Opera named PC World best browser or not?


Recommended Posts

Opera was named best browser, alright, after Firefox.?

http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,a...63,pg,12,00.asp

It's still good software, but I have not seen where PC World said it's better than Firefox anywhere.? Anyone got anything?

586033558[/snapback]

As previous posts said:

Opera 8

WEB BROWSER (Free) Find Firefox too austere? Opera is an attractive, feature-rich alternative. Review

Yes, one of the categories was WEB, and as a "WEB BROWSER" Opera was the only one.

What I have demonstrated now is that there is clearly room for (mis)interpretation.

Asa knew this when he blogged about it. Why did he automatically assume that Opera was lying, when clearly there was room for making mistakes? Because it was a cheap shot, and he couldn't resist the temptation.

In other words: He accused Opera of lying knowing full well that it was probably just a misunderstanding. Unlike Opera, Asa's blog post was not a misunderstanding, because his posting history about Opera clearly shows that he takes any opportunity to put it down.

So if Asa claimed that Opera lied, but he did the same thing himself, what does that make Asa?

Agree with this 100%.

Edited by yisman

^ did you read the retraction from opera?

"feature-rich alternatice" does not mean better

obviously if firefox got top billing, opera isn't the best browser of the year.

and there was one category called "web browser" which contained FF (1) and opera (88)

Clarification on PC World Awards 2005

Opera Software announced on June 3 that its desktop Web browser, Opera 8, has once again received PC World's World Class Award for best Web browser. This has caused some confusion due to the fact that a competing browser received the award as "Product of the Year".

PC World's World Class Awards each year acknowledges "the finest products and services" in different categories. In addition, one product or service receives the "Product of the Year" award. Last year, Opera received the award for "Best Browser". This year's categories are less specific. While Firefox was awarded "Product of the Year" this year, Opera 8 was the only full Web browser to receive an award in the "Web" category. Opera understands that this may have caused confusion.

Source: http://my.opera.com

I think everyone that knows me knows I'm a Firefox user (some may say fanboy) but come on, do you really think they would intentionally lie about something that is so easy to check on, And would turn out to be embarrassing to them at the same time. I don't believe it was intentional at all. No one is stupid enough to believe they could get by with it enough to do it intentionally. I love my Firefox, but Opera isn't a bad browser either, just not my preference.

Just my 2 cents.. which is worth nothing.

SUM UP:

Clarification on PC World Awards 2005

Opera Software announced on June 3 that its desktop Web browser, Opera 8, has once again received PC World's World Class Award for best Web browser. This has caused some confusion due to the fact that a competing browser received the award as "Product of the Year".

PC World's World Class Awards each year acknowledges "the finest products and services" in different categories. In addition, one product or service receives the "Product of the Year" award. Last year, Opera received the award for "Best Browser". This year's categories are less specific. While Firefox was awarded "Product of the Year" this year, Opera 8 was the only full Web browser to receive an award in the "Web" category. Opera understands that this may have caused confusion.

...and

Oops!

We've been on a winning streek lately, German magazine Chip concluding that Opera is better than Firefox and all. It seems that in the excitement over the positive press lately in combination with 8.01 release preparations, and with the summer heat finally arriving in Oslo, we've screwed up.

At closer inspection, it appears that Opera might not have won the best browser of 2005 award from PC World after all. Opera is listed as the only browser in the "Web" category, which I guess got us confused.

Now that we've installed fans to cool us down again, we've removed the "best browser" stuff from opera.com until PC World gets back to us to clarify things. We're posting a statement in the near future as well.

So no, we are not actually evil monsters. We are only human

...and...

June 8, 2005 11:08 AM PDT

Internecine warfare erupts over browser award

The browser blogs have exploded with ire, accusations and self-recriminations over the august and coveted PC World 100 Best Products of 2005 awards.

The mudslinging appears to have started when Opera issued a press release claiming to have won for "best browser." Mozilla staffer Asa Dotzler took exception to that claim, pointing out, along with some disparaging remarks about Opera's honesty, that Mozilla Firefox had won for "product of the year."

