I Switched to from Windows to OSX


Recommended Posts

Well I tried overclocking but it isn't working. Were do I put the pins for 450 mhz? and were do I put the pins for 500mhz? help dude I dont get the article im that dumb :(

586086879[/snapback]

Guy just put the machine back together and use it. You can research on the internet and then tear it apart when you have a game plan.

The point of this matchine is to play with. Thats what I am doing playing with it. May it be overclocking/upgrading or just playing with the OS :)

Thats the only reason I got this system. I got really tired of windows and want something new. Playing with the system in and out helps me learn more about it. thats how I learn about pcs.

Well I had a...

Amd Athlon 1900+

768 PC2100 Ram

80 GB HD

Windows XP Pro SP2

Will now have

G3 400mhz

256 Ram

10 GB HD

Great, now you can enjoy a much slower pc with no games to play on.

Congratulations! No seriously, why an old G3 400 mhz? And why not keep your x86 pc besides it? :wacko: Was it a literary switch?

Not on a 400 Mhz G3 it won't.

At least his performance will be way better than

PearPC.

I still have it. Sold it to my mom. She just wants it to surf the net. I dont play games I just use it to design and surft the net. And I wanted to do the complete switch because I am tired of windows. There is nothing I can't do in the Mac I can't do in windows.

Before trying to overclock or upgrade the processor, perhaps you should consider some of the basic steps to improve performance such as maxing out the RAM (using the correct type for your specific model instead of something which "might work".)

If you think you already have, check your System Profiler to make sure the G3 is actually registering, and therefore utilizing, the amount you believe is in there.

Another good idea which will definitely increase the responsiveness and stability of your G3 would be to add a Mac ATA-133 card like this one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...N82E16816123110.

BTW, from what were you running the "clean install" that resulted in the weird password prompt?

(or how do _you_ define "clean install"? What was the process, and why didn't you just install a fresh OS on the new drive?)

The point of this matchine is to play with. Thats what I am doing playing with it. May it be overclocking/upgrading or just playing with the OS :)

Thats the only reason I got this system. I got really tired of windows and want something new. Playing with the system in and out helps me learn more about it. thats how I learn about pcs.

586086969[/snapback]

Sorry, your frequent and urgent posts led me to believe that you were in dire straights. Have fun playing with it.

How about this guys?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...item=5783329258

or

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...5783548197&rd=1

also found some ram. Will this ram work...

1 -- http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...5784348358&rd=1

2 -- http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...5784296960&rd=1

will that sucker work on my G3? Black & White? If so please advise so I can buy it now :)

Thanks!

Edited by zerolimit

SHOWS that its compatible. only diff. is the pc133. intstead of pc100. It says on the ebay link that its compatible for my G3? Anyone have any feedback on this ram? Would really help me alot. Also on the cpu. Thanks!

Installing the ram is easy! I've build most of the pcs at home so thats easy!

SHOWS that its compatible. only diff. is the pc133. intstead of pc100. It says on the ebay link that its compatible for my G3? Anyone have any feedback on this ram? Would really help me alot. Also on the cpu. Thanks!

Installing the ram is easy! I've build most of the pcs at home so thats easy!

586108016[/snapback]

Neither of those CPU's will work in your machine. The later model G4's have a different type of socket than your G3 does. The only G4's that will work in your system are the upgrade cards that I gave you links for the other day. The second piece of RAM you linked to would definitely work, since it was pulled from the same type of system that you have. The first could go either way.

DAM!! I didn't want to spend $200+ for a cpu. $100 ya but $200+ I  was looking into 100$ maybe but im gona buy the second ram hopefully it work =) if anyone knows for sure please advise thanks!

586108324[/snapback]

The RAM will do nearly as much for you as the CPU upgrade would, honestly. I have my Blue & White maxed out (the most it will hold is 1GB), and while it only has a 600Mhz G4, it is far faster than my 800Mhz G3 iBook which only has 384MB of RAM, even on non-Altivec apps.

WTF hahaha,

Expose

CoreImage

Widgets

Spotlight

Drag & Drop installs

No Viruses/Spyware/Malware

Unix Base

All these things & 300+ other features just don't come into it at all I suppose??:laugh::

586044037[/snapback]

Expose - I have alt tab on my windows box and multiple desktops on my linux box.

CoreImage - Ok. I got a geforce 6800 gt, OC. Thats terrific.

Widgets - www.konfabulator.com (oh and it doesnt take over your whole desktop)

Spotlight - this is actually pretty good. I use it at work on my mac box frequently.

Drag & Drop installs - for those of you that aren't content to hit next a few times.

No Viruses/Spyware/Malware - Wahahahahah!!! So funny!

Unix Base - So is linux... your point?

