I Switched to from Windows to OSX


Recommended Posts

Well I tried overclocking but it isn't working. Were do I put the pins for 450 mhz? and were do I put the pins for 500mhz? help dude I dont get the article im that dumb :(

586086879[/snapback]

Guy just put the machine back together and use it. You can research on the internet and then tear it apart when you have a game plan.

The point of this matchine is to play with. Thats what I am doing playing with it. May it be overclocking/upgrading or just playing with the OS :)

Thats the only reason I got this system. I got really tired of windows and want something new. Playing with the system in and out helps me learn more about it. thats how I learn about pcs.

Well I had a...

Amd Athlon 1900+

768 PC2100 Ram

80 GB HD

Windows XP Pro SP2

Will now have

G3 400mhz

256 Ram

10 GB HD

Great, now you can enjoy a much slower pc with no games to play on.

Congratulations! No seriously, why an old G3 400 mhz? And why not keep your x86 pc besides it? :wacko: Was it a literary switch?

Not on a 400 Mhz G3 it won't.

At least his performance will be way better than

PearPC.

I still have it. Sold it to my mom. She just wants it to surf the net. I dont play games I just use it to design and surft the net. And I wanted to do the complete switch because I am tired of windows. There is nothing I can't do in the Mac I can't do in windows.

Before trying to overclock or upgrade the processor, perhaps you should consider some of the basic steps to improve performance such as maxing out the RAM (using the correct type for your specific model instead of something which "might work".)

If you think you already have, check your System Profiler to make sure the G3 is actually registering, and therefore utilizing, the amount you believe is in there.

Another good idea which will definitely increase the responsiveness and stability of your G3 would be to add a Mac ATA-133 card like this one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...N82E16816123110.

BTW, from what were you running the "clean install" that resulted in the weird password prompt?

(or how do _you_ define "clean install"? What was the process, and why didn't you just install a fresh OS on the new drive?)

The point of this matchine is to play with. Thats what I am doing playing with it. May it be overclocking/upgrading or just playing with the OS :)

Thats the only reason I got this system. I got really tired of windows and want something new. Playing with the system in and out helps me learn more about it. thats how I learn about pcs.

586086969[/snapback]

Sorry, your frequent and urgent posts led me to believe that you were in dire straights. Have fun playing with it.

How about this guys?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...item=5783329258

or

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...5783548197&rd=1

also found some ram. Will this ram work...

1 -- http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...5784348358&rd=1

2 -- http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...5784296960&rd=1

will that sucker work on my G3? Black & White? If so please advise so I can buy it now :)

Thanks!

Edited by zerolimit

SHOWS that its compatible. only diff. is the pc133. intstead of pc100. It says on the ebay link that its compatible for my G3? Anyone have any feedback on this ram? Would really help me alot. Also on the cpu. Thanks!

Installing the ram is easy! I've build most of the pcs at home so thats easy!

SHOWS that its compatible. only diff. is the pc133. intstead of pc100. It says on the ebay link that its compatible for my G3? Anyone have any feedback on this ram? Would really help me alot. Also on the cpu. Thanks!

Installing the ram is easy! I've build most of the pcs at home so thats easy!

586108016[/snapback]

Neither of those CPU's will work in your machine. The later model G4's have a different type of socket than your G3 does. The only G4's that will work in your system are the upgrade cards that I gave you links for the other day. The second piece of RAM you linked to would definitely work, since it was pulled from the same type of system that you have. The first could go either way.

DAM!! I didn't want to spend $200+ for a cpu. $100 ya but $200+ I  was looking into 100$ maybe but im gona buy the second ram hopefully it work =) if anyone knows for sure please advise thanks!

586108324[/snapback]

The RAM will do nearly as much for you as the CPU upgrade would, honestly. I have my Blue & White maxed out (the most it will hold is 1GB), and while it only has a 600Mhz G4, it is far faster than my 800Mhz G3 iBook which only has 384MB of RAM, even on non-Altivec apps.

WTF hahaha,

Expose

CoreImage

Widgets

Spotlight

Drag & Drop installs

No Viruses/Spyware/Malware

Unix Base

All these things & 300+ other features just don't come into it at all I suppose??:laugh::

586044037[/snapback]

Expose - I have alt tab on my windows box and multiple desktops on my linux box.

CoreImage - Ok. I got a geforce 6800 gt, OC. Thats terrific.

Widgets - www.konfabulator.com (oh and it doesnt take over your whole desktop)

Spotlight - this is actually pretty good. I use it at work on my mac box frequently.

Drag & Drop installs - for those of you that aren't content to hit next a few times.

No Viruses/Spyware/Malware - Wahahahahah!!! So funny!

Unix Base - So is linux... your point?

