• 0

The Definitive "BEST ANTIVIRUS" thread


Best Antivirus  

1414 members have voted

  1. 1. Best Antivirus

    • Norton/Symantec
      665
    • McAfee
      115
    • AVG
      201
    • NOD32
      131
    • PC-Cilin
      52
    • Panda
      33
    • Kaspersky
      103
    • Other
      107
    • F-Prot
      7


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Currently use NAV 2002 on two home computers. Looking to move to another product because of the system resources Norton hogs. I'm thinking NOD32 or Avast. I like the results of NOD32 at virusbulletin.com, but the free price tag on Avast peaks my interest. Any thoughts/comments from users of these two products? Thanks in advance for any responses.

  • 0
Can anyone tell me what is Symantec Antivirus Corporate edition?

What is its advantage and disadvantage compared to the home user's Norton Antivirus?

(Liveupdate subscriptions, user key, nore easy to disable by virus?....etc)

Symantec Antivirus is basically a stripped down from all bloated just version of norton antivirus. it has live update, live protect, email scanning and all that jazz, just in a simple interface without useless crap you see in norton.

the unmonitored client can work as independent desktop antivirus, while managed can connect to server version for central management.

i highly recommend the symantec corp client version over norton (been using norton since back in the day, tried corp recently)

also kaspersky is what i used previously and it was really good too, but i like the minimalism of symantec corporate client much better and it uses less memory.

here's screeny

Edited by sputnik
  • 0

You have to take those tests with a grain of salt because they mainly use zoo samples(which most independant AV tests use).

So you know zoo samples are samples that are not out spreading now which means you will probably never ever get one of them. ITW(In The Wild) samples on the otherhand are real virii that have been set loose on the public and therefore you may infact come into contact with one of them in your computing habits.

There's alot of arguing going on about whether these tests that use a persons compiled zoo collection is worth anything as an actual test.

The majority are samples that will never ever be encountered by a user so should an anti virus detect it when it's not even out there? Keep in mind the second some joker releases it and it starts infecting people it will be classified as ITW and then all the AV's will detect it.

Then you have DOS virii that can't even infect you at all. It makes sense somewhat to still scan for these as there's quite alot of 9x/Me users but for those of us on 2k/XP these things are worthless.

When it comes to trojans there's alot of BSing going around about trojans. I was on one forum and this guy had a zip with 7 "trojans" in it that NOD32 woudln't find so he freaked out, started converting everyone to Panda(which is a good AV by the way). Turns out they werent trojans but things that a trojan might use if it was included with a trojan. For instance there was one program that would hide a window so that the trojan would be completely hidden. By itself it is completely useless, it can't even hide a window because nothing has told it what to hide. Well Nod32 didn't find it. Another was a ftp program that is used by one of the common ftp server programs out there. Again completely benign unless a trojan was also directing it. Bottom line was out of the whole zip of 7 "trojans" there was maybe one real trojan in there. Now wether you want your AV to also detect the possible trojan tools is another toss up IMO. McAfee, the AV I use, did infact find all 7 "trojans" but at least it told me that they were "potentially unwanted programs" which means from that point it's up to me to make the final decision. For instance if I used servU FTP and it told me the servU FTP server was a potentially unwanted program I would leave it there. Some people seem to think everything related in any way is also a trojan must be a trojan and that's not true. One file didn't even work and couldn't infect you at all. But anyways that what alot of samples are in independant tests. Junk like this that isn't a real trojan but might be used as a trojan. Is it actually bad if an AV doesn't detect legitimate apps that could be used by trojans? In my opinion that's kinda like if my anti virus popped up with a warning saying: "Warning you are using Microsoft Windows XP. XP has commonly been used as a zombie machine, spam relay, and is easily infected by virii please remove now to uninstall windows" Is that what you want?

There's trickery like that in virii samples. Sometimes virii are messed up so they don't work. Should they be detected even though they're useless and can't infect? What about damaged files that are harmless but are the only sample a tester has? Should an AV detect a benign file damaged by a virus as an Actual Virus? I don't think so. Granted it's nice if your AV can detect it and possibly repair it but is that bad if it misses it?

Don't even get me started on spyware tests in a Anti Virus. That's a secondary feature at best and shouldn't even be included in a purchase decision especially when there's two very good if not completely better free solutions out there like Ad Aware and Spybot.

Learn the different kinds of virii, learn the distinction between zoo and itw, learn the difference between a trojan and "hacker tool"(as Kaspersky calls them) and then look at the independant tests again and you'll see what I mean. They're BS.

  • 0

I'm back to Avast! again, I just got tired of the manual updating of Antivir... I have used McAffee, Norton, Panda (all resource hogs), FreeAVG previously and Nod32. Nod32 is good, but it slowed down my computer more than Avast! even if it uses less resources???? I'm a little confused about that!

I'm still not sure if Avast! is the way to go so (I disabled a lot of stuff to speed things up) but considering I'm running an old Athlon 700 MHz with XP Pro it works pretty well!

  • 0

this is so stupid, Norton all the way! It provides regular updates however one thing i would like to see in the next version i.e. 2005 is that the automatic removal of added registry keys and values created by viruses and adware. It should also operate as a stronger adware remover in the future much more like adaware pro. However, if norton does incorporate advance adware removal Lavasoft will prob die

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!