Opera named PC World best browser or not?


Recommended Posts

Opera was named best browser, alright, after Firefox.?

http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,a...63,pg,12,00.asp

It's still good software, but I have not seen where PC World said it's better than Firefox anywhere.? Anyone got anything?

586033558[/snapback]

As previous posts said:

Opera 8

WEB BROWSER (Free) Find Firefox too austere? Opera is an attractive, feature-rich alternative. Review

Yes, one of the categories was WEB, and as a "WEB BROWSER" Opera was the only one.

What I have demonstrated now is that there is clearly room for (mis)interpretation.

Asa knew this when he blogged about it. Why did he automatically assume that Opera was lying, when clearly there was room for making mistakes? Because it was a cheap shot, and he couldn't resist the temptation.

In other words: He accused Opera of lying knowing full well that it was probably just a misunderstanding. Unlike Opera, Asa's blog post was not a misunderstanding, because his posting history about Opera clearly shows that he takes any opportunity to put it down.

So if Asa claimed that Opera lied, but he did the same thing himself, what does that make Asa?

Agree with this 100%.

Edited by yisman

^ did you read the retraction from opera?

"feature-rich alternatice" does not mean better

obviously if firefox got top billing, opera isn't the best browser of the year.

and there was one category called "web browser" which contained FF (1) and opera (88)

Clarification on PC World Awards 2005

Opera Software announced on June 3 that its desktop Web browser, Opera 8, has once again received PC World's World Class Award for best Web browser. This has caused some confusion due to the fact that a competing browser received the award as "Product of the Year".

PC World's World Class Awards each year acknowledges "the finest products and services" in different categories. In addition, one product or service receives the "Product of the Year" award. Last year, Opera received the award for "Best Browser". This year's categories are less specific. While Firefox was awarded "Product of the Year" this year, Opera 8 was the only full Web browser to receive an award in the "Web" category. Opera understands that this may have caused confusion.

Source: http://my.opera.com

I think everyone that knows me knows I'm a Firefox user (some may say fanboy) but come on, do you really think they would intentionally lie about something that is so easy to check on, And would turn out to be embarrassing to them at the same time. I don't believe it was intentional at all. No one is stupid enough to believe they could get by with it enough to do it intentionally. I love my Firefox, but Opera isn't a bad browser either, just not my preference.

Just my 2 cents.. which is worth nothing.

SUM UP:

Clarification on PC World Awards 2005

Opera Software announced on June 3 that its desktop Web browser, Opera 8, has once again received PC World's World Class Award for best Web browser. This has caused some confusion due to the fact that a competing browser received the award as "Product of the Year".

PC World's World Class Awards each year acknowledges "the finest products and services" in different categories. In addition, one product or service receives the "Product of the Year" award. Last year, Opera received the award for "Best Browser". This year's categories are less specific. While Firefox was awarded "Product of the Year" this year, Opera 8 was the only full Web browser to receive an award in the "Web" category. Opera understands that this may have caused confusion.

...and

Oops!

We've been on a winning streek lately, German magazine Chip concluding that Opera is better than Firefox and all. It seems that in the excitement over the positive press lately in combination with 8.01 release preparations, and with the summer heat finally arriving in Oslo, we've screwed up.

At closer inspection, it appears that Opera might not have won the best browser of 2005 award from PC World after all. Opera is listed as the only browser in the "Web" category, which I guess got us confused.

Now that we've installed fans to cool us down again, we've removed the "best browser" stuff from opera.com until PC World gets back to us to clarify things. We're posting a statement in the near future as well.

So no, we are not actually evil monsters. We are only human

...and...

June 8, 2005 11:08 AM PDT

Internecine warfare erupts over browser award

The browser blogs have exploded with ire, accusations and self-recriminations over the august and coveted PC World 100 Best Products of 2005 awards.

The mudslinging appears to have started when Opera issued a press release claiming to have won for "best browser." Mozilla staffer Asa Dotzler took exception to that claim, pointing out, along with some disparaging remarks about Opera's honesty, that Mozilla Firefox had won for "product of the year."

Dozens of flaming messages later, Opera issued a retraction and Dotzler was left defending his professionalism.

One peacemaker wrote: "Get some perspective will you? No one strangled your cat, OK? They're just browsers...software, right?"

What part of "browser war" doesn't this guy understand?

Posted by Paul Festa

Conclusion: Aza Dotzler is a <you know what think>

Does it matter if they lied?  Opera is still a stable product.  I mean how does claiming that their browser being named pc world's best browser make the product any better?