I run my widgets on my windows xp box and i run full blown fedora core on another box... and both machines together cost less than a mac. Also, I'm sorry, but there are viruses out there, but you can live in your fantasy land... the fact that they arent as wide spread as windows viruses doesnt mean anything.

Biased? No. I do use a Mac at work. Do I enjoy it? Not really. I have to support the machines every day. I hate things about them like the fact that the interface is really flashy and in your face, I can't just press ctrl + c (makes things confusing when going between windows and linux, then to a mac... no, I gotta press Apple + c), and the whole system feels sluggish to me... but maybe thats because I'm on an older g4 tower here. I guess if I really want to indulge in the whole "Mac Experience" as you folks like to call it, I might need a G5 tower, but for the cost of one of those I could get like 2 full blown IBM Servers (yes, I'm exaggerating) and use them as a rendering hive in 3d studio max. Oh, btw, I do lots of graphic design work, and guess what I prefer to do it on.....

It just drives me nuts when someone makes insane claims about Macs... they are not really superior systems, they are just there for a cult of mac users who prefer using one button mice. If you like them, fine, but dont go making wild accusations about the capabilities of these machines because it is just rediculous.

edit...

and to the OP. Congrats on the switch. Seriously. Some people can't go from one to the other... they just can't. They get too set in their ways to want to switch. I think that if you like the interface, you will like the mac. I would suggest getting yourself a nice logitech mouse though and perhaps if you like the system enough then step up to a better machine. I have OS9 and OSX here at work and OSX is worlds better than OS9... in fact, I dont even turn my OS9 box on anymore. I hope you do enjoy it. Oh, and I use a mac keyboard on my PC.:pp

Expose - I have alt tab on my windows box and multiple desktops on my linux box.

CoreImage - Ok.  I got a geforce 6800 gt, OC.  Thats terrific.

Widgets - www.konfabulator.com (oh and it doesnt take over your whole desktop)

Spotlight - this is actually pretty good.  I use it at work on my mac box frequently.

Drag & Drop installs - for those of you that aren't content to hit next a few times.

No Viruses/Spyware/Malware - Wahahahahah!!!  So funny!

Unix Base - So is linux... your point?

I won't even go into how silly some of your comparisons are. Most of them show that you have almost no experience at all with OS X, despite your claims that you do.

Also, I'm sorry, but there are viruses out there, but you can live in your fantasy land... the fact that they arent as wide spread as windows viruses doesnt mean anything.

Oh yeah smart guy? Show me ONE virus that affects OS X. Just one. Can you? Didn't think so.

I can't just press ctrl + c (makes things confusing when going between windows and linux, then to a mac... no, I gotta press Apple + c),

Well, since the Mac had that shortcut before Windows or Linux existed, I'd say that those were the ones that got it wrong (they had to, since non-Apple computers don't have an Apple key).

and the whole system feels sluggish to me... but maybe thats because I'm on an older g4 tower here.  I guess if I really want to indulge in the whole "Mac Experience" as you folks like to call it, I might need a G5 tower,

Look at the specs of my machines. Neither of them seem "sluggish" to me.

It just drives me nuts when someone makes insane claims about Macs... they are not really superior systems, they are just there for a cult of mac users who prefer using one button mice.  If you like them, fine, but dont go making wild accusations about the capabilities of these machines because it is just rediculous.

586108817[/snapback]

The person you quoted mad no "insane claims" about the Mac. They simply pointed out some of the reasons that someone might want to switch. Oh, and I (along with most others here) use a multi-button mouse with my Macs. Not that we have to, since the interface is designed for single button use, but it makes some shortcuts easier to get to.

It seems that YOU are the one making "wild accusations", not the person you quoted.

well back to the subject. I bought the ones you said would work. 2 128 so its a total of 512 ram. Should that make it fast enought to do some things here and there? or should I get 1 more?

586109091[/snapback]

That should be fine. My iBook only has 384MB and I use it daily. If you have the money to spare, then yeah, get more, but remember you only have 4 slots in there.

I would need to find one that is 512 Ram. Anyone know were I can get that? cheap?

586109555[/snapback]

Your machine won't take DIMMs in that size. The largest size it will take is 256MB (which is why the limit on it is 1GB = 4x256MB).

I won't even go into how silly some of your comparisons are.  Most of them show that you have almost no experience at all with OS X, despite your claims that you do.

My point that I was trying to illustrate is that the Mac doesnt have any super features or things that can't be done on a PC. Your failure to realize this bewilders me as even a 2 year old can grasp this concept... a yellow apple and a red apple differ in appearance, yet, both are apples, and both are just as good. If you prefer red apples to green apples, that is your thing.

Oh yeah smart guy?  Show me ONE virus that affects OS X.  Just one.  Can you?  Didn't think so.

