[NHL] Official Buyout & Signings Thread


Recommended Posts

I'm going to need to buy one of those magazines with all the new rosters at the beginning of the season.  This is insane.  Huge names are moving all over the place.

586316067[/snapback]

Seriously...The Capitals were my bastion of sanity, as the roster was pretty much set from season to season. So much for that! :p

Like the big market teams were responsible under the old CBA.

586315572[/snapback]

You obviously do not understand the situation.

Big-market teams were not ruining the sport under the old CBA... they were advancing it. Colorado, Detroit, Dallas, New York... all of these teams have high payrolls, yet all of them all lure in fans. Ever wonder why that is? Smaller market teams didn't have the balls to take some risks (other than in drafting) and sign some explosive free agents.

Now, when there is supposed to be "cost certainty", small-market teams have SUDDENLY found money and are SUDDENLY making the aforementioned "big moves"... only now they're doing it at the absolute worst time possible. They're giving free agents who are good players, yet not top-tier, GIANT contracts, in terms of the new CBA. You DO know that there is a $39 million cap, correct?

Bearded Kirklander: No, it won't. It will make them screwed in terms of what they can give to other players, thus ruining their season before it even begins. These small market teams are also ruining it for everyone else by jacking up the "bar" of what free agents are going to cost -- especially since none of the players signed have even been the really big names yet.

Bearded Kirklander: No, it won't. It will make them screwed in terms of what they can give to other players, thus ruining their season before it even begins. These small market teams are also ruining it for everyone else by jacking up the "bar" of what free agents are going to cost -- especially since none of the players signed have even been the really big names yet.

I don't understand that. I must be missing something.

All the teams have to have the same minimum cap and maximum cap right? They want it to be about Parity, right? Plus, there is a max salary per player that they can pay, right?

So each team should be able to afford great players now, shouldn't they?

Yes, all teams have the same minimum and maxiumum cap. But it is a HARD cap... there is no flexibility at all. Thus, if they blow too much money on free agents, they're screwing themselves when it comes time to fill up the rest of their roster -- so basically they're playing with 5 players and a revolving cast of a bunch of minor leaguers (for example).

And, yes, there is a maximum salary (roughly $7 million)... but my point is, these small market teams are giving too much to merely "good" players. A great player doesn't even need to be making $7 million -- $4 million would be a good price for a top-tier free agent, and these clubs are just throwing money around like it's nothing. You cannot do that anymore. Maybe in the old CBA, but not this one. They're only raising the price that people are going to want around the league and screwing the entire system.

Yes, all teams have the same minimum and maxiumum cap. But it is a HARD cap... there is no flexibility at all. Thus, if they blow too much money on free agents, they're screwing themselves when it comes time to fill up the rest of their roster -- so basically they're playing with 5 players and a revolving cast of a bunch of minor leaguers (for example).

I guess I don't understand how that is a problem? All the teams are in the same circumstance, which is a good thing, right?

And, yes, there is a maximum salary (roughly $7 million)... but my point is, these small market teams are giving too much to merely "good" players. A great player doesn't even need to be making $7 million -- $4 million would be a good price for a top-tier free agent, and these clubs are just throwing money around like it's nothing. You cannot do that anymore. Maybe in the old CBA, but not this one. They're only raising the price that people are going to want around the league and screwing the entire system.

Nobody is forcing those teams to over pay. I guess I still can't understand your point. I don't see how your logic gets from point A to point B. It just doesn't make sense to me.

Guess I'm just not on your level. :)

Big-market teams were not ruining the sport under the old CBA... they were advancing it. Colorado, Detroit, Dallas, New York... all of these teams have high payrolls, yet all of them all lure in fans. Ever wonder why that is? Smaller market teams didn't have the balls to take some risks (other than in drafting) and sign some explosive free agents.

586316112[/snapback]

Well, I'd specifically say that NJ, under the old CBA, was perennially the best at getting value for money. Year after year of competitive teams with a few Stanley Cups thrown in there. They never squandered draft pics and they always had a core of players in their mid-to-late 20s. The veterans they had were effective and they seemed pretty good at developing talent.

Essentially they did everything my Leafs didn't do and vice versa. The Leafs tried to compensate with a higher payroll but it never worked.

Since there's a salary cap now, the lower market teams can finally afford the big name players.? This will balance out the playing field.? The NHL is turning into the NFL.

