Mighty Mouse


Recommended Posts

Apple offers a standard wired Apple Keyboard and Mouse with all iMac G5 models. Options include upgrading to the Apple Wireless Keyboard and Mouse for a totally wireless experience. If desired, also choose a keyboard in other languages offered.

Taken from apples store when purchasing an iMac G5

An update from me...

The Mighty Mouse I bought last week is going back to the store today. I dont know if I got a dud, but my pointer has a habit of racing around the screen randomly. It'll be in the middle then all of a sudden it will race to a corner of the screen. Its like this on my MacMini and my PC.

Anyone else had this, or have I got a dud here?

Also noted: I installed the Mighty Mouse software on my MacMini. After putting in my old 2 button mouse, the extra buttons operate like the Mighty Mouse, it clicking the scroll wheel brings up dashboard etc... I just cant configure them unless I have the Mighty Mouse plugged in... interesting for some people perhaps?

An update from me...

The Mighty Mouse I bought last week is going back to the store today. I dont know if I got a dud, but my pointer has a habit of racing around the screen randomly. It'll be in the middle then all of a sudden it will race to a corner of the screen. Its like this on my MacMini and my PC.

Anyone else had this, or have I got a dud here?

586359847[/snapback]

I've got the standard apple mouse and the same happens with me. The pointer goes crazy on me.. Don't know if it's the mouse - started two-three weeks ago.

I received my mouse today.

What can I say? I think it's great for the scroll features, however with the right click... have I finally transitioned into the world of Mac completely? Because, I find myself actually Ctrl+Clicking instead of using the actual right click on the mouse. I would have thought that I would have been right on top of the right clicking from the get go, seeing that it is something that has become so standard, having been used to it for so many years.

I don't find it too much a hassle to lift one finger off of the mouse and the journalist from WSJ can lick my _ _ _ _. I think one just has to laugh at people who make a big deal out of it, sorry to all of you I might be offending--but I just have to giggle when people actually make lifting one finger such a hassle. Since it's the least you can ask of your body. I mean, I can understand the counter argument that other technologies exist, that beat out the current model of the mighty mouse, based on preference of users. I won't knock you. (Since I am more acceptable, seeing how many cringe at the fact of being a Mac-user alone.)

But, I've become comfortable using the Mighty Mouse without any problems as of yet. I do admit, I do have to think a little when it comes to clicking, but I don't blame that on any finger lifting, but rather I blame it on habit of hitting Ctrl+Clicking. One of the things I have told friends that is great about the Mac is voicing how proficient I have become in applications such as Microsoft Word due to all the shorthand commands I know without having to navigate through the menus. Control+Click, even though it is necessary to move one hand off the keyboard, irregardless, I think is one of those things.

So, I'll give it a thumbs up, but for the standard two-button user, I don't think this will satisfy you as much as it would a more-native user of the one button mouse in conjunction with the Mac OS.

An update from me...

The Mighty Mouse I bought last week is going back to the store today. I dont know if I got a dud, but my pointer has a habit of racing around the screen randomly. It'll be in the middle then all of a sudden it will race to a corner of the screen. Its like this on my MacMini and my PC.

Anyone else had this, or have I got a dud here?

Also noted: I installed the Mighty Mouse software on my MacMini. After putting in my old 2 button mouse, the extra buttons operate like the Mighty Mouse, it clicking the scroll wheel brings up dashboard etc... I just cant configure them unless I have the Mighty Mouse plugged in... interesting for some people perhaps?

586359847[/snapback]

it does that to me to but on both my old black and clear apple pro mouse and my white and clear apple pro mouse. the white and clear doesnt do it nearly as much as the black one but it does do it. so i really have no idea why but i wished it would get fixed, kinda annoying especially when it happens like dragging something.

it does that to me to but on both my old black and clear apple pro mouse and my white and clear apple pro mouse.  the white and clear doesnt do it nearly as much as the black one but it does do it.  so i really have no idea why but i wished it would get fixed, kinda annoying especially when it happens like dragging something.

586361191[/snapback]

Well i tried it last night before taking it back without a mouse mat and had absolutely no problems. Its definately a surface problem. Im using it on a non-shiny wood surface at the moment, but will be trying it on a matt black mouse mat later.

My guess its something to do with shiny surfaces as my original mouse mat was slightly shiny causing it to jump everywhere... Who knows!

Well i tried it last night before taking it back without a mouse mat and had absolutely no problems. Its definately a surface problem. Im using it on a non-shiny wood surface at the moment, but will be trying it on a matt black mouse mat later.

My guess its something to do with shiny surfaces as my original mouse mat was slightly shiny causing it to jump everywhere... Who knows!

586364710[/snapback]

thats w hat i was thinking but im not sure now. it has come to my attention that when it moves to the corner of the screen, its stuck there, and u have to pick the mouse back up to get it to move again. im not using a mouse pad on this desk and its sort of shinny so i might try a mouse pad but i was getting the feeling that it was software, but i dont know so ill test a mouse pad.

Mine just arrived via FedEx. My first impression is that the thing is way too small. But after using an Intellimouse they're vastly different in shape. I'll give it a few days to see if I can get used to it or end up selling it.

I've got a Mighty Mouse, and it's real cool but it still needs some work I think. I'd like to see the scroll wheel moved a little further towards the top of the mouse. I notice that in order to use the side buttons for expose I have to drop my hand down to use the scroll wheel. I'd rather be able to use all buttons with no repositioning of my hand.

I also notice that it keeps wanting to right click on me even though I'm trying to get my left click on. The only way to really avoid this from happening occassionally is to click with both fingers at the same time for a left click (depress both sides).

It's just taking some getting used to, but I do like it way better than the standard Apple mouse.

I just got mine delivered about 5 minutes ago.

The first OS I really used, meaning my own computer (and not counting whatever OS Commodore 64's used LOL) was System 7. Then around the time of OS 9 I also became a cross platform user, with Windows 98 I guess it had to bem or maybe it was still 95.

Anyway, I cannot count how many mice I have had over the years with my own digits I seriously think. From the first few months I did use an Apple One Button Mouse because I didnt know any better, to then purchasing my when I bought myself a MS IntelliMouse while still only using a Mac, to the mice that come with Wacom tablets, to the stupid little laptop mouse I bought for my Powerbook G3, all the way to the present where I use my MX1000 Ion my Windows comp and an MX700 on my mac, my point in sharing my history is I have used and tried alot of mice.

I am going to hook my Mighty Mouse up in a little while. Then I am going to use it for a good amount of time, at least a few days.

I will then come back and post my feelings and opinion as a Mouse User on both platforms, not just as a Mac user who is happy that Apple finally woke up and dropped such an outdated concept of a one button mouse, something they should have done so many years ago.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!