I Switched to from Windows to OSX


Recommended Posts

Well I tried overclocking but it isn't working. Were do I put the pins for 450 mhz? and were do I put the pins for 500mhz? help dude I dont get the article im that dumb :(

586086879[/snapback]

Guy just put the machine back together and use it. You can research on the internet and then tear it apart when you have a game plan.

The point of this matchine is to play with. Thats what I am doing playing with it. May it be overclocking/upgrading or just playing with the OS :)

Thats the only reason I got this system. I got really tired of windows and want something new. Playing with the system in and out helps me learn more about it. thats how I learn about pcs.

Well I had a...

Amd Athlon 1900+

768 PC2100 Ram

80 GB HD

Windows XP Pro SP2

Will now have

G3 400mhz

256 Ram

10 GB HD

Great, now you can enjoy a much slower pc with no games to play on.

Congratulations! No seriously, why an old G3 400 mhz? And why not keep your x86 pc besides it? :wacko: Was it a literary switch?

Not on a 400 Mhz G3 it won't.

At least his performance will be way better than

PearPC.

I still have it. Sold it to my mom. She just wants it to surf the net. I dont play games I just use it to design and surft the net. And I wanted to do the complete switch because I am tired of windows. There is nothing I can't do in the Mac I can't do in windows.

Before trying to overclock or upgrade the processor, perhaps you should consider some of the basic steps to improve performance such as maxing out the RAM (using the correct type for your specific model instead of something which "might work".)

If you think you already have, check your System Profiler to make sure the G3 is actually registering, and therefore utilizing, the amount you believe is in there.

Another good idea which will definitely increase the responsiveness and stability of your G3 would be to add a Mac ATA-133 card like this one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...N82E16816123110.

BTW, from what were you running the "clean install" that resulted in the weird password prompt?

(or how do _you_ define "clean install"? What was the process, and why didn't you just install a fresh OS on the new drive?)

The point of this matchine is to play with. Thats what I am doing playing with it. May it be overclocking/upgrading or just playing with the OS :)

Thats the only reason I got this system. I got really tired of windows and want something new. Playing with the system in and out helps me learn more about it. thats how I learn about pcs.

586086969[/snapback]

Sorry, your frequent and urgent posts led me to believe that you were in dire straights. Have fun playing with it.

How about this guys?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...item=5783329258

or

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...5783548197&rd=1

also found some ram. Will this ram work...

1 -- http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...5784348358&rd=1

2 -- http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...5784296960&rd=1

will that sucker work on my G3? Black & White? If so please advise so I can buy it now :)

Thanks!

Edited by zerolimit

SHOWS that its compatible. only diff. is the pc133. intstead of pc100. It says on the ebay link that its compatible for my G3? Anyone have any feedback on this ram? Would really help me alot. Also on the cpu. Thanks!

Installing the ram is easy! I've build most of the pcs at home so thats easy!

SHOWS that its compatible. only diff. is the pc133. intstead of pc100. It says on the ebay link that its compatible for my G3? Anyone have any feedback on this ram? Would really help me alot. Also on the cpu. Thanks!

Installing the ram is easy! I've build most of the pcs at home so thats easy!

586108016[/snapback]

Neither of those CPU's will work in your machine. The later model G4's have a different type of socket than your G3 does. The only G4's that will work in your system are the upgrade cards that I gave you links for the other day. The second piece of RAM you linked to would definitely work, since it was pulled from the same type of system that you have. The first could go either way.

DAM!! I didn't want to spend $200+ for a cpu. $100 ya but $200+ I  was looking into 100$ maybe but im gona buy the second ram hopefully it work =) if anyone knows for sure please advise thanks!

586108324[/snapback]

The RAM will do nearly as much for you as the CPU upgrade would, honestly. I have my Blue & White maxed out (the most it will hold is 1GB), and while it only has a 600Mhz G4, it is far faster than my 800Mhz G3 iBook which only has 384MB of RAM, even on non-Altivec apps.

WTF hahaha,

Expose

CoreImage

Widgets

Spotlight

Drag & Drop installs

No Viruses/Spyware/Malware

Unix Base

All these things & 300+ other features just don't come into it at all I suppose??:laugh::

586044037[/snapback]

Expose - I have alt tab on my windows box and multiple desktops on my linux box.

CoreImage - Ok. I got a geforce 6800 gt, OC. Thats terrific.

Widgets - www.konfabulator.com (oh and it doesnt take over your whole desktop)

Spotlight - this is actually pretty good. I use it at work on my mac box frequently.

Drag & Drop installs - for those of you that aren't content to hit next a few times.

No Viruses/Spyware/Malware - Wahahahahah!!! So funny!

Unix Base - So is linux... your point?