I hope all the contracts in the NHL are fully guaranteed though. That is one thing about the NFL that I think sucks:(:(

I guess I do like the idea of a salary cap in terms of national sports organizations. With taxpayer dollars going to fund stadiums and the like, it is nice to know that small market teams will be on equal footing in many ways with large market teams. There is public money and resources involved in these sports, and I think parity may end up resulting in a public benefit.

Bearded Kirklander: because of the new cap and the 24% roll-back on salaries, your 2nd tier player should be worth anywhere between 1-3million max. which is the basis to the entire CBA agreement, to cut prices and reduce teams that spend tonnes of money and hog up the entire talent pool. Now that all teams have the same spending restrictions on payroll you're seeing 5-6 teams bidding against eachother for a single 2nd tier players. This is driving up the overall value of all players causing teams to max out their payroll ebfore even building a decent team. Also what it is doing is making the cap unrealistic since you're seeing 2nd tier players having their prices at the 4-5million range. A salary fit for many top tier players!! Now what are the top tier players going to get paid? Also u might see a lot of less talented guys being replaced by farm team players.

Bearded Kirklander: because of the new cap and the 24% roll-back on salaries, your 2nd tier player should be worth anywhere between 1-3million max. which is the basis to the entire CBA agreement, to cut prices and reduce teams that spend tonnes of money and hog up the entire talent pool. Now that all teams have the same spending restrictions on payroll you're seeing 5-6 teams bidding against eachother for a single 2nd tier players. This is driving up the overall value of all players causing teams to max out their payroll ebfore even building a decent team. Also what it is doing is making the cap unrealistic since you're seeing 2nd tier players having their prices at the 4-5million range. A salary fit for many top tier players!! Now what are the top tier players going to get paid? Also u might see a lot of less talented guys being replaced by farm team players.

586316892[/snapback]

Thank you, that's exactly what I mean.

And, yes, it is a good thing that the playing field is even between the teams now. But my point is that these teams are paying far too much money for players that are not of an amazing quality. Sure, they're good, but they are not franchise players. They do not deserve to be getting that kind of money. It is a good thing that teams are on an even playing field...

...it is a bad thing in how these small market teams are giving players silly amounts of money -- they're increasing the market cost for all players, screwing everyone over in the process -- players, teams, everyone. They're ruining the "cost certainty" that the game was supposed to have under the new CBA. Now if top-tier players see this and think they deserve the top $7 million, no one's going to sign them. And players are simply going to demand so much money things are going to get out of hand, when you have second-tier players making $4 million... in the new CBA, that should be top-tier price. But it's not going to be because these small-market teams are ruining the marketplace.

thats the problem, they're not using it wisely, spending absurd amounts for 2nd tier players when they fough so hard to have lower salaries. It just yields the entire system useless.

if you think about it, if the GMs worked together they could be getting players like Aucoin, Holik and Foote which got paid 4-4.5m each per season for much less, closer to the 2-3m range but their insane bidding wars are driving up the avg cost of all players.... if a player like Naslund earned 5.25m last year, this year with the 24% roll-back teams should be offering him roughly 4.23m. My bet is that naslun will sign for 6m, earning more than he did before the CBA, because 2nd tier players are getting 4.5m

Edited by bayrider
thats the problem, they're not using it wisely, spending absurd amounts for 2nd tier players when they fough so hard to have lower salaries. It just yields the entire system useless.

I don't see how it would render it useless.

If they waste money on players that suck, the team will suck, right? Sucky teams usually have lower attendance. Lower TV ratings. Lower revenues. They may realize they overpaid and manage money better.

If they pay that high money for a couple of awesome players and the players perform and the team wins games, that's a good thing. If the team doesn't win a ton of games but the players are major fan draws, then maybe attendance will be good, TV ratings will be good and they will do just fine anyway.

Look at the LA Lakers. They had Shaq and Kobe and like - who else? Two huge salaries and they won 3 championships.

Look at the Spurs and Detroit. They spread their money around to all the players and they win championships.

Look at Minnesota. They forked all that cash on Garnett - no progress into the playoffs.

Baseball teams over-pay and sometimes they rock and sometimes they suck. Boston has a HUGE payroll and they won the world series. The Marlins had a sorta lower payroll and they won. The Oakland A's have a low payroll and they won. New York Yankees have a HUGE payroll and this year they kinda suck.

It doesn't seem right to generalize and condemn things just because some players get good contracts. Lots of things can happen.