Do a little research, I did. I found ONE virus. There will be others as soon as people start feeling malicious enough. Why else would companies make anti-virus software? For you. Smart Guy. Now, I feel it important to note that although there is a lack of viruses available for the Mac, there is also a lack of lots of things. There is spyware to (Little Snitch) and I'm sure there is Adware to, as the Mac OS is not some superior operating system... why else would Apple release security patches?

Well, since the Mac had that shortcut before Windows or Linux existed, I'd say that those were the ones that got it wrong (they had to, since non-Apple computers don't have an Apple key).

I'll give you that. I do recall using Mac computers when I was in 3rd grade and having to use the apple key, now that I think about it. That particular reference was mostly a matter of preference on my part, and not really a fault of Apple... only a poor example of the annoying lack of cross compatability in many aspects of the Mac vs. the PC.

Look at the specs of my machines.  Neither of them seem "sluggish" to me. 

The person you quoted mad no "insane claims" about the Mac.  They simply pointed out some of the reasons that someone might want to switch.  Oh, and I (along with most others here) use a multi-button mouse with my Macs.  Not that we have to, since the interface is designed for single button use, but it makes some shortcuts easier to get to.

The feel that I got from the post I quoted was that those were all great features that would make the Mac so much better than everything out there, especially when the only really good thing in the list was Spotlight, which I feel is even better than the google desktop search for PC. Multi button mice should just be something that is included with the system at this point. It is silly, especially when working in photoshop and illustrator. It's so nice to have a right click for changing certain properties and using a secondary color. I agree that the design of the interface for the Mac is good with one button mice, but I think that most applications out there benifit greatly from 2 or more button mice.

It seems that YOU are the one making "wild accusations", not the person you quoted.

Your lack of being able to tell me what specifically was wrong with my first list of statements just goes to show how you really can't argue with what I said... things like expose and drag and drop installs are nice, but not a reason to switch to the Mac. I don't see what there is to argue with what I was saying. I thought I made my point quite clear... there are lots of things that OSX has that aren't that special, even though Mac folk like to claim they are genius. I mean seriously, desktop widget-type-things have been out there since Active Desktop for windows (and they were in HTML!) and then there was stuff like samurize and konfabulator (now on Mac and PC) and Apple has decided to jump on the bandwagon and add their own widgets, but after having checked it out, I really don't like it because it takes over your whole desktop with the black backdrop there. Widgets should float on your desktop without running a whole screen ordeal. Oh well, I guess some people are just in denial about their operating systems and have never gotten out from under a rock and checked out the software and hardware out there, or maybe I'm just perfectly happy with my inferior operating systems...

Your machine won't take DIMMs in that size.  The largest size it will take is 256MB (which is why the limit on it is 1GB = 4x256MB).

586109701[/snapback]

Oh!!! ok ill just buy another 256 then. Thanks. but so far I love my mac. :)

woot woot!

next a G5 !!! :woot:

Oh!!! ok ill just buy another 256 then. Thanks. but so far I love my mac. :)

woot woot!

next a G5 !!!  :woot:

586109817[/snapback]

Tons of memory is always a good thing! I say pack in as much as you possibly can! Glad you like your Mac.

Changing some jumpers is "crazy stuff"?  That's a fairly standard way of doing things on older machines.

586081650[/snapback]

Thing is it doesn't say were to put the jumpers roadwarrior. I have a 400mhz machine right now. I want to pump it up to 450 mhz atleast. were should I put the jumpers. for that? Let me know so I can do it tonight. I didn't really understand that article! Sorry I guess im not good at that.

Thing is it doesn't say were to put the jumpers roadwarrior. I have a 400mhz machine right now. I want to pump it up to 450 mhz atleast. were should I put the jumpers. for that? Let me know so I can do it tonight. I didn't really understand that article! Sorry I guess im not good at that.

586109835[/snapback]

Dude, that article couldn't be any clearer. I'll quote the relevant part here:

Next, you need to change the upper four jumpers. If you wish to set your processor to 350 MHz, insert a jumper on the uppermost set. If you wish to bump your processor to 400 MHz, insert one on the first and third jumper sets. If you wish to over clock to 450 MHz, insert a jumper on the fourth (farthest from you) set. And to try the 500 MHz speed, insert a jumper on the third set of pins.

  CPU Speeds Listed Assume 100 MHz (default) Bus Speed

    (S = Jumper present or "Set", " " = no jumper)

            Multiple     | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            3x   300 MHz |   | S | S | S |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            3.5x 350 MHz |   |   |   | S |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            4x   400 MHz |   | S |   | S |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            4.5x 450 MHz | S |   |   |   |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+
            5x   500 MHz |   | S |   |   |
            -------------+---+---+---+---+

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!