Recommended Posts

so yea im still confused what videocards can handle this kinda resolution

Once again, here is the list of totally confirmed desktop video cards that will work:

ATI Radeon X1800 CrossFire Edition

ATI Radeon X1800 XT

ATI Radeon X1800 XL

ATI Radeon X1600 XT

ATI Radeon X1600 Pro

That's it. The Radeon X1300 series has the option to support the DVI-D interface (which this monitor requires), but as far as I know, there is no shipping Radeon X1300 product that has implemented it yet.

NVIDIA just released ForceWare 82.12 today (12/22) on their nzone site.

The release notes specifically mention...

? Added support for the Dell 3007WFP panel

So, any Nvidia cards with DVI-D support should support this monitor now.

I know that my Quadro FX 2000 has one DVI-D port and my Quadro FX 4000 has dual DVI-D's, so I'll be stress testing the 4000 with my 2405 and a 3007 (when I can order it) - simultaneously.

Can I make the Quadro cry uncle?

I'm surprised that nobody cares about the fact that almost NO DESKTOP GRAPHICS CARD can use this monitor. NONE of NVIDIA's GeForce series of video cards are equipped with a dual-link DVI interface, which this monitor requires.

uhh . . :no:

82.12 Release Highlights:

* Adds support for GeForce 6800 GS AGP.

* Adds support for Dell 3007WFP panel. :)

* Mixed vendor support for NVIDIA SLI.

* TV-Out/HD-out support for NVIDIA SLI.

* Added support for VSync on Direct3D games when running NVIDIA SLI.

* Performance enhancements for dual-core CPUs.

* PureVideo high definition MPEG-2 de-interlacing support.

* Usability enhancements when connecting to an HDTV.

* Microsoft? DirectX? 9.0c and OpenGL? 2.0 support

* For a full list of fixed and known issues please view the Release Notes.

ftp://download.nvidia.com/Windows/8...nxp_english.exe

ya know - Im thinking a 30 " LCD is almost TOO big - for most desktops/PC gamers etc. If youre sitting approx 1.5 feet from this thing its like a relative movie screen where you have to move your head instead of moving your eyes....or am I just trying to talk myself out of buying one ?? :blush:

Once again, here is the list of totally confirmed desktop video cards that will work:

ATI Radeon X1800 CrossFire Edition

ATI Radeon X1800 XT

ATI Radeon X1800 XL

ATI Radeon X1600 XT

ATI Radeon X1600 Pro

That's it. The Radeon X1300 series has the option to support the DVI-D interface (which this monitor requires), but as far as I know, there is no shipping Radeon X1300 product that has implemented it yet.

I'm surprised that nobody cares about the fact that almost NO DESKTOP GRAPHICS CARD can use this monitor. NONE of NVIDIA's GeForce series of video cards are equipped with a dual-link DVI interface, which this monitor requires. Only their Quadro FX series has that. On the ATI side of things, you will have to have either a Radeon X1800 XT or Radeon X1800 XL, which have two dual-link DVI ports; or the Radeon X1600 XT and Radeon X1600 Pro, which can have either a single or two dual-link DVI ports. Some Radeon X1300 Pro cards might have a single dual-link DVI port as well, but it is up the board manufacturers (I don't think any of them have done it yet).

In case you are wondering how Anandtech.com and other places can test games at resolutions even higher than this monitor on NVIDIA and ATI cards, it is because they are using a high-end CRT, which is a completely different type of technology and uses a totally different interface (the 15-pin D-Sub).

Okay my, admittedly limited, understanding is that video cards have DVI-I connectors which are effectively DVI-D + DVI-A. So it really boils down to which cards support a dual-link connection to support this board, 2 would be nice but seriously 2x30"?!.

From nVidia FAQ:

The Apple 30-inch Cinema HD Display runs at a native resolution of 2560x1600. This resolution is higher than most graphic cards are able to support. In order to drive the ultra high resolution of the Apple 30-inch Cinema Display HD, a graphics card needs to include a dual-link DVI port. A graphics card which features a dual-link DVI port combines two TMDS transmitters to drive higher digital resolutions than a single TMDS transmitter is capable of. This is different from a card which provides dual DVI connectors. Most graphic cards provide a single link DVI connector(s).

