?  

1072 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes, I only use other browsers for the tabs
      159
    • Yes, I just want the enhanced security
      86
    • I already use IE
      266
    • No, I need my mouse gestures and other features
      276
    • No, M$ is 73h $uck
      207
    • No, i use linux/OSX and MS doesnt like me
      59
    • No, i use win 9x/2k and MS doesnt care about me
      19


Recommended Posts

poll is missing an unsure option.

it has not come out yet and you want a yes/no answer. wheres maybe?

i dont use mouse gestures but i do use many firefox extensions. but if i like new ie i might just go back even with out the functionality the extensions provide. have to wait and see.

anyhow i use ie nowaday every so often, so maybe i'll just continue this way.

poll is missing an unsure option.

it has not come out yet and you want a yes/no answer. wheres maybe?

i dont use mouse gestures but i do use many firefox extensions. but if i like new ie i might just go back even with out the functionality the extensions provide. have to wait and see.

anyhow i use ie nowaday every so often, so maybe i'll just continue this way.

585695239[/snapback]

I agree and will wait and see what they come out with. :shifty:

I would switch back, the only reason I don't use it is because my roommate isn't very into the tech world and would get gods amount of spyware on the computer. But if you know how to use IE, you wouldn't get a single drop of spyware. Tabs would be really nice though, I don't know if I could ever live without them again. Everything on my computer is tabbed now.

But about the standards crap, how much of the internet uses IE again? Shouldn't the standard be whatever IE renders then? It really doesn't make sense for an organization to come out and say "these are the standards because we said so." Flame me all you want, it's just common sense that however IE renders would be the standards because it has such a big monopoly on the browser world. That's why Microsoft hasn't switched to the "standards" because the fan boys for it are such a small population, they could really give a crap about them. But really, who would?

I would switch back, the only reason I don't use it is because my roommate isn't very into the tech world and would get gods amount of spyware on the computer. But if you know how to use IE, you wouldn't get a single drop of spyware. Tabs would be really nice though, I don't know if I could ever live without them again. Everything on my computer is tabbed now.

But about the standards crap, how much of the internet uses IE again? Shouldn't the standard be whatever IE renders then? It really doesn't make sense for an organization to come out and say "these are the standards because we said so." Flame me all you want, it's just common sense that however IE renders would be the standards because it has such a big monopoly on the browser world. That's why Microsoft hasn't switched to the "standards" because the fan boys for it are such a small population, they could really give a crap about them. But really, who would?

585695330[/snapback]

no, the standards should be GOOD standards. not rendering PNG's properly is not something to have as part of a standard.

and MS is part of the W3c. they didnt just come out of nowhere. everyone but MS agrees that the rules should be followed.

just because GM sells hte most cars, it doesnt mean that GM gets to set the speed limit.

If it had tabs, and a good pop-up blocker, then yup! I'd switch back. That's really the only reason I ever left IE. I LOVE tabbed browsing. (I also like the pop-up blocker than Firefox / Maxthon / Avant has).

I hope IE7 rocks... I'd switch back to it in a second. :wub:

We will all be using it. How the hell else are we supposed to access WinUpdate and other MS services, as well as tons of other sites that are 'best viewed only in IE @800x600' resolution :wacko:

585695352[/snapback]

you can get windows update with the auto update thing. you dont need to use the web interface.

i dont know if MS has any otehr services worth using a browser for :unsure:

and any site that works only in IE isnt worth going to.

you can get windows update with the auto update thing. you dont need to use the web interface.

i dont know if MS has any otehr services worth using a browser for  :unsure:

and any site that works only in IE isnt worth going to.

585695365[/snapback]

Yes, I can use the 'auto update thing', as you call it. But if I want custom updates without some journal viewers I have to go to WinUpdate. Second, Microsoft partner program just doesn't want to work with Firefox, as well as thousands of other corporate-specific sites worldwide. So your third statement is faled too unless all you use your web browser for is to look at pr0n.

Yes, I can use the 'auto update thing', as you call it. But if I want custom updates without some journal viewers I have to go to WinUpdate. Second, Microsoft partner program just doesn't want to work with Firefox, as well as thousands of other corporate-specific sites worldwide. So your third statement is faled too unless all you use your web browser for is to look at pr0n.

585695399[/snapback]

and neowin...

anyway, if you havent figured it out already, the question is supposed to be "what will be your main browser?"

i just thought that people would use a little common sense. of course all windows users are going to use IE, and thats precisely why they shouldnt be using it in the first place. MS shouldnt be forcing its product on people.

and BTW, you can choose updates in the auto update thing.

IF IE7 disabled activeX and became more secure and added tabbed browsing,....

585536004[/snapback]

My IE's activeX have been disabled for so long and is relatively secure (configured). Aside from tabs, you used the wrong ifs.

Nevertheless my vote is Yes, IE7 will be my browser second to Opera8.

... IE is way more reponsive than Firefox (try using the browser on a slow XP system and you'll see).

For now, I'm with the first option.

585695205[/snapback]

That's the problem I have. FF is just slower than IE on my machine, especially when viewing forums like Neowin.

I may go back to IE if they add tabbed browsing, made it more secure and rendered pages properly.

ummmm.....the spyware, adware and all the other bullshiit scripts that Microsoft fails to make its products immune to regardless of the almost monthly windows updates which are mostly security fixes for IE. That is just sad and the fact that it pleagues your computer like that makes me want to get rid of IE even more. Recompiling the windows code after my buddy and I get rid of IE and modify it is my next goal. Heck I may even give it away so others shall enjoy a IE free windows, thats if windows will work without IE. I've said it b4 and I'll say it again, GET FIREFOX!

585661572[/snapback]

Idiot.

Idiot.

585705803[/snapback]

Agreed. Even though I use Firefox on a regular basis, IE still has its uses.

Recompiling the code? Oh come on. It would make more sense to use tools like XPlite to remove IE (not that I'd recommend it though).

Do these people have to spam the word (as opposed to 'spreading' the word)? :no:

IF IE7 disabled activeX and became more secure and added tabbed browsing, would you switch back from firefox/opera?

Well, I answered the best fit for me: that I need other features. However, my real answer is that I don't accept the basis of this question. This "IF IE7.... became more secure" thing is simply not going to happen as far as I am concerned. The reasons are several fold. One is its tie to the OS makes any bug in it more serious than a similar bug in any other browser - the tie to Windows is itself a security risk that IE will never get rid of. And secondly, just how many times has Microsoft released a patch and said, "There, now it's more secure!" only to find out in about a week that in patching one security hole, IE introduced, in that very patch, two or three more security holes? Not that a secure IE is not possible, but it is not feasible at the moment.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!