I run my widgets on my windows xp box and i run full blown fedora core on another box... and both machines together cost less than a mac. Also, I'm sorry, but there are viruses out there, but you can live in your fantasy land... the fact that they arent as wide spread as windows viruses doesnt mean anything.

Biased? No. I do use a Mac at work. Do I enjoy it? Not really. I have to support the machines every day. I hate things about them like the fact that the interface is really flashy and in your face, I can't just press ctrl + c (makes things confusing when going between windows and linux, then to a mac... no, I gotta press Apple + c), and the whole system feels sluggish to me... but maybe thats because I'm on an older g4 tower here. I guess if I really want to indulge in the whole "Mac Experience" as you folks like to call it, I might need a G5 tower, but for the cost of one of those I could get like 2 full blown IBM Servers (yes, I'm exaggerating) and use them as a rendering hive in 3d studio max. Oh, btw, I do lots of graphic design work, and guess what I prefer to do it on.....

It just drives me nuts when someone makes insane claims about Macs... they are not really superior systems, they are just there for a cult of mac users who prefer using one button mice. If you like them, fine, but dont go making wild accusations about the capabilities of these machines because it is just rediculous.

edit...

and to the OP. Congrats on the switch. Seriously. Some people can't go from one to the other... they just can't. They get too set in their ways to want to switch. I think that if you like the interface, you will like the mac. I would suggest getting yourself a nice logitech mouse though and perhaps if you like the system enough then step up to a better machine. I have OS9 and OSX here at work and OSX is worlds better than OS9... in fact, I dont even turn my OS9 box on anymore. I hope you do enjoy it. Oh, and I use a mac keyboard on my PC.:pp

Expose - I have alt tab on my windows box and multiple desktops on my linux box.

CoreImage - Ok.  I got a geforce 6800 gt, OC.  Thats terrific.

Widgets - www.konfabulator.com (oh and it doesnt take over your whole desktop)

Spotlight - this is actually pretty good.  I use it at work on my mac box frequently.

Drag & Drop installs - for those of you that aren't content to hit next a few times.

No Viruses/Spyware/Malware - Wahahahahah!!!  So funny!

Unix Base - So is linux... your point?

I won't even go into how silly some of your comparisons are. Most of them show that you have almost no experience at all with OS X, despite your claims that you do.

Also, I'm sorry, but there are viruses out there, but you can live in your fantasy land... the fact that they arent as wide spread as windows viruses doesnt mean anything.

Oh yeah smart guy? Show me ONE virus that affects OS X. Just one. Can you? Didn't think so.

I can't just press ctrl + c (makes things confusing when going between windows and linux, then to a mac... no, I gotta press Apple + c),

Well, since the Mac had that shortcut before Windows or Linux existed, I'd say that those were the ones that got it wrong (they had to, since non-Apple computers don't have an Apple key).

and the whole system feels sluggish to me... but maybe thats because I'm on an older g4 tower here.  I guess if I really want to indulge in the whole "Mac Experience" as you folks like to call it, I might need a G5 tower,

Look at the specs of my machines. Neither of them seem "sluggish" to me.

It just drives me nuts when someone makes insane claims about Macs... they are not really superior systems, they are just there for a cult of mac users who prefer using one button mice.  If you like them, fine, but dont go making wild accusations about the capabilities of these machines because it is just rediculous.

586108817[/snapback]

The person you quoted mad no "insane claims" about the Mac. They simply pointed out some of the reasons that someone might want to switch. Oh, and I (along with most others here) use a multi-button mouse with my Macs. Not that we have to, since the interface is designed for single button use, but it makes some shortcuts easier to get to.

It seems that YOU are the one making "wild accusations", not the person you quoted.

well back to the subject. I bought the ones you said would work. 2 128 so its a total of 512 ram. Should that make it fast enought to do some things here and there? or should I get 1 more?

586109091[/snapback]

That should be fine. My iBook only has 384MB and I use it daily. If you have the money to spare, then yeah, get more, but remember you only have 4 slots in there.

I would need to find one that is 512 Ram. Anyone know were I can get that? cheap?

586109555[/snapback]

Your machine won't take DIMMs in that size. The largest size it will take is 256MB (which is why the limit on it is 1GB = 4x256MB).

I won't even go into how silly some of your comparisons are.  Most of them show that you have almost no experience at all with OS X, despite your claims that you do.

My point that I was trying to illustrate is that the Mac doesnt have any super features or things that can't be done on a PC. Your failure to realize this bewilders me as even a 2 year old can grasp this concept... a yellow apple and a red apple differ in appearance, yet, both are apples, and both are just as good. If you prefer red apples to green apples, that is your thing.

Oh yeah smart guy?  Show me ONE virus that affects OS X.  Just one.  Can you?  Didn't think so.