On the Apple Macintosh platform, the following graphic controllers supports the Apple 30" Cinema Display in its native resolution at the time of this publication:

NVIDIA Geforce 6800Ultra DDL AGP for Powermac G5

NVIDIA Geforce 6800GT DDL AGP for Powermac G5

NVIDIA Geforce 6600 PCI Express for Powermac G5(PCI Express)

NVIDIA Geforce 7800GT PCI Express for Powermac G5(PCI Express)

NVIDIA QuadroFX 4500 PCI Express for Powermac G5(PCI Express)

For the PC Windows platform, the following graphic cards support the Apple 30" Cinema Display:

NVIDIA QuadroFX 2000

NVIDIA QuadroFX 3000

NVIDIA QuadroFX 3400

NVIDIA QuadroFX 3450

NVIDIA QuadroFX 4000

NVIDIA QuadroFX 4400

NVIDIA QuadroFX 4500

NVIDIA Geforce 7800GT

NVIDIA Geforce 7800GTX

NVIDIA Geforce 7800GTX 512

For more information on the Apple 30" Cinema Display, please visit Apple's website at:

http://www.apple.com/displays/

Please note that the Apple 30-inch Cinema Display HD will not operate in DOS mode on the PC.

--------------------------------------

I think that pretty much throws you proclamations out of the window, no?

Edited by stlic

You should really do some research before posting such false information. I checked out the websites of all of the manufacturers' of GeForce 7800 and GeForce 6800 series cards. I found out that NO ONE has made a GeForce product with a dual-link DVI port. ALL of the GeForce 7800 series cards are equipped with dual DVI-I connectors. ASUS also does not list a GeForce 6800 vanilla card with a DVI-D connector, only with a single DVI-I connector. So, as I said originally, there has never been a GeForce card with a DVI-D connector. NVIDIA did make a special GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL for Apple that came with dual DVI-D connectors, but that card cannot be used in a PC system.

As for ATI, I also checked them out. ATI does say on its website that Radeon X850 and Radeon X800 products can support a single DVI-D port, but after checking all of the websites of the add-in board partners (along with Built By ATI cards), I once again found out that there has never been a Radeon X850 or Radeon X800 card equipped with a dual-link DVI port.

So, what you are left with is the Radeon X1800 series that all have two DVI-D connectors, the Radeon X1600 series that all have at least one DVI-D connector (although it is possible to have two of them), and potentially the Radeon X1300 series, which although they can have a DVI-D connector, I am not aware of any manufacturer doing this yet. The NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 has two DVI-D connectors, and most of the rest of the Quadro FX lineup has at least one DVI-D connector.

What is the difference between DVI-D or DVI-I?

Often the safest choice for a DVI Cable for a new DVI video card connecting to a DVI Monitor is a DVI-I to DVI-I single link cable. If the card and monitor are more resent a dual link cable may be needed. In most cases either will work. If a connection is DVI-D, and properly designed, you will not be able to plug in a DVI-I cable but should use a DVI-D cable, even if one of the devices you are connecting is DVI-I. If your monitor is older and you want to ensure that you are using the digital connection, a DVI-D cable would usually be a better choice.

Here.

DVI-I - Both DVI-D and DVI-A

DVI-I format is an integrated cable which is capable of transmitting either a digital-to-digital signal or an analog-to-analog signal, but it will not work transmitting a digital-to-analog or analog-to-digital signal. DVI-I contains both the digital and analog connections, (DVI-D + DVI-A) , it's essentially a combination of DVI-D and DVI-A cables within one cable. (female connection on back of video card shown for DVI-I)

Here.

DVI-I:

DVI-I contains both the digital and analog connections, (DVI-D + DVI-A) , it's essentially a combination of DVI-D and DVI-A cables within one cable. The I is for Integrated meaning a combination of both signals D and A.

Here.

2) I need a DVI-I to DVI-D cable - What part number do I buy?

You can purchase any DVI-D to DVI-D Cable as that is what you will be using.

Same source.

This is where the specification divides itself in two; the DVI-D connector features only the 24-pins necessary for purely digital operation while a DVI-I connector features both the 24 digital pins and the 5 analog pins. Officially there is no such thing as a DVI-A analog connector with only the 5 analog pins although some literature may indicate otherwise. By far, the vast majority of graphics cards with DVI support feature DVI-I connectors.

Here.

Okay so that above all say the same thing. The DVI-I connector on video cards is capable of handling both DVI-D and DVI-A. As the Dell 30" uses DVI-D you would simply need to use a DVI-D cable which would fit perfectly fine on the card's DVI-I socket.

I think you are confused.

