Recommended Posts

I've been trying that for 4 hours.  I see the extracting taking place, but nothing else happens.  I guess my computer just don't want it.  :cry:

586286580[/snapback]

where does it say its extracting to

for me it was a seemingly random location: F:\thtf7nu868hr687hr658n5ro :s

(that wasnt exactly it but it was the same drive and had a random folder name :p )

where does it say its extracting to

for me it was a seemingly random location: F:\thtf7nu868hr687hr658n5ro :s

(that wasnt exactly it but it was the same drive and had a random folder name :p )

586286667[/snapback]

That's all it does.

Everyone is talking about this acid2test. What is the proper image actually suppose to look like ?

586286730[/snapback]

Its meant to look like this:

http://www.webstandards.org/act/acid2/reference.html

This is the test if you want to try it yourself:

http://www.webstandards.org/act/acid2/test.html#top

Its meant to look like this:

http://www.webstandards.org/act/acid2/reference.html

This is the test if you want to try it yourself:

http://www.webstandards.org/act/acid2/test.html#top

586286747[/snapback]

Yes but not even Firefox is complete like that so .... :rofl:

acid2 test is kind of ridiculous since no mainstream browsers currently render it correctly.

586286764[/snapback]

I recall reading Safari being the first browser to pass Acid. And I just tried it did not render that image correctly in Acid2.

I have one doubt. does UI effects come under standards ? like decorating widgets like drop down list, buttons etc ? Since safari uses proprietary stuff, many sites look weird with that and hence isn't it odd that it is not included as part of the test ?

Off the top of my head...check out http://virtualearth.msn.com/ in IE, FF & Safari. Both IE & FF will render it the way it is supposed to look whereas Safari breaks it since the "Local Search" button is a Mac only look & feel and won't blend nicely with rest of the page. :unsure:

IE 7 isn't bad. I realize this is beta 1. My top line (MSN Search, The addy bar and foward and back buttons can't be moved. On my old IE I had menu, links, addy bar and foward and back on the same line. It still relies heavily on ActiveX which will probably keep me with Firefox. ActiveX is a nice feature, but at the same time is the worst feature. ActiveX is the reason that the previous IE releases became so insecure. IE needs ActiveX for one legit reason, Windows Update. Every other non-IE browser on the planet survives without ActiveX. IE can too. Make Windows Update a seperate process from the browser and IE will be as secure as everyother browser. Plus, without ActiveX, IE is much faster. Overall grade: C, lose ActiveX and that grade will be an A-.

What the heck do you need a close button for on the tabs?  click it with your middle mouse button and it closes.  some people are either too stupid or too lazy to figure them simplest things out.

586286924[/snapback]

My "x" button wouldn't close my tabs, so I went to the registry and just turned it off.

What the heck do you need a close button for on the tabs?  click it with your middle mouse button and it closes.  some people are either too stupid or too lazy to figure them simplest things out.

586286924[/snapback]

Normally, I use Maxthon as my main browser here at work. It handles tabs the best in my opinion. Double click the bar and it creates a new tab, double click the tab and it closes. I can get used to the middle click, but I'd rather double click to close.

Why is it that everytime M$ gets some new software out there is people complaining and on top they are the one that are not suppose to have the release that does.

Tell M$ instead of us and i think that there would be more chance that your complaints gets heard and your suggested improvements introduced in the next release instead of telling people that dont care.

586285788[/snapback]

I don't like IE7, but I couldn't live without Windows 2000/XP, Office 2003, a lot of MS games and my list of products they make, that I love could go on. For those of us who are actually beta testers (myself included) I've submitted my complaints within half an hour of using the app, I just plain don't like it, the UI is totally conter productive IMO, and if it stays this way, I'll stick with FF. And this forum is for discussion of such matters, that's why people talk about it here, to share ideas and opinions.

