Opera named PC World best browser or not?


Recommended Posts

Proof please! Still waiting... :sleep:

586038863[/snapback]

Umm that did happen, there was no lie there. Microsft had been using the user agent string of lots of browsers to make thier sites look better in IE than the competitors.

Whether you believe Microsoft did it to intentionally make Opera look retarded, or they just did it out of ignorance, either way that doesn't put MS in a good light. In my opinion MS must have done it malicously because to make another version of the page just for Opera that was buggered, while Opera could actually render the standard version just fine, is a level of incompetence I don't want to believe Microsoft posseses.

Whether you believe Microsoft did it to intentionally make Opera look retarded, or they just did it out of ignorance, either way that doesn't put MS in a good light.  In my opinion MS must have done it malicously because to make another version of the page just for Opera that was buggered, while Opera could actually render the standard version just fine, is a level of incompetence I don't want to believe Microsoft posseses.

586039205[/snapback]

NO. Reread what the guy originally said. He accused OPERA of lying, NOT microsoft.

Hehe, Rogue` the Firefox fan... Opera is actually the fastest browser ;)

What does making a mistake have to do with business ethics? You are listening to Asa, who is known to twist the truth to suit his agenda. He lies about Opera lying.

It was a simple mistake, as explained a thousand times by now.

586034398[/snapback]

You guys are unbelievable, of course it's an honest mistake when Opera does it.. it's only lying and marketing tricks when it's done by the MoFo.

You really should at least have the balls to admid that Opera was wrong.

Edit: Disclaimer: Sorry if I remember wrong (the above post was made in assumption that you are one of the fan boys that were spouting how much they hate MoFo because they LIE! in the Firefox vs. Opera 100 page thread).

Edited by Elendil

First off, if you think they did this on purpose, you're kind of silly. When you lie, you make sure it's hard to disprove, not disgustingly easy.

That said, here is where Opera was named the best Web Browser of 2004. That link is direct from PC World. There can be no doubt. It says "Best of 2004" at the top of the page, and it's shown under the "Web Browser" category. That's why they say they're the best Web Browser of 2004.

In 2005, while Firefox was named the best overall product, Opera was named the best web browser. That's from here. If you can't see how that's confusing and insist that Opera was purposely lying... well, your phanboi is showing.

This post pretty much clarifies and condenses everything that's been said; it's a shame everyone will ignore it while typing up their diatribes.

Are you referring to "Firefox empowers you to browse faster, more safely and more efficiently than with any other browser"? (source) :D

586039188[/snapback]

Well you got to lie a littlebit.... That's how you market a product. You don't say "Our product is second!".

One thing you don't do is advertise false claims/facts. Saying that your product "is the best" (in all the variations that you can find) is allowed. Saying "we're the best because we won an award" when that's false isn't.

haha opera has recanted there statement as receiving the award for best browser. even changed there home page and made a comment on Asa's blog

WAS:

opera0xw.jpg

NOW:

opera-lied.jpg

586034904[/snapback]

LOL owned anyways everyone commit a mistake so not a big deal we all know that firefox and oepra are both great browsers now if ie won the best brwoser award then it would be a caos in this forum lol. :sleep:

so in conclusion, opera was wrong, firefox won the title of best product and best browser.

thread closed...for the love of god.

586040676[/snapback]

Firefox won best product not best web browser:

link

these is a diffrence, but it does sound strange, you think best product would also carry best browser, but no.

now i cant find anything on the PC world web site that says who is the best browser, the cloest is the the WEB list LINK

If opera lied about something like this Im sure PC World would have said something by now, so who knows. Email PC world and find out what up instead of running around posting like chickens who had their heads cut off.

and about the Opera guy swiming because Opera had a certain number of downloads...get over it, you think anyone would do it, if your mad cause he didnt plz back away from the computer and read a book until you can handel a joke and stop taking stuff so seriously.

It's hilarious how my post actually explained what happened but was ignored so that you all could say that Opera worships Satan and the makers of Firefox are, collectively, the reincarnation of Mother Teresa, Gandhi and Jesus rolled into one. :rolleyes:

PC World doesn't specifically name one product "Best" category x anymore--with the exception of "Best Product"*. All they did was list the Top 100, and then put the Top 100 into 11 different web pages under headings like "Web," "Storage and Backup," "Mobile Tools" etc. Firefox wasn't put on the "Web" page because they already listed it under another page, the "Best Product" page.

Web Browser

Mozilla Firefox

Opera

VOIP Service:

Skype

Vonage

Instant Messenger:

Qnext

Trillian

Portable Hard Drive:

Seagate USB 2.0 Pocket Drive

CMS 80GB USB 2.0 ABSplus Notebook Backup System

And so on.

So answer me, who won "Best VOIP" Service? Who won "Best Instant Messenger"? Who won "Best Porable Hard Drive." "Best Digital Camera?" You can only refer to the Top 100 and list what rank they were awarded.

* I did also notice one specifically for Best Accounting Software or something. Okay the name of the product is "Best Software's Simply Accounting," so it really isn't one. The company calls itself "Best Software." :rofl:

Edited by Fotix

The watchful eye of bloggers has once again stirred controversy. A press release issued by Opera Software claimed that Opera 8 won PC World's 2005 World Class Award for best Web browser only to be harshly refuted by the Mozilla Foundation's Asa Dotzler who is recognized as the Firefox and Thunderbird product manager.

The press release, which has since been corrected, prompted Dotzler to say with an acid pen, "Opera is simply lying. They were one of 100 products to be labeled as "World Class" but they did not win any "best Web browser" anything. They were last in the ranking of three web browsers. They got beat by both Maxthon and Firefox."

Dotzler also asserted browser bragging rights, stating that it was Firefox that had won the magazine's Product of the Year award. "Opera Software seems to have decided that it's easier to lie than to win," he said.

[...]

Read the whole story here:

http://www.betanews.com/article/Award_Clai...lash/1118436090

Opera did not win the best browser award and they did not intentionally lie about it either. Opera Software is packed with very intelligent people. If Opera Software wanted to promote their software by lying then I gaurantee that the lie wouldn't be shot down as quickly as this mistake was. They did receive a world class product award, so why would they intentionally lie about winning another award just to be shot down a week or two later and take the risk of hurting their public image? The answer: They wouldn't. It was an honest mistake, nothing more.

Asa Dotzler over-reacted to the situation. As a Firefox/Thunderbird product manager, I can understand that he would be a little upset over a mistake like this but publishing articles calling Opera Software liars is a bit extreme. After falsely accusing Opera Software of intentionally lying, we have not seen any apologies from him nor a mention of his reaction being a mistake. As someone who assumes himself to be taking the higher road of morality I expected Asa to at least mention that his claims were a mistake.

Just my opinion on the matter.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!