DVI-I - 1 cable 1 connection

DVI-D - 1 cable 2 connections

Only some graphics cards have DVI-D (the D is for Dual) this monitor will not work over a DVI-I connection only a DVI-D connection.

It's so big that it requires 2 channels to deliver that high resolution.

The 2005FPW and 2405FPW work over DVI-I and DVI-D (without utilising the D part as DVI-D is backwards compatible with DVI-I cables and devices)

In this picture you can see the different DVI standards http://www.cable4pc.com/jpg/all.jpg

Almost 6000 posts right?!?

Sorry back to the original post I was dissecting.

I checked out the websites of all of the manufacturers' of GeForce 7800 and GeForce 6800 series cards. I found out that NO ONE has made a GeForce product with a dual-link DVI port. ALL of the GeForce 7800 series cards are equipped with dual DVI-I connectors.

PNY

Dual DVI-I Connectors

1 Single Link TMDS DVI Connector

1 Dual Link TMDS DVI Connector

eVGA

Resolution & Refresh

240 Hz Max Refresh Rate

2048 x 1536 x 32bit x 85 Hz Max Analog

2560 x 1600 and 1600 x 1200 Max Digital

"Sinle [sIC]Dual-Link TMDS Connector

-For a dual link TMDS, which is in essence two TMDS links bonded together, can display at resolutions up to 2048 x 1536 - and is the connector of choice for users of extremely large digital flat panels.

eVGA 7800GTX PDF Spec Sheet

"1 Dual Link TMDS DVI Connector"

Needless to say repeated in the spec sheets on their entire 7800 range.

Edited by stlic

Continued from previous post for completions sake:

To back up the fact that DVI-D is simply a derivative of DVI-I do you know what the specifications for the 2405 say is required for DVI connection? Do you know which cable is supplied with the screen (in front of me now)?

No prizes for guessing correctly.

In addition to the above links (if not sufficient) I've set up a Google search for you where you can see multiple mentions of a single dual-link DVI connection being present on 7800 series cards.

Some example taken pretty much at random:

The biggest hurdle to seeing more manufacturers release dual link DVI panels like Apple's (other than the sheer cost of the panel) is that very few video cards feature a dual link DVI output. It used to be that only professional graphics cards had dual link TMDS transmitters on board, but more recently, NVIDIA has outfitted their GeForce 7800 GTX with a single dual link TMDS transmitter. ATI not only followed in NVIDIA's footsteps, but improved by outfitting their Radeon X1800 XT with two dual link TMDS transmitters, to support two dual link DVI flat panel displays. Of course, this all applies to the PC side, as NVIDIA launched a version of their GeForce 6800 Ultra with two dual link DVI outputs for the Mac when Apple first released their 30" Cinema Display.

Here.

The backplate has the familiar dual DVI with a single dual-link DVI transmitter for supporting high-resolution displays along with a VIVO port.

Here.

The product is equipped with two DVI jacks (of course, Dual-Link), it supports VIVO.

Here.

More: www.avault.com

www.guru3d.com

The cooler hides the dual-link TMDS that drives the first of two DVI ports. The dual-link TMDS can drive larger digital displays than the single-link (1600 x 1200) DVI links on almost all other Nvidia boards made to date.

The Register

PNY was thoughtful with the bundled adapters, too. The Verto card has two digital video outputs--a great feature for those with LCD monitors. PNY also provides two DVI-toVGA adapters, which you'll need if you still have a CRT or an analog-only LCD. Like all GeForce 7800 GT cards, the Verto is capable of running dual-link DVI. This lets you achieve a maximum resolution of 2,560x1,600 at a 60Hz refresh rate, which high-end monitors such as Apple's 30-inch Cinema HD Display require.

CNET 7800 GT Review

A quick look at the box revealed something I must admit I didn?t realise, namely that the GTX has a dual-link TMDS transmitter, enabling you to drive a screen of up to 3,840 x 2,400 resolution ? that?s nine megapixels of display to play with. Alternatively, you could have two 24in screens attached to the card - one hanging off each DVI port, such as this very impressive Dell display.

Trusted Reviews 7800 GTX

You should really do some research before posting such false information.[/b]n.
You should really do some research before posting such false information.[/b]n.
You should really do some research before posting such false information.[/b]n.
You should really do some research before posting such false information.[/b]n.

Truer words have rarely been spoken.