I think IE7 looks fine, its alot more interesting than firefox, don't get me wrong i used ff all the time but i think microsoft finally caought up.

don't hate it just because you want to hate microsoft. If microsoft made FF you'd hate it.

586285829[/snapback]

see above

It just seems much faster, and to me, firefox was always to "chunky" IE is nice and "thin" and just what i need....

I dont really know, its just my personal opinion!

586285830[/snapback]

Either something is wrong with your eyes, or you very confused, with cute menu installed, firefox takes up a total of one 24px (with no tabs open) task bar on both my systems, which gives me a ton of browsing space (I don't like full screen so don't say it). But with IE7, the smallest i could get was two 24px and one 16px toolbar, that's 40px lost screen spaces, and when your viewing forums etc, that sucks.

I could go on with more people's comments, but we'd be here forever

Look, some people just don't like this. I personally am very unimpressed, i find it a completely counter productive UI, it should be slim, unobtrusive, just enough to get the job done, and no need for all that empty space.

As far as speed, i don't get how everyone finds it so much faster, i find it takes much longer to load images than FF does. Anyway, enough of it, i just feel UI wise it's a step back from IE6 minus the tabs (i wish i could move them though). I just really don't see what the big deal is, just because someone makes a negative comment about the product everyone jumps all over us.

Here's how I feel the browser should look (well how I think it should), as out of the way as possible, I want to see the webpage, not 4 inches of toolbars.

post-10697-1122571080_thumb.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I agree when are you going to read this (really poor BTW) article? Here is a better article so you actually know what is going on and answers questions you had in other comments --> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/05/speed-boosting-low-latency-profile-is-one-of-the-improvements-coming-to-windows-11/ It is unclear if one will be able to disable the new profile at this point but I am not seeing any reason why one would.
    • I disagree; they come off very "bitchy" and "whiny". Make a great product and combine that with a great price (free) and people will come over to your side. Or build it and they will come as they say. Constantly trying to get attention by complaining all the time, will turn people off to your product.
    • It use to be a nightmare, with LibreOffice supporting a newer draft ODF standard by default, and Microsoft Office supporting the older non-draft standard. Now that they both support the same version of ODF, they should be interoperable.
    • Brave Browser 1.91.171 by Razvan Serea Brave Browser is a lightning-fast, secure web browser that stands out from the competition with its focus on privacy, security, and speed. With features like HTTPS Everywhere and built-in tracker blocking, Brave keeps your online activities safe from prying eyes. Brave is one of the safest browsers on the market today. It blocks third-party data storage. It protects from browser fingerprinting. And it does all this by default. Speed - Brave is built on Chromium, the same technology that powers Google Chrome, and is optimized for speed, providing a fast and responsive browsing experience. Brave Browser also features Brave Rewards, a system that rewards users with Basic Attention Tokens (BAT) for viewing opt-in ads. This innovative system provides an alternative revenue model for content creators and a way to support the Brave community. SlimBrave Neo takes all the good things about Brave and makes them even better by keeping everything clean, light, and privacy-focused. It removes the extra clutter, turns off features you might not need, and cuts down on anything that could slow you down or collect unnecessary data. Because it relies on simple settings and policies instead of modifying the browser itself, you still get full Brave compatibility—just in a smoother, lighter, and more privacy-friendly package. Brave Browser 1.91.171 changelog: General Fixed Cardano not being disabled on upgrade to Brave Origin. Upgraded Chromium to 149.0.7827.103. Origin Removed “Survey Panelist” setting from brave://settings/privacy. Fixed P3A and usage ping under brave://settings/privacy being displayed on first launch on Linux. Upgraded Chromium to 149.0.7827.103. Download: Brave Browser 64-bit | 1.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Brave Browser 32-bit View: Brave Homepage | Offline Installers | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hi. As the title suggests, I can't access the forum on my phone. I'm using Edge on Android and when I try to navigate to the forum I get a "we value your privacy" popup and none of the buttons are clickable. It effectively stonewalls me from reading any forum content.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      190
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!