Recommended Posts

I've been trying that for 4 hours.  I see the extracting taking place, but nothing else happens.  I guess my computer just don't want it.  :cry:

586286580[/snapback]

where does it say its extracting to

for me it was a seemingly random location: F:\thtf7nu868hr687hr658n5ro :s

(that wasnt exactly it but it was the same drive and had a random folder name :p )

where does it say its extracting to

for me it was a seemingly random location: F:\thtf7nu868hr687hr658n5ro :s

(that wasnt exactly it but it was the same drive and had a random folder name :p )

586286667[/snapback]

That's all it does.

Everyone is talking about this acid2test. What is the proper image actually suppose to look like ?

586286730[/snapback]

Its meant to look like this:

http://www.webstandards.org/act/acid2/reference.html

This is the test if you want to try it yourself:

http://www.webstandards.org/act/acid2/test.html#top

Its meant to look like this:

http://www.webstandards.org/act/acid2/reference.html

This is the test if you want to try it yourself:

http://www.webstandards.org/act/acid2/test.html#top

586286747[/snapback]

Yes but not even Firefox is complete like that so .... :rofl:

acid2 test is kind of ridiculous since no mainstream browsers currently render it correctly.

586286764[/snapback]

I recall reading Safari being the first browser to pass Acid. And I just tried it did not render that image correctly in Acid2.

I have one doubt. does UI effects come under standards ? like decorating widgets like drop down list, buttons etc ? Since safari uses proprietary stuff, many sites look weird with that and hence isn't it odd that it is not included as part of the test ?

Off the top of my head...check out http://virtualearth.msn.com/ in IE, FF & Safari. Both IE & FF will render it the way it is supposed to look whereas Safari breaks it since the "Local Search" button is a Mac only look & feel and won't blend nicely with rest of the page. :unsure:

IE 7 isn't bad. I realize this is beta 1. My top line (MSN Search, The addy bar and foward and back buttons can't be moved. On my old IE I had menu, links, addy bar and foward and back on the same line. It still relies heavily on ActiveX which will probably keep me with Firefox. ActiveX is a nice feature, but at the same time is the worst feature. ActiveX is the reason that the previous IE releases became so insecure. IE needs ActiveX for one legit reason, Windows Update. Every other non-IE browser on the planet survives without ActiveX. IE can too. Make Windows Update a seperate process from the browser and IE will be as secure as everyother browser. Plus, without ActiveX, IE is much faster. Overall grade: C, lose ActiveX and that grade will be an A-.

What the heck do you need a close button for on the tabs?  click it with your middle mouse button and it closes.  some people are either too stupid or too lazy to figure them simplest things out.

586286924[/snapback]

My "x" button wouldn't close my tabs, so I went to the registry and just turned it off.

What the heck do you need a close button for on the tabs?  click it with your middle mouse button and it closes.  some people are either too stupid or too lazy to figure them simplest things out.

586286924[/snapback]

Normally, I use Maxthon as my main browser here at work. It handles tabs the best in my opinion. Double click the bar and it creates a new tab, double click the tab and it closes. I can get used to the middle click, but I'd rather double click to close.

Why is it that everytime M$ gets some new software out there is people complaining and on top they are the one that are not suppose to have the release that does.

Tell M$ instead of us and i think that there would be more chance that your complaints gets heard and your suggested improvements introduced in the next release instead of telling people that dont care.

586285788[/snapback]

I don't like IE7, but I couldn't live without Windows 2000/XP, Office 2003, a lot of MS games and my list of products they make, that I love could go on. For those of us who are actually beta testers (myself included) I've submitted my complaints within half an hour of using the app, I just plain don't like it, the UI is totally conter productive IMO, and if it stays this way, I'll stick with FF. And this forum is for discussion of such matters, that's why people talk about it here, to share ideas and opinions.

I think IE7 looks fine, its alot more interesting than firefox, don't get me wrong i used ff all the time but i think microsoft finally caought up.

don't hate it just because you want to hate microsoft. If microsoft made FF you'd hate it.

