Mighty Mouse


Recommended Posts

Let me get this straight;

It's an optical mouse, with a scroll bar that turns in all four directions and it has a right/left click button, plus 1 button on each side.

Right?

PHE4R my Scroll Ball! :D

Essentially, it seems you are correct.

But to the apple community, going from that Apple produced 1 button mouse to an Apple produced multi-button mouse is quite a culture shift, I would think.

It's pretty and all, but I would be happy if a mouse manufacturere would simply produce a multi-button mouse (wired or wireless) with the ergonomics of a Logitech MouseMan, but with the dual sensors under the fingertip section rather than the center of the mouses "belly".

I prefer a mouse to do selecting, editing and so-on in Photoshop, and I have failed to find a modern mouse with the sensors "up front" where they used to be with the "ball" mice. It is sooooo much easier to control minute mouse movements with the sensors under the fingers.

Couldn't tell from the Apple site where the sensors were located underneath.

Edit:

designmouseoptical20050802.jpg

Apparently I need to keep waiting. :huh:

Edited by Fogtripper

Once it becomes BT it will be mine, oh yes...it will be mine...

Meh, only if it was wireless. I just picked up this mouse from Microsoft: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/B0...2&s=electronics

I can't go back to wired now pinch.gif

I had that mouse, it's wayyyyy to small for adult sized hands ( at least mine ), I sold it and bought a logitech v200, a goo amount bigger and prob gets way better battery life...

You click just like a normal mouse. The hardware inside just senses what click to perform, left or right.

586316521[/snapback]

wrong...u dont press down, so technicallty u have to LIFT UP and then press down for a click. where as for a normal mouse ur finger is resting, u just press down.

and since its touch sensitive i bet itll be less accurate to presses than a normal one

I've got mine here and to put this to rest:

You put your finger on whichever side you want to press, LEFT or RIGHT, then CLICK down like current apple mice.

If you rest two fingers on both sides it defaults to a LEFT click. There fore you have to lift the LEFT finger to right click, but not visa-versa.

Has anyone actually tried this thing personally?

586322830[/snapback]

That's what I would like to know. By reading this thread you would think this thing jumps on your lap and...well, be better than sliced bread.

New technology can be cool and all, but the thing just doesn't sound appealing to me. I like a mouse button to have a click, even if it is a small one to let me know it has clicked. I like scroll wheels (at least the one on my Logitech) that move, rather than sliding my finger over top of a surface or tiny ball. I like my mouse to conform to my hand and not feel like a bar of soap.

Like I mentioned above, the only thing that would make me migrate to a different mouse is if a manufacturer created one with the features of a MouseMan, but had the sensors moved forward to the fingertip section.

Is the new Mac Mouse better than the bar'o soap or the "hockey puck"? Has to be. Is it more comfortable to use than what is already out there? I'll wait till we get some impartial reviews of users in here. :yes:

I've got mine here and to put this to rest:

You put your finger on whichever side you want to press, LEFT or RIGHT, then CLICK down like current apple mice.

If you rest two fingers on both sides it defaults to a LEFT click. There fore you have to lift the LEFT finger to right click, but not visa-versa.

586324459[/snapback]

So the whole body clicks down as the stock mouse does?

you idiots it just senses which side of the mouse button has been clicked. this is to keep the style of a one button mouse, but the ability to just use it exactly like a two button mouse. you dont have to lift your fingers up but merely it detects which side you have pressed down. before you click it detects nothing, because no pressure has been used to click.

you idiots it just senses which side of the mouse button has been clicked. this is to keep the style of a one button mouse, but the ability to just use it exactly like a two button mouse. you dont have to lift your fingers up but merely it detects which side you have pressed down. before you click it detects nothing, because no pressure has been used to click.

586324975[/snapback]

Decaff is your friend. :sleep:

you idiots it just senses which side of the mouse button has been clicked. this is to keep the style of a one button mouse, but the ability to just use it exactly like a two button mouse. you dont have to lift your fingers up but merely it detects which side you have pressed down. before you click it detects nothing, because no pressure has been used to click.

586324975[/snapback]

That's not true. You should read the posts above you.

you idiots it just senses which side of the mouse button has been clicked. this is to keep the style of a one button mouse, but the ability to just use it exactly like a two button mouse. you dont have to lift your fingers up but merely it detects which side you have pressed down. before you click it detects nothing, because no pressure has been used to click.

586324975[/snapback]

The mouse senses which side your finger is on, thats all. You push down like on current one click mice. To do a right click YOU HAVE TO lift your finger off the left side, otherwise it will register a default LEFT click. I'm sitting here with it...

IT DOES NOT register what side you are asserting pressure on. Those are for the 3rd and 4th buttons only. The top two buttons do not use pressure sensors, but TOUCH sensors.

That's alright about the right-clicking issue. I usually lift my fingers anyway since I don't attempt to click while holding the left finger down - kind of like not keeping the brake pedal down while trying to accelerate? (ok that's not the same thing...).

My Mouse came today but I'm at uni. I couldn't get it yesterday because I was at uni while they tried to deliver it. Hope it arrives when I get home.

That's alright about the right-clicking issue. I usually lift my fingers anyway since I don't attempt to click while holding the left finger down - kind of like not keeping the brake pedal down while trying to accelerate? (ok that's not the same thing...).

My Mouse came today but I'm at uni. I couldn't get it yesterday because I was at uni while they tried to deliver it. Hope it arrives when I get home.

I still think it's cool looking. I hope you enjoy the mouse once you get to use it.

I'm a trackball user, so I guess that little scroll ball thing makes sense to me. I'm looking forward to trying one out just for fun.

yepp exactly. lets be clear.. YOU CANNOT right click if your finger is resting on the left click sensor

586326028[/snapback]

That's not exactly true. An excerpt from the Ars review:

Some readers have brought up the question of whether you are able to right-click while still physically touching the left side of the mouse. The answer to that question is "sort of." As it turns out, the top part of the shell is touch sensitive to a point, which was not immediately obvious to me upon first blush. I tested right-clicking with varying degrees of skin contact on the left side of the mouse and you can't be touching it "too much" on the left side before the right click gives up and you're now left clicking. Of course, the mouse works most predictably when you hover your index finger (if you are right-handed) above the mouse as you right-click with your middle or ring fingers, which is apparently what I do naturally but some other users do not. The line at which the threshold is drawn is rather blurry and it's hard to really know exactly how much touching is too much. The only clear solution I have for this is to recommend going down to an Apple Store in person to try it out and determine whether your subtle mousing habits will make this work for you or not.

It's clear you CAN be touching with both fingers. The weight/amount of touch is the question.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!