Do a little research, I did. I found ONE virus. There will be others as soon as people start feeling malicious enough. Why else would companies make anti-virus software? For you. Smart Guy. Now, I feel it important to note that although there is a lack of viruses available for the Mac, there is also a lack of lots of things. There is spyware to (Little Snitch) and I'm sure there is Adware to, as the Mac OS is not some superior operating system... why else would Apple release security patches?

Well, since the Mac had that shortcut before Windows or Linux existed, I'd say that those were the ones that got it wrong (they had to, since non-Apple computers don't have an Apple key).

I'll give you that. I do recall using Mac computers when I was in 3rd grade and having to use the apple key, now that I think about it. That particular reference was mostly a matter of preference on my part, and not really a fault of Apple... only a poor example of the annoying lack of cross compatability in many aspects of the Mac vs. the PC.

Look at the specs of my machines.  Neither of them seem "sluggish" to me. 

The person you quoted mad no "insane claims" about the Mac.  They simply pointed out some of the reasons that someone might want to switch.  Oh, and I (along with most others here) use a multi-button mouse with my Macs.  Not that we have to, since the interface is designed for single button use, but it makes some shortcuts easier to get to.

The feel that I got from the post I quoted was that those were all great features that would make the Mac so much better than everything out there, especially when the only really good thing in the list was Spotlight, which I feel is even better than the google desktop search for PC. Multi button mice should just be something that is included with the system at this point. It is silly, especially when working in photoshop and illustrator. It's so nice to have a right click for changing certain properties and using a secondary color. I agree that the design of the interface for the Mac is good with one button mice, but I think that most applications out there benifit greatly from 2 or more button mice.

It seems that YOU are the one making "wild accusations", not the person you quoted.

Your lack of being able to tell me what specifically was wrong with my first list of statements just goes to show how you really can't argue with what I said... things like expose and drag and drop installs are nice, but not a reason to switch to the Mac. I don't see what there is to argue with what I was saying. I thought I made my point quite clear... there are lots of things that OSX has that aren't that special, even though Mac folk like to claim they are genius. I mean seriously, desktop widget-type-things have been out there since Active Desktop for windows (and they were in HTML!) and then there was stuff like samurize and konfabulator (now on Mac and PC) and Apple has decided to jump on the bandwagon and add their own widgets, but after having checked it out, I really don't like it because it takes over your whole desktop with the black backdrop there. Widgets should float on your desktop without running a whole screen ordeal. Oh well, I guess some people are just in denial about their operating systems and have never gotten out from under a rock and checked out the software and hardware out there, or maybe I'm just perfectly happy with my inferior operating systems...

Your machine won't take DIMMs in that size.  The largest size it will take is 256MB (which is why the limit on it is 1GB = 4x256MB).

586109701[/snapback]

Oh!!! ok ill just buy another 256 then. Thanks. but so far I love my mac. :)

woot woot!

next a G5 !!! :woot:

Oh!!! ok ill just buy another 256 then. Thanks. but so far I love my mac. :)

woot woot!

next a G5 !!!  :woot:

586109817[/snapback]

Tons of memory is always a good thing! I say pack in as much as you possibly can! Glad you like your Mac.

Changing some jumpers is "crazy stuff"?  That's a fairly standard way of doing things on older machines.

586081650[/snapback]

Thing is it doesn't say were to put the jumpers roadwarrior. I have a 400mhz machine right now. I want to pump it up to 450 mhz atleast. were should I put the jumpers. for that? Let me know so I can do it tonight. I didn't really understand that article! Sorry I guess im not good at that.

Thing is it doesn't say were to put the jumpers roadwarrior. I have a 400mhz machine right now. I want to pump it up to 450 mhz atleast. were should I put the jumpers. for that? Let me know so I can do it tonight. I didn't really understand that article! Sorry I guess im not good at that.

586109835[/snapback]

Dude, that article couldn't be any clearer. I'll quote the relevant part here:

Next, you need to change the upper four jumpers. If you wish to set your processor to 350 MHz, insert a jumper on the uppermost set. If you wish to bump your processor to 400 MHz, insert one on the first and third jumper sets. If you wish to over clock to 450 MHz, insert a jumper on the fourth (farthest from you) set. And to try the 500 MHz speed, insert a jumper on the third set of pins.

  CPU Speeds Listed Assume 100 MHz (default) Bus Speed

    (S = Jumper present or "Set", " " = no jumper)

            Multiple     | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            3x   300 MHz |   | S | S | S |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            3.5x 350 MHz |   |   |   | S |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            4x   400 MHz |   | S |   | S |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            4.5x 450 MHz | S |   |   |   |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            5x   500 MHz |   | S |   |   |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!