Opera named PC World best browser or not?


Recommended Posts

Yes, one of the categories was WEB, and as a "WEB BROWSER" Opera was the only one.

What I have demonstrated now is that there is clearly room for (mis)interpretation.

Asa knew this when he blogged about it. Why did he automatically assume that Opera was lying, when clearly there was room for making mistakes? Because it was a cheap shot, and he couldn't resist the temptation.

In other words: He accused Opera of lying knowing full well that it was probably just a misunderstanding. Unlike Opera, Asa's blog post was not a misunderstanding, because his posting history about Opera clearly shows that he takes any opportunity to put it down.

So if Asa claimed that Opera lied, but he did the same thing himself, what does that make Asa?

I think the word you are looking for here is hypocrite.

Until you can carry your argument beyond mere speculation, there is no basis for calling anyone a hypocrite.

The fact remains that the Opera website made a false/misleading claim, which has recently been removed. Your little personal "crusade" against Asa simply exposes your inability to cope with the mere thought that Opera is anything less than immaculate. :rolleyes:

xpgeek

how does this affect your live? ?_?

big deal... its like saying

Parents clealy lied to you about where babies come from when you were young. If its a mistake on their part its a pretty big, and stupid, one. If its deliberate, then shame on them. I'm their son but still respected them as my parents.

zz.ZZ

xpgeek

how does this affect your live? ?_?

big deal... its like saying

Parents clealy lied to you about where babies come from when you were young. If its a mistake on their part its a pretty big, and stupid, one. If its deliberate, then shame on them. I'm their son but still respected them as my parents.

zz.ZZ

586034109[/snapback]

It's false advertising, although it might not make your puppy eat your kitten still it's very serious in terms on business ethics, imagine you are choosing between a SonyEricsson phone and a Motorola, you like both very much and can't make the choice, in the end you end up buying the SonyEricsson simply because they say it got 5 oacar nominations, but in reality it did not.

Well, I've been trying to persuade people to stop arguing, but it certainly didn't work. :p Look at what section the topic's in - Back Page "NEWS". News is consisted of FACTS, and not to be argued. If a news article is being argued whether it's true or not, it's not a fact anymore. I think the topic has been lame all the way from the start, so I suggest the admins / mods to:

1) Lock the topic and stop this pointless argument.

And / or

2) Move this to "Web Browser Discussion".

I'm not attacking anyone personally, so am I trying to get myself flamed. I'm just trying to find a solution to end this argument.

Cheers everyone!

Hehe, Rogue` the Firefox fan... Opera is actually the fastest browser ;)

It's false advertising, although it might not make your puppy eat your kitten still it's very serious in terms on business ethics

What does making a mistake have to do with business ethics? You are listening to Asa, who is known to twist the truth to suit his agenda. He lies about Opera lying.

It was a simple mistake, as explained a thousand times by now.

Hehe, Rogue` the Firefox fan... Opera is actually the fastest browser ;)

What does making a mistake have to do with business ethics? You are listening to Asa, who is known to twist the truth to suit his agenda. He lies about Opera lying.

It was a simple mistake, as explained a thousand times by now.

586034398[/snapback]

Hehe, I wasnt being funny :p I go by my own experience, and i find on my PC Firefox runs better...and whats best is its free :) (although i found a keygen for opera, so that was free too)....

Anyway, its only my opinion :)

Also, heres the neowin news that made frontpage.

https://www.neowin.net/comments.php?category=main&id=28726

586033413[/snapback]

all these articles dont matter since they probably come from the same source, opera

find us the article on pcworld

See? The argument will never end... :sleep:

Come on, get off it! Opera and Firefox are both cool, so is Maxthon. Why do we care about PCWorld's ranking? Use the browser you like and stop arguing!

By the way, I didn't say IE's not cool... (so did I say it's cool :rofl: )

Opera can do no wrong as long as they have the Black Ranger on their Web site.

MASTADON

But... He's white... and wears a red cape... and the costume is dark blue...? :blink: MASTODON! :laugh:

mmpr-rg-zack.jpg

Hehe, Rogue` the Firefox fan... Opera is actually the fastest browser ;)

Erm... not?

Let me explain this to you:

The Blender Comparation:

If I tell you that this blender is more powerful than that blender... then probably is, since they use the same source and can't be tweaked.

This is a decent comparation.

The Punch Comparation:

If I punch you, you would probably bleed and become dizzy.

But if you punch me, not only I would be okay, but I'll grab your arm and break it.

This is not a decent comparation. Why?

Because it depends on your health, your training and your psychological issues (I'm a ****ing psycho).

The same goes with browsers.

It would depend on:

  • * your machine
    * the way it's tweaked/optimized (or not)
    * your connection

So, you can't really tell which is THE fastest browser in the world, because of the factors I stated above.

If you had taken the time to actually read the speed test page, you would have seen that the goal was to be as objective as possible. So in general, Opera is the fastes browser.

I read it ages ago, good sir.

And I still say that those tests mean jack. It all depends in what I've said before.

@MellonCollie:

GREAT FIRST POST!

Welcome to Neowin!

prison.gif

As topic starter, I never personally said yes they are lying. Look at very first post I said IF its a mistake .. IF its deliberate, yea I made the topic title a little, excentric, but titles are suposed to be a headline to make people want to read the post. I never once got mad and called anyone a name or insulted anyone either.

That said, its over, they didn't win the award, the sites been changed, can't we all get along now ?

Maybe this fool should stop worrying about what others are doing and get back to Firefox. Not that I hate those 7 year old flaws that are reopened, I just think it's kind of childish to run into a slapping fight.

586035013[/snapback]

Word. I stopped having any respect for Asa the 3435363564th time he flamed on Opera. He must be the biggest, most heard of anti-Opera propagandist in the firefox community, and probably gets very excited any time he catches anything against Opera.

Now, according to what I've read so far it seems that PC World's categorization of awards appears to be not clearcut (mind you, not award themselves, but their categorization of awards), so that could definitely leave room for misinterpretation. However, it seems a bit wierd how, if this was deliberate, such a big thing like this was ignored by everyone else (inclung PCWorld, who should have contacted Opera to remove such claims) and suddenly a renowned firefox opera bashing boy comes out of nowhere to break the story, not saying that isn't possible.

I don't deny that this could be deliberate, eventhough I feel their browser is a solid damn product and it works best for me, shame on Opera if this was deliberate, or even negligent. Nonetheless, this could have been presented in a more professional manner so it doesn't come off as the author is a face slapping name basher, but hey! what can you expect from Asa?

Opera should simply explain their reasons, or just admit they are wrong, apologize, and simply move on, continue developing a better browser and not jumping on their toes over mistakes by firefox.

We've been on a winning streek lately, German magazine Chip concluding that Opera is better than Firefox and all. It seems that in the excitement over the positive press lately in combination with 8.01 release preparations, and with the summer heat finally arriving in Oslo, we've screwed up.

At closer inspection, it appears that Opera might not have won the best browser of 2005 award from PC World after all. Opera is listed as the only browser in the "Web" category, which I guess got us confused.

Now that we've installed fans to cool us down again, we've removed the "best browser" stuff from opera.com until PC World gets back to us to clarify things. We're posting a statement in the near future as well.

So no, we are not actually evil monsters. We are only human :smile:

http://my.opera.com/haavard/journal/52

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!