16 year old youth beaten by police


Recommended Posts

Originally posted by JediXAngel

"Family members said Donovan -- who attends special education classes -- has a hearing problem and a speech impediment and is sometimes slow to react, but that he would have been unlikely to provoke police. "

1. hearing problem

2. Speech impediment

3. slow to react

Not your average boy, he may not be 100% retard/stupid, but we do call people slow retarded sometimes, don't we?

last time i checked cops don't read minds, they couldn't of know that, probably thought he was high. most likely the kid was confused and scared, they misinterprupted his actions.

Originally posted by nagaina

Regardless the outcome of the case, you can rest assured this much will be true......there is going to be another negative mark against the White population of that city, and more than likely the entire US.

Not only will your tax dollars provide this guy with an 'instant lotto' type settlement, but every time he sees one of us 'WhiteDevils', you know he'll be thinking he got the best of us and our juducial system.

Now maybe the coloured community will riot and repeat the animal-like behaviour that occured during the Rodney King incident. Remember that ? .... They destroyed their own neighbourhoods, and what did we do .... we built them a new one from scratch. Way to go guys !!!

And in closing I say this.... God Bless the USI and congratulations on another great piece of media trash!

I see people in here talk of peace and getting along .... this will NEVER happen until we abolish the biggest emeny of all .... The ZOG and JudenMedia.

Enough 'said.

nagaina

Right...because word of mouth would be so much better. I really don't see how this story is being reported one way or another...it's just being reported. All the talk of racism is coming up from the people involved. If it's true, than it's their fault, if it's not true, than it's the people who are lying's fault. Along your lines we'd just be better off getting rid of ignorant people who can't interpret information...which is what the news media usually provides us.

Originally posted by JediXAngel

"Family members said Donovan -- who attends special education classes -- has a hearing problem and a speech impediment and is sometimes slow to react, but that he would have been unlikely to provoke police. "

1. hearing problem

2. Speech impediment

3. slow to react

Not your average boy, he may not be 100% retard/stupid, but we do call people slow retarded sometimes, don't we?

1. hearing problem -- Doesn't listen

2. Speech impediment -- Swears a lot.

3. Slow to react -- Lazy.

Not that I'm saying this is true, but it is another way of looking at it. Remeber, family members said this. Or else, yeah, he could be slow, but usually people aren't quick to label someone "retarded" or "mentally challenged" these days.

I was starting to wonder how long it would go before "retarted" would be corrected.

Not your average boy, he may not be 100% retard/stupid, but we do call people slow retarded sometimes, don't we?

Don't see how this is an issue. So, if a mentally handicapped (the correct phrase, not "retard/stupid") is on a street corner with a machine gun, people should just leave him/her alone, because their a "retard", right?

Maybe the cops should have administered an intelligence and aptitude test prior to interacting with the kid, so they'd know how to react to him when he lunged at them. Good call.

Cops aren't psychic, and it's easy to judge from the outside.

JediXAngel

I agree with you completely and I think you expressed you point of view very well.

People are attacking you because they can't defend what the cops did. They talk about race, but this is about bad cops who

got caught. Cops don't have a right to beat up criminals once the are in handcuffs.

I think its pathetic how some people judge cops/police based on a couple of cases... sure there exists 'crooked cops' all throughout the world just like criminals amass a huge population.

Law enforcement is needed and should be greatly appreciated because without them...this world would be alot worse :)

This case will work itself out... its too early to tell the whole story so why argue about it! the media always stirs up huge debates early.

Cant we all just get along?? :)

Take care everyone... and do have a great day!

Originally posted by JediXAngel

Well, I am offended because I think a bunch of you are already madeup your mind the Cop is not a racist, even though he may or may not!

Second, I think myself being very intelligent, very intuitive, and I don't care what you think of me. It's very pitiful to me, that I am judged young/immature/naive just because you don't agree with me that this cop is obviously not a racist, whatever happened to respect?

Can't I have an opinion this cop may in fact may be a racist? Oh I can't? If I think that way, then I am an idiot?!

Please :right:

If you don't have respect for someone else have a different opinion than yours, please DON'T become a cop! I beg you!!! I want all cops to be fair-minded, and respect people's opinion, and not be ignorant about things!

Are you foreign? Your sentence structure does not look like it comes from a young person to me. It seems as though you might not have a grasp on how the syntax of written english works.

Originally posted by ghostrider

People are attacking you because they can't defend what the cops did. They talk about race, but this is about bad cops who

got caught. Cops don't have a right to beat up criminals once the are in handcuffs.

he is lucky he didnt get shot.

its just a bunch of hype, it happens all the time, the kids prolly said somthing to **** him off, or did somthing.

no its not right, but you never know what the kid did... sure he will say nothing, but little smart ass punks should get a lesson every once and a while.