I think you guys are spazzin' out over not much. :)

But the salary cap will protect them from making totally horrible moves endangering the profitability of the franchise, right?

586315589[/snapback]

i dont think u understand. Do u realize how many unsigned players there are in the NHL as of right now?

look:

Western Conference

Eastern Conference

now, try to fit all those big names (besides the ones u hear about floating around) in a 39m cap, with the average price of 2nd tier players rising beyond that of many 1st tier players from before the CBA... whats the point? a lot of players r gonna get cut, replaced, some teams r gonna have 1 or 2 top players with 2nd, 3rd, 4th, D and G line players from the minors or the beer league.

I do realize its the mistake of the teams, but it's going to be a huge problem in the NHL in the future

Bearded Kirklander, I have to agree with bayrider, I don't think you understand the logistics and economics of the situation. It's not us "spazzing out", it's economic principals. Your logic and reasoning simply doesn't make sense.

So, because they sign a player for too much money means that there will be no rammifications other than that they will "manage money better"? How on Earth can they do that when they've already mismanaged their money and screwed the entire league over? By them paying this amount of money to second-tier players, they're (willingly or unwillingly) setting the new industry standard, or the "bar", if you will. When other players see these guys -- who had worse seasons than them, and are not franchise players -- making that kind of money, don't you think their agents are going to ask for unreasonable amounts?

Your comparisons to Shaq and Kobe are utterly asinine. This is not the same situation at all. When Shaq and Kobe were together it wasn't a hard cap (and it still isn't) in the NBA. There are luxury taxes for that, and if you go over the payroll you simply pay the luxury tax. This isn't a "luxury" (pardon the pun :p) that NHL teams have. And to say that Kobe and Shaq were the only two on the Lakers is silly. Not only that, but you're comparing second-tier (how many times are we going to have to go over this part) to Kobe and Shaq, two of the best players in the NBA!

You can't keep using your NBA arguments for the NHL. It isn't the same, and you simply do not understand the economics of the situation, from the looks of your posts. I mean, you can't honestly be arguing about this situation when you then use the MLB -- a league that doesn't even HAVE a salary cap -- to bolster your argument. Your comparisons are comparisons to the old CBA, not the new one.

Teams can't have "smart management" when these smaller-market teams keep screwing over everyone else. There is no "cost certainty" with these signings, and the "bar" is raised, as I've been trying to explain to you.

me niether... just carrying on a conversation, never attacked or got hostile.

anyways, some news for today:

Modano is not yet a Star, Boston pushed a last minute deal and Modano is still considering what team to sign to.

Kariya is strongly rumored to go to the Sharks

Martin Skoula signed with Dallas

Pittsburgh is making a big push for Niedermayer, Vancouver and Calgary are involved as well (but i dont see Calgary making a big push since they still have Iginla to sign)

Berdusco: you and I might be excited about this one, Habs and Kovalev are pretty close to wrapping things up. I personally would love to see Kovalev-Koivu-Zednik tear it up in the regular season like tehy did in the Boston playoff series.

Naslund: 3yrs $18mil with vancouver. So the bar has been set, it seems like 1st tier players are getting 6

Edited by bayrider

Zhitnik signed with islanders

"As reported on Sportstalk 980 in Vancouver, Markus Naslund would've agreed on a new deal with the Canucks. Financial terms were not released as of yet. A news conference is apparently scheduled either tomorrow or for Thursday..."

source

Probably not Forsberg, can't say much about Satan right now, i doubt Gainey will sign both Kovalev and Satan since we have a gap to fill on D. And i have a delicious little rumor that before the trade deadline in the 2003-04 season we almost had a deal with Tampa for Lecavalier, we would given up Koivu and Hainsey, but Tampa wanted Koivu and Komisarek instead. That offer is going to be pushed sometime late this year with Tampa getting Hainsey + Koivu so Tampa can free up some cap space while we keep ours low by only signing Kovalev OR Satan and a good D-man

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Indeed - drives me mad - usually because Refresh is hidden in the full menu.
    • Firefox has had rounded corners for many years. I take it you're not a fan of modern browsers?
    • The problem is in the fundamentals of how businesses are allowed to operate and the change should happen in the basics and certain consumer friendly and moral practices should be enforced by law. This would fix so many things, not just this ages old default browser issue which is a tiny drop in the backut that includes a flood of privacy and other issues.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!