I run my widgets on my windows xp box and i run full blown fedora core on another box... and both machines together cost less than a mac. Also, I'm sorry, but there are viruses out there, but you can live in your fantasy land... the fact that they arent as wide spread as windows viruses doesnt mean anything.

Biased? No. I do use a Mac at work. Do I enjoy it? Not really. I have to support the machines every day. I hate things about them like the fact that the interface is really flashy and in your face, I can't just press ctrl + c (makes things confusing when going between windows and linux, then to a mac... no, I gotta press Apple + c), and the whole system feels sluggish to me... but maybe thats because I'm on an older g4 tower here. I guess if I really want to indulge in the whole "Mac Experience" as you folks like to call it, I might need a G5 tower, but for the cost of one of those I could get like 2 full blown IBM Servers (yes, I'm exaggerating) and use them as a rendering hive in 3d studio max. Oh, btw, I do lots of graphic design work, and guess what I prefer to do it on.....

It just drives me nuts when someone makes insane claims about Macs... they are not really superior systems, they are just there for a cult of mac users who prefer using one button mice. If you like them, fine, but dont go making wild accusations about the capabilities of these machines because it is just rediculous.

edit...

and to the OP. Congrats on the switch. Seriously. Some people can't go from one to the other... they just can't. They get too set in their ways to want to switch. I think that if you like the interface, you will like the mac. I would suggest getting yourself a nice logitech mouse though and perhaps if you like the system enough then step up to a better machine. I have OS9 and OSX here at work and OSX is worlds better than OS9... in fact, I dont even turn my OS9 box on anymore. I hope you do enjoy it. Oh, and I use a mac keyboard on my PC.:pp

Expose - I have alt tab on my windows box and multiple desktops on my linux box.

CoreImage - Ok.  I got a geforce 6800 gt, OC.  Thats terrific.

Widgets - www.konfabulator.com (oh and it doesnt take over your whole desktop)

Spotlight - this is actually pretty good.  I use it at work on my mac box frequently.

Drag & Drop installs - for those of you that aren't content to hit next a few times.

No Viruses/Spyware/Malware - Wahahahahah!!!  So funny!

Unix Base - So is linux... your point?

I won't even go into how silly some of your comparisons are. Most of them show that you have almost no experience at all with OS X, despite your claims that you do.

Also, I'm sorry, but there are viruses out there, but you can live in your fantasy land... the fact that they arent as wide spread as windows viruses doesnt mean anything.

Oh yeah smart guy? Show me ONE virus that affects OS X. Just one. Can you? Didn't think so.

I can't just press ctrl + c (makes things confusing when going between windows and linux, then to a mac... no, I gotta press Apple + c),

Well, since the Mac had that shortcut before Windows or Linux existed, I'd say that those were the ones that got it wrong (they had to, since non-Apple computers don't have an Apple key).

and the whole system feels sluggish to me... but maybe thats because I'm on an older g4 tower here.  I guess if I really want to indulge in the whole "Mac Experience" as you folks like to call it, I might need a G5 tower,

Look at the specs of my machines. Neither of them seem "sluggish" to me.

It just drives me nuts when someone makes insane claims about Macs... they are not really superior systems, they are just there for a cult of mac users who prefer using one button mice.  If you like them, fine, but dont go making wild accusations about the capabilities of these machines because it is just rediculous.

586108817[/snapback]

The person you quoted mad no "insane claims" about the Mac. They simply pointed out some of the reasons that someone might want to switch. Oh, and I (along with most others here) use a multi-button mouse with my Macs. Not that we have to, since the interface is designed for single button use, but it makes some shortcuts easier to get to.

It seems that YOU are the one making "wild accusations", not the person you quoted.

well back to the subject. I bought the ones you said would work. 2 128 so its a total of 512 ram. Should that make it fast enought to do some things here and there? or should I get 1 more?

586109091[/snapback]

That should be fine. My iBook only has 384MB and I use it daily. If you have the money to spare, then yeah, get more, but remember you only have 4 slots in there.

I would need to find one that is 512 Ram. Anyone know were I can get that? cheap?

586109555[/snapback]

Your machine won't take DIMMs in that size. The largest size it will take is 256MB (which is why the limit on it is 1GB = 4x256MB).

I won't even go into how silly some of your comparisons are.  Most of them show that you have almost no experience at all with OS X, despite your claims that you do.

My point that I was trying to illustrate is that the Mac doesnt have any super features or things that can't be done on a PC. Your failure to realize this bewilders me as even a 2 year old can grasp this concept... a yellow apple and a red apple differ in appearance, yet, both are apples, and both are just as good. If you prefer red apples to green apples, that is your thing.

Oh yeah smart guy?  Show me ONE virus that affects OS X.  Just one.  Can you?  Didn't think so.