If the kid attacked police officers I am completely with the officer for striking back.

No-No-No.

He must only use the minimum force required to take control of the subject. This isn't a street brawl. It's law enforcement and those who lack professionalism give all of us a bad name. Once that kid was handcuffed it was over . . . PERIOD.

There is no justification for striking a person in custody. I don't care what happened in the then miniutes prior to the incident. I don't even care that he manhandled him onto the trunk of his squad. This officer later punched a handcuffed person . . . a person in his custody. There is no justification for that. No rationale and no defense of it. This officer diminished law enforcement in ways than cannot be measured.

Police Officers MUST maintain a higher standard of conduct. I don't care if this kid called him every vile name there is. It doesn't matter if he threatened him, his family or anyone else for that matter. He was "In Custody." Ignore him, tune him out, put him in your squad, but DO NOT PUNCH HIM!

-TR

Doesn't matter what the kid did or said...It was illegal as well as immoral for that cop to hit him like he did once he was handcuffed. There is no excuse for that kind of unprofessionalism by an officer of the law. Those of you that are quick to dismiss it better hope you don't have to deal with a jerk like that the next time you get pulled over for speeding.

Originally posted by Deckhand

but little smart ass punks should get a lesson every once and a while.

As immoral as it is I agree. I would like to see the 10mins of video before but as its worth a lot less showing a whole story it will never be found, how convenient. I wonder how much money was made with the tape?:(

Originally posted by intensityx

Doesn't matter what the kid did or said...It was illegal as well as immoral for that cop to hit him like he did once he was handcuffed. There is no excuse for that kind of unprofessionalism by an officer of the law. Those of you that are quick to dismiss it better hope you don't have to deal with a jerk like that the next time you get pulled over for speeding.

Don't speed and you won't have to worry about it. :right:

i live in toronto and its not unheard of to many (teens/young adults) that cops do beat the arrested either out of frustration or to get information. can't really do anything about it. the only reason it doesn't get onto the media cause there never happens to be someone video taping the situation. that is why this has so much hype, cause there happened to be someone videotaping the sh!t, and i dont think race had anything to do with it.

Originally posted by azazel-

Don't speed and you won't have to worry about it. :right:

Don't bring up speeding...it's the biggest waste of the police force's time. Waiting around on radar probably bores cops so much they get the urge to punch hand-cuffed kids to take out the stress.

Don't bring up speeding...it's the biggest waste of the police force's time. Waiting around on radar probably bores cops so much they get the urge to punch hand-cuffed kids to take out the stress.

Actually nothing could be further from the truth. It is proven that increased traffic enforcenment lowers accident rates and can impact crime rates overall.

The visible nature of the traffic stop can provide a presence in a community that will act as a deterrent to other crimes. Sh**heads see cops around all the time and go elsewhere. Depending upon the demographics it works like a charm.

If our community has a run of daytime home burglaries for example, we will begin aggressive traffic enforcement in the area to drive the criminals to other areas. Somemtimes we even get lucky and catch the burglars in the process. I've seen it work firsthand.

-TR

Originally posted by JediXAngel

And, how do you know for sure, the kid was being disrespectful and rude?

Seems like pre-judged to me :right:

NO. The Cop has no right to beat an Unarmed 'Retarded' Kid, especially after he was already cuffed. NOT WHATSOEVER!

How do you know that the kid wasn't disrespectful and rude? Because a bystanding "witness" or the media told you so?

And I would have to agree with Freeza.. cops have never been the first to be liked at all.. granted there are cops that can have an attitude, but you expect them to sing you a Teletubbies song when they pull you over for travelling 30 mph. over the speed limit, robbing a store, not showing up to court, and the thousands of other criminal acts? Like I said, you people have never seen anything outside of the show "Cops".. open your eyes, it happens.

I see your point TR, there are a lot of roads I know not to go fast on around my home. Mainly slow speed back roads because there will be cops there. And using a presence to stop burglaries makes sense too...but what about posting radar on main drags during rush hour? I can see stopping one or two idiots by doing it, but it hardly seems like it's a worth while use of an officer's time.

Maybe it's just where I drive. It seems kind of pointless to set up radar on 95 in CT when everyone is doing 80 mph in a 65...one guy might get pulled over, but usually people slow down for all of 10 seconds before they hit 80 again. The opposite happens when I'm driving up in Vermont...they'll pull over any car for doing 5 mph over the speed limit (so long as it's from out of state). That's not law enforcement, that's just disrupting the flow of traffic to make some money.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!