586033434[/snapback]

Yes, it does, because this would be the second marketing scam that they've used since the release of Opera 8.0. One of their developers claimed that he would swim from Norway to America if Opera 8.0 was downloaded 1,000,000 times within 4 days of the release. Downloads did hit that number, and they made up some bull**** story and he never ended up doing it. The only reason download numbers hit that high were because people wanted him to drown, so Opera would die. :p

Yes, it does, because this would be the second marketing scam that they've used since the release of Opera 8.0. One of their developers claimed that he would swim from Norway to America if Opera 8.0 was downloaded 1,000,000 times within 4 days of the release. Downloads did hit that number, and they made up some bull**** story and he never ended up doing it. The only reason download numbers hit that high were because people wanted him to drown, so Opera would die. :p

586038528[/snapback]

First of all, that was the C E O.

Second, anyone who didn't take that in jest should question themselves as a human being.

It's a shame Opera wasn't more careful about this, but everyone makes mistakes. No one was hurt, caused any damage, and no other products were lied about. They made an honest mistake regarding themselves.

But, whoever did make the mistake should no doubt get punished somehow.

And of course, Asa just had to post about it. He can't turn down a chance to spread FUD about Opera.

Umm, this is nothing new.  Opera has been lying for years.

Remember the whole MSN.com debacle?

586038537[/snapback]

Uh.. what did they lie about? Mind posting some proof?

Don't worry, I don't expect you to actually do so, since there isn't any.

Yes, it does, because this would be the second marketing scam that they've used since the release of Opera 8.0. One of their developers claimed that he would swim from Norway to America if Opera 8.0 was downloaded 1,000,000 times within 4 days of the release. Downloads did hit that number, and they made up some bull**** story and he never ended up doing it. The only reason download numbers hit that high were because people wanted him to drown, so Opera would die. :p

586038528[/snapback]

This was the reason I downloaded Opera, now i'm gonna uninstall their crappy browser, I like Firefox better anyhow.

least it doesn't have adware on it.

I hate companies that lie, I should file a complaint with the FTC, false claims of them being the best browser as voted by PC World magazine.

And the whole swim story too.

:angry:

Boycott Opera now, I'm removing my cracked version of Opera 8.0 as of now ! :D :woot:

By changing the site, I think that that's pretty much admitting the original was a lie.  Oh wait, I mean a "simple misunderstanding"...riiiiiight.  If you believe that one I got an ounce of invisible potion I'd like to sell you.

586038610[/snapback]

Microsoft has lied as well.

Mozilla Foundation has lied as well.

What company hasn't?

I'm not trying to justify what happened, but please put it into perspective.

Umm, this is nothing new.  Opera has been lying for years.

Remember the whole MSN.com debacle?

586038537[/snapback]

Proof please! Still waiting... :sleep:

By changing the site, I think that that's pretty much admitting the original was a lie.  Oh wait, I mean a "simple misunderstanding"...riiiiiight.  If you believe that one I got an ounce of invisible potion I'd like to sell you.

586038610[/snapback]

So by correcting a mistake, one is admitting that the mistake wasn't really a mistake after all?

Great logic there, imtoomuch! :no: :x

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Marshall Major V Bluetooth headphones are now up to 47% off on Amazon by Ivan Jenic The Marshall Major V in Midnight Blue is currently $89.99 on Amazon, down from $169.99. That's 47% off and $80 saved on a pair of wireless on-ear headphones from one of the most recognizable names in audio. The Major V is Marshall's take on a long-lasting everyday headphone. The headphones deliver 100+ hours of wireless playtime, which puts them in a completely different category from most Bluetooth headphones that hover around 30-40 hours. You’re charging this thing once a week at most, and with wireless charging supported, you don’t have to worry about additional cables. Marshall promises its signature sound profile, with strong bass, smooth mids, and clear highs. There’s a customizable M-button, which you can set to quickly access Spotify Tap, your EQ settings, or a voice assistant. The design is foldable and lightweight at 186 grams, so it’s easy to pack for travel. And finally, the faux leather finish gives the Major V a sleek, premium look. At $89.99, the Major V Midnight Blue is a genuinely strong buy for anyone who wants a reliable daily headphone without paying premium prices. It’s also worth mentioning that the Cream and Brown variants are also discounted to $89.99, though from a lower original price of $99.99. Marshall Major V Midnight Blue - $89.99 | 47% off on Amazon This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • +1 on XVI. I still use it. 
    • Age 16, old enough to get a full-time job, your own bank account, a passport, get married, even join the military and go to war. But talking to your friends on the internet? Oh hell no!
    • I remember when all games had demos; it was a normal thing, not a limited time promotion.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      483
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      122
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!