Do a little research, I did. I found ONE virus. There will be others as soon as people start feeling malicious enough. Why else would companies make anti-virus software? For you. Smart Guy. Now, I feel it important to note that although there is a lack of viruses available for the Mac, there is also a lack of lots of things. There is spyware to (Little Snitch) and I'm sure there is Adware to, as the Mac OS is not some superior operating system... why else would Apple release security patches?

Well, since the Mac had that shortcut before Windows or Linux existed, I'd say that those were the ones that got it wrong (they had to, since non-Apple computers don't have an Apple key).

I'll give you that. I do recall using Mac computers when I was in 3rd grade and having to use the apple key, now that I think about it. That particular reference was mostly a matter of preference on my part, and not really a fault of Apple... only a poor example of the annoying lack of cross compatability in many aspects of the Mac vs. the PC.

Look at the specs of my machines.  Neither of them seem "sluggish" to me. 

The person you quoted mad no "insane claims" about the Mac.  They simply pointed out some of the reasons that someone might want to switch.  Oh, and I (along with most others here) use a multi-button mouse with my Macs.  Not that we have to, since the interface is designed for single button use, but it makes some shortcuts easier to get to.

The feel that I got from the post I quoted was that those were all great features that would make the Mac so much better than everything out there, especially when the only really good thing in the list was Spotlight, which I feel is even better than the google desktop search for PC. Multi button mice should just be something that is included with the system at this point. It is silly, especially when working in photoshop and illustrator. It's so nice to have a right click for changing certain properties and using a secondary color. I agree that the design of the interface for the Mac is good with one button mice, but I think that most applications out there benifit greatly from 2 or more button mice.

It seems that YOU are the one making "wild accusations", not the person you quoted.

Your lack of being able to tell me what specifically was wrong with my first list of statements just goes to show how you really can't argue with what I said... things like expose and drag and drop installs are nice, but not a reason to switch to the Mac. I don't see what there is to argue with what I was saying. I thought I made my point quite clear... there are lots of things that OSX has that aren't that special, even though Mac folk like to claim they are genius. I mean seriously, desktop widget-type-things have been out there since Active Desktop for windows (and they were in HTML!) and then there was stuff like samurize and konfabulator (now on Mac and PC) and Apple has decided to jump on the bandwagon and add their own widgets, but after having checked it out, I really don't like it because it takes over your whole desktop with the black backdrop there. Widgets should float on your desktop without running a whole screen ordeal. Oh well, I guess some people are just in denial about their operating systems and have never gotten out from under a rock and checked out the software and hardware out there, or maybe I'm just perfectly happy with my inferior operating systems...

Your machine won't take DIMMs in that size.  The largest size it will take is 256MB (which is why the limit on it is 1GB = 4x256MB).

586109701[/snapback]

Oh!!! ok ill just buy another 256 then. Thanks. but so far I love my mac. :)

woot woot!

next a G5 !!! :woot:

Oh!!! ok ill just buy another 256 then. Thanks. but so far I love my mac. :)

woot woot!

next a G5 !!!  :woot:

586109817[/snapback]

Tons of memory is always a good thing! I say pack in as much as you possibly can! Glad you like your Mac.

Changing some jumpers is "crazy stuff"?  That's a fairly standard way of doing things on older machines.

586081650[/snapback]

Thing is it doesn't say were to put the jumpers roadwarrior. I have a 400mhz machine right now. I want to pump it up to 450 mhz atleast. were should I put the jumpers. for that? Let me know so I can do it tonight. I didn't really understand that article! Sorry I guess im not good at that.

Thing is it doesn't say were to put the jumpers roadwarrior. I have a 400mhz machine right now. I want to pump it up to 450 mhz atleast. were should I put the jumpers. for that? Let me know so I can do it tonight. I didn't really understand that article! Sorry I guess im not good at that.

586109835[/snapback]

Dude, that article couldn't be any clearer. I'll quote the relevant part here:

Next, you need to change the upper four jumpers. If you wish to set your processor to 350 MHz, insert a jumper on the uppermost set. If you wish to bump your processor to 400 MHz, insert one on the first and third jumper sets. If you wish to over clock to 450 MHz, insert a jumper on the fourth (farthest from you) set. And to try the 500 MHz speed, insert a jumper on the third set of pins.

  CPU Speeds Listed Assume 100 MHz (default) Bus Speed

    (S = Jumper present or "Set", " " = no jumper)

            Multiple     | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            3x   300 MHz |   | S | S | S |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            3.5x 350 MHz |   |   |   | S |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            4x   400 MHz |   | S |   | S |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            4.5x 450 MHz | S |   |   |   |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            5x   500 MHz |   | S |   |   |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!