on... (if they go with birds that is?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PureLogic Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 they mite just go the Windows XP route and drop numbers altogether withMac OS <InsertAnimalNameHere> Mac Os Eagle Mac Os Hawk so on... (if they go with birds that is?) 585452725[/snapback] I will shoot those birds out of the sky if they do that. :p A single number sounds better than those corny names Microsoft uses like eXPerience, Millenium etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliott Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 they mite just go the Windows XP route and drop numbers altogether withMac OS <InsertAnimalNameHere> Mac Os Eagle Mac Os Hawk so on... (if they go with birds that is?) 585452725[/snapback] No, they're going to go with dogs. Mac OS Beagle, Mac OS Chihuahua, and so-forth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radioboy Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 it isn't "mac oh ess ex" it's "mac oh ess ten" everyone says ex, but it's wrong. it's ten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huy Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 I say "X" as well, but I guess we all know it's 10 in Roman numerals. "X" sounds better? :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PureLogic Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 it isn't "mac oh ess ex"it's "mac oh ess ten" everyone says ex, but it's wrong. it's ten. 585456583[/snapback] Even at Keynotes it's called Mac OS X instead of Mac OS 10. They should stick with Roman numbers, looks cool :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macman87 Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Even at Keynotes it's called Mac OS X instead of Mac OS 10. They should stick with Roman numbers, looks cool :) 585457544[/snapback] The only roman number that has the 'X' factor is.. well, 'X'. :p Have heard some people called it "OS ess" and they are die hard Apple fans too. I guess everyone understands it anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photo Monkey Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 One thing I love about OS X (I say 10, personally) is the names. Panther, Tiger, Jaguar - all sounds so cool! Not sure about the dog idea ;) Birds of pray would be cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koyder Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 (edited) One thing I love about OS X (I say 10, personally) is the names. Panther, Tiger, Jaguar - all sounds so cool! I think I know what you mean... Edited February 12, 2005 by Koyder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts