Opera named PC World best browser or not?


Recommended Posts

Yes, one of the categories was WEB, and as a "WEB BROWSER" Opera was the only one.

What I have demonstrated now is that there is clearly room for (mis)interpretation.

Asa knew this when he blogged about it. Why did he automatically assume that Opera was lying, when clearly there was room for making mistakes? Because it was a cheap shot, and he couldn't resist the temptation.

In other words: He accused Opera of lying knowing full well that it was probably just a misunderstanding. Unlike Opera, Asa's blog post was not a misunderstanding, because his posting history about Opera clearly shows that he takes any opportunity to put it down.

So if Asa claimed that Opera lied, but he did the same thing himself, what does that make Asa?

I think the word you are looking for here is hypocrite.

Until you can carry your argument beyond mere speculation, there is no basis for calling anyone a hypocrite.

The fact remains that the Opera website made a false/misleading claim, which has recently been removed. Your little personal "crusade" against Asa simply exposes your inability to cope with the mere thought that Opera is anything less than immaculate. :rolleyes:

xpgeek

how does this affect your live? ?_?

big deal... its like saying

Parents clealy lied to you about where babies come from when you were young. If its a mistake on their part its a pretty big, and stupid, one. If its deliberate, then shame on them. I'm their son but still respected them as my parents.

zz.ZZ

xpgeek

how does this affect your live? ?_?

big deal... its like saying

Parents clealy lied to you about where babies come from when you were young. If its a mistake on their part its a pretty big, and stupid, one. If its deliberate, then shame on them. I'm their son but still respected them as my parents.

zz.ZZ

586034109[/snapback]

It's false advertising, although it might not make your puppy eat your kitten still it's very serious in terms on business ethics, imagine you are choosing between a SonyEricsson phone and a Motorola, you like both very much and can't make the choice, in the end you end up buying the SonyEricsson simply because they say it got 5 oacar nominations, but in reality it did not.

Well, I've been trying to persuade people to stop arguing, but it certainly didn't work. :p Look at what section the topic's in - Back Page "NEWS". News is consisted of FACTS, and not to be argued. If a news article is being argued whether it's true or not, it's not a fact anymore. I think the topic has been lame all the way from the start, so I suggest the admins / mods to:

1) Lock the topic and stop this pointless argument.

And / or

2) Move this to "Web Browser Discussion".

I'm not attacking anyone personally, so am I trying to get myself flamed. I'm just trying to find a solution to end this argument.

Cheers everyone!

Hehe, Rogue` the Firefox fan... Opera is actually the fastest browser ;)

It's false advertising, although it might not make your puppy eat your kitten still it's very serious in terms on business ethics

What does making a mistake have to do with business ethics? You are listening to Asa, who is known to twist the truth to suit his agenda. He lies about Opera lying.

It was a simple mistake, as explained a thousand times by now.

Hehe, Rogue` the Firefox fan... Opera is actually the fastest browser ;)

What does making a mistake have to do with business ethics? You are listening to Asa, who is known to twist the truth to suit his agenda. He lies about Opera lying.

It was a simple mistake, as explained a thousand times by now.

586034398[/snapback]

Hehe, I wasnt being funny :p I go by my own experience, and i find on my PC Firefox runs better...and whats best is its free :) (although i found a keygen for opera, so that was free too)....

Anyway, its only my opinion :)

Also, heres the neowin news that made frontpage.

https://www.neowin.net/comments.php?category=main&id=28726

586033413[/snapback]

all these articles dont matter since they probably come from the same source, opera

find us the article on pcworld

See? The argument will never end... :sleep:

Come on, get off it! Opera and Firefox are both cool, so is Maxthon. Why do we care about PCWorld's ranking? Use the browser you like and stop arguing!

By the way, I didn't say IE's not cool... (so did I say it's cool :rofl: )

Opera can do no wrong as long as they have the Black Ranger on their Web site.

MASTADON

But... He's white... and wears a red cape... and the costume is dark blue...? :blink: MASTODON! :laugh:

mmpr-rg-zack.jpg

Hehe, Rogue` the Firefox fan... Opera is actually the fastest browser ;)

Erm... not?

Let me explain this to you:

The Blender Comparation:

If I tell you that this blender is more powerful than that blender... then probably is, since they use the same source and can't be tweaked.

This is a decent comparation.

The Punch Comparation:

If I punch you, you would probably bleed and become dizzy.

But if you punch me, not only I would be okay, but I'll grab your arm and break it.

This is not a decent comparation. Why?

Because it depends on your health, your training and your psychological issues (I'm a ****ing psycho).

The same goes with browsers.

It would depend on:

  • * your machine
    * the way it's tweaked/optimized (or not)
    * your connection

So, you can't really tell which is THE fastest browser in the world, because of the factors I stated above.

If you had taken the time to actually read the speed test page, you would have seen that the goal was to be as objective as possible. So in general, Opera is the fastes browser.

I read it ages ago, good sir.

And I still say that those tests mean jack. It all depends in what I've said before.

@MellonCollie:

GREAT FIRST POST!

Welcome to Neowin!

prison.gif

As topic starter, I never personally said yes they are lying. Look at very first post I said IF its a mistake .. IF its deliberate, yea I made the topic title a little, excentric, but titles are suposed to be a headline to make people want to read the post. I never once got mad and called anyone a name or insulted anyone either.

That said, its over, they didn't win the award, the sites been changed, can't we all get along now ?

Maybe this fool should stop worrying about what others are doing and get back to Firefox. Not that I hate those 7 year old flaws that are reopened, I just think it's kind of childish to run into a slapping fight.

586035013[/snapback]

Word. I stopped having any respect for Asa the 3435363564th time he flamed on Opera. He must be the biggest, most heard of anti-Opera propagandist in the firefox community, and probably gets very excited any time he catches anything against Opera.

Now, according to what I've read so far it seems that PC World's categorization of awards appears to be not clearcut (mind you, not award themselves, but their categorization of awards), so that could definitely leave room for misinterpretation. However, it seems a bit wierd how, if this was deliberate, such a big thing like this was ignored by everyone else (inclung PCWorld, who should have contacted Opera to remove such claims) and suddenly a renowned firefox opera bashing boy comes out of nowhere to break the story, not saying that isn't possible.

I don't deny that this could be deliberate, eventhough I feel their browser is a solid damn product and it works best for me, shame on Opera if this was deliberate, or even negligent. Nonetheless, this could have been presented in a more professional manner so it doesn't come off as the author is a face slapping name basher, but hey! what can you expect from Asa?

Opera should simply explain their reasons, or just admit they are wrong, apologize, and simply move on, continue developing a better browser and not jumping on their toes over mistakes by firefox.

We've been on a winning streek lately, German magazine Chip concluding that Opera is better than Firefox and all. It seems that in the excitement over the positive press lately in combination with 8.01 release preparations, and with the summer heat finally arriving in Oslo, we've screwed up.

At closer inspection, it appears that Opera might not have won the best browser of 2005 award from PC World after all. Opera is listed as the only browser in the "Web" category, which I guess got us confused.

Now that we've installed fans to cool us down again, we've removed the "best browser" stuff from opera.com until PC World gets back to us to clarify things. We're posting a statement in the near future as well.

So no, we are not actually evil monsters. We are only human :smile:

http://my.opera.com/haavard/journal/52

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!