Dozens of flaming messages later, Opera issued a retraction and Dotzler was left defending his professionalism.

One peacemaker wrote: "Get some perspective will you? No one strangled your cat, OK? They're just browsers...software, right?"

What part of "browser war" doesn't this guy understand?

Posted by Paul Festa

Conclusion: Aza Dotzler is a <you know what think>

Does it matter if they lied?  Opera is still a stable product.  I mean how does claiming that their browser being named pc world's best browser make the product any better?

586033434[/snapback]

Yes, it does, because this would be the second marketing scam that they've used since the release of Opera 8.0. One of their developers claimed that he would swim from Norway to America if Opera 8.0 was downloaded 1,000,000 times within 4 days of the release. Downloads did hit that number, and they made up some bull**** story and he never ended up doing it. The only reason download numbers hit that high were because people wanted him to drown, so Opera would die. :p

Yes, it does, because this would be the second marketing scam that they've used since the release of Opera 8.0. One of their developers claimed that he would swim from Norway to America if Opera 8.0 was downloaded 1,000,000 times within 4 days of the release. Downloads did hit that number, and they made up some bull**** story and he never ended up doing it. The only reason download numbers hit that high were because people wanted him to drown, so Opera would die. :p

586038528[/snapback]

First of all, that was the C E O.

Second, anyone who didn't take that in jest should question themselves as a human being.

It's a shame Opera wasn't more careful about this, but everyone makes mistakes. No one was hurt, caused any damage, and no other products were lied about. They made an honest mistake regarding themselves.

But, whoever did make the mistake should no doubt get punished somehow.

And of course, Asa just had to post about it. He can't turn down a chance to spread FUD about Opera.

Umm, this is nothing new.  Opera has been lying for years.

Remember the whole MSN.com debacle?

586038537[/snapback]

Uh.. what did they lie about? Mind posting some proof?

Don't worry, I don't expect you to actually do so, since there isn't any.

Yes, it does, because this would be the second marketing scam that they've used since the release of Opera 8.0. One of their developers claimed that he would swim from Norway to America if Opera 8.0 was downloaded 1,000,000 times within 4 days of the release. Downloads did hit that number, and they made up some bull**** story and he never ended up doing it. The only reason download numbers hit that high were because people wanted him to drown, so Opera would die. :p

586038528[/snapback]

This was the reason I downloaded Opera, now i'm gonna uninstall their crappy browser, I like Firefox better anyhow.

least it doesn't have adware on it.

I hate companies that lie, I should file a complaint with the FTC, false claims of them being the best browser as voted by PC World magazine.

And the whole swim story too.

:angry:

Boycott Opera now, I'm removing my cracked version of Opera 8.0 as of now ! :D :woot:

By changing the site, I think that that's pretty much admitting the original was a lie.  Oh wait, I mean a "simple misunderstanding"...riiiiiight.  If you believe that one I got an ounce of invisible potion I'd like to sell you.

586038610[/snapback]

Microsoft has lied as well.

Mozilla Foundation has lied as well.

What company hasn't?

I'm not trying to justify what happened, but please put it into perspective.

Umm, this is nothing new.  Opera has been lying for years.

Remember the whole MSN.com debacle?

586038537[/snapback]

Proof please! Still waiting... :sleep:

By changing the site, I think that that's pretty much admitting the original was a lie.  Oh wait, I mean a "simple misunderstanding"...riiiiiight.  If you believe that one I got an ounce of invisible potion I'd like to sell you.

586038610[/snapback]

So by correcting a mistake, one is admitting that the mistake wasn't really a mistake after all?

Great logic there, imtoomuch! :no: :x

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My issue is I can't access the forum on mobile if the site is set to Desktop mode on Vivaldi because it can't complete the Cloud flare am I a bot check! I know this is a Vivaldi issues as it has started happening on all cloud flare check sites, it's so annoying, I've reported it but no fix yet.
    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!