586285829[/snapback]

see above

It just seems much faster, and to me, firefox was always to "chunky" IE is nice and "thin" and just what i need....

I dont really know, its just my personal opinion!

586285830[/snapback]

Either something is wrong with your eyes, or you very confused, with cute menu installed, firefox takes up a total of one 24px (with no tabs open) task bar on both my systems, which gives me a ton of browsing space (I don't like full screen so don't say it). But with IE7, the smallest i could get was two 24px and one 16px toolbar, that's 40px lost screen spaces, and when your viewing forums etc, that sucks.

I could go on with more people's comments, but we'd be here forever

Look, some people just don't like this. I personally am very unimpressed, i find it a completely counter productive UI, it should be slim, unobtrusive, just enough to get the job done, and no need for all that empty space.

As far as speed, i don't get how everyone finds it so much faster, i find it takes much longer to load images than FF does. Anyway, enough of it, i just feel UI wise it's a step back from IE6 minus the tabs (i wish i could move them though). I just really don't see what the big deal is, just because someone makes a negative comment about the product everyone jumps all over us.

Here's how I feel the browser should look (well how I think it should), as out of the way as possible, I want to see the webpage, not 4 inches of toolbars.

post-10697-1122571080_thumb.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
    • All it does is use the CPU more efficiently during boot to speed up boot times. That's it. Yawn....
    • It's not a one or the other kind of thing. Software should run efficiently, and the operating system should appropriately manage the CPU clocks. You could have the best most optimized software on earth, and it will still run faster if the CPU does a better job of boosting as needed. All this is doing is pre-boosting the CPU based on user actions, instead of waiting for the normal detection mechanism to kick in. If the OS knows it is about to need more CPU, why shouldn't it use that knowledge? It's the same idea of downshifting before passing someone, instead of just burying your foot into the peddle and waiting for the transmission to figure out what you want to do.
    • Audacity 3.7.8 by Razvan Serea Audacity is a free, open source digital audio editor and recording application. Edit your sounds using cut, copy, and paste features (with unlimited undo functionality), mix tracks, or apply effects to your recordings. The program also has a built-in amplitude-envelope editor, a customizable spectrogram mode, and a frequency-analysis window for audio-analysis applications. Built-in effects include bass boost, wah wah, and noise removal, and the program also supports VST plug-in effects. You can use Audacity to: Record live audio. Record computer playback on any Windows Vista or later machine. Convert tapes and records into digital recordings or CDs. Edit WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP2, MP3 or Ogg Vorbis sound files. AC3, M4A/M4R (AAC), WMA and other formats supported using optional libraries. Cut, copy, splice or mix sounds together. Numerous effects including change the speed or pitch of a recording. Write your own plug-in effects with Nyquist. And more! See the complete list of features. Audacity 3.7.8 changelog: #10688 Fixed an exception thrown when pasting into a newly-created track (Thanks, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!) #10870, #10884, #10775, #10629 Fixed tone generation, waveform-scale setting, SetClip Name parameter, and clip-boundary command names for scripting and macros (Thank you, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!) #11106 Fixed the loading of presets for the Distortion effect (A million thanks, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!) #10947 Fixed paste into an empty audio track not preserving the source sample rate (Thanks, Juan Gabriel Colonna (@juancolonna)!) #10776 Allowed AltGr modifier in label and clip name editing (Thanks, Davide Peressoni (@DPDmancul)!) #9938 Added options to choose where silence is truncated (start/middle/end) (Thanks, Noah Rosenfield (@nosenfield)!) #9935 Added Podcast 2.0 chapters JSON export for label tracks (Thanks, Noah Rosenfield (@nosenfield)!) #10103 Improve UI on HiDPI displays on Linux/wxGTK (Thanks, Ivan A. Melnikov (@iv-m)!) #10099 Fixed MixerBoard Mute and Solo button display (Thanks, Ivan A. Melnikov (@iv-m)!) #10681 Fixed multichannel FLAC import #10999 Fixed envelope being broken after joining clips Download: Audacity 64-bit | Standalone ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Audacity 32-bit | Standalone Download: Audacity ARM64 | Standalone View: Audacity Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!