EDIT: Actually this thread is full of misinformation but worse than that posters that actually posted seemingly accurate information were shouted down as being ill-informed with no evidence to prove them wrong. Unbelievable, particularly coming from members that have high post counts. I think is says a lot about the calibre of some Neowin members when they do not research something before writing it down as gospel. Even with the above information I would say that until I have a Dell 3007 in front of me connected to my 7800 GT I would not say that 100% is would work or it wouldn't work. The evidence simply points to the likelyhood that it would work fine.

Edited by stlic

Once again, here is the list of totally confirmed desktop video cards that will work:

ATI Radeon X1800 CrossFire Edition

ATI Radeon X1800 XT

ATI Radeon X1800 XL

ATI Radeon X1600 XT

ATI Radeon X1600 Pro

That's it. The Radeon X1300 series has the option to support the DVI-D interface (which this monitor requires), but as far as I know, there is no shipping Radeon X1300 product that has implemented it yet.

Thats not it, people have been using the Apple 30inch display for well over 12 months now and that requires a similar connection method. How would people have used them if the only range of cards that support it wasnt released until 2 months ago.

As people have said, support is based on the card manufacturer, many older cards will work but in those older lineups dual DVI wasnt a chipset specification, just some companies offered it.

I think a lot of people are getting confused here. DVI-I and DVI-D have nothing to do with wether it is dual link or not. DVI-I just means it can do analog/digital and DVI-D is digital-only.

Also when people talk about sites listing 2048x1536 for the maximum resolution etc. For starters that isnt the maximum resolution of the card's hardware, and that is calculated using the cards RAMDAC. on DVI-D you arent using the RAMDAC so those numbers become useless.

All you need to do is find out if its dual link or not (which may be difficult) to figure out if you can run this display at the full resolution/refresh rate.

Another thing I think people don't know is that even a single link can run this display at the full resolution just at a reduced refresh rate, such as 30 Hz instead of 60 Hz. Sure this isnt nice for gaming but it could be acceptable for desktop work. Unless, of course; the display doesnt accept a refresh that low, which would be gay.

I have a geforce go 7800 GTX; I know the desktop cards have a dual link connector however on my laptop it only has a DVI-D port. It definitely will take a dual link DVI cable but I don't know whether or not it has DUAL TMDS transmitters.

I am guessing you can't overclock the DVI like you can with the RAMDAC, an example is on an external CRT through the 15-pin DSUB I am pushing 420 MHz through the RAMDAC @ [email protected] Hz. This prooves that a lot of the specs on sites about max resolution/etc are worthless unless they think there are enough people around that would actually run at those settings. It definitely does not mean the card can't do it.

so, the max resolution stated on pages, is not the max of the card, its just the one people would use at maximum? I believe that so far there has been no need for such monstrous resolutions, meaning that those of us with 7800GTX can use this monitor then?

so, the max resolution stated on pages, is not the max of the card, its just the one people would use at maximum? I believe that so far there has been no need for such monstrous resolutions, meaning that those of us with 7800GTX can use this monitor then?

according to the nvidia site the geforce 7800 series have a dual link card dvi port and can run the 3007WFP/30 inch apple.

Also its usually very hard to find the DVI spec's of a card, almost always the max resolution/etc are the analog resolutions through the 15 pin VGA. DVI-D doesnt use the RAMDAC so those numbers have no connection with what resolution it can do through DVI-D.

as someone already posted nvidia FAQ says the geforce 7800 series are dual link:

http://nvidia.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/nvidia....li=&p_topview=1

This is in reply to stlic's prior posts (no way was I gonna quote those suckas):

Wow. Wow. Wow. For only 40 posts, I already feel like I should bow down to you. Bravo for showing people what a real, honest to goodness I've done my research post is like. Just so you know, I'm clapping my hands right now for you (and my cat is starring at me like I'm crazy or something).

I'm still confused on one part though. So when a video cards says it has dual DVI-I connectors, what does this truely mean? A single single-link DVI and a single dual-link DVI? Because I assumed that unless it specifically says it has a dual-link DVI or a DVI-D port, it doesn't have it (oh, and sorry I mised PNY's website; I totally forgot about them).

And one last note. If this massive thread has taught me anything, it's that manufacturers need to really re-think how their label the outputs of the video cards they make. DVI-A, DVI-I, DVI-D; all practically meaningless now. They need to really just type it out on their websites the way it is: One Single-link Plus One Dual-Link, or Two Dual-Link, or whatever.

The 3007WFP User manual

http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/systems/3007WFP/

I only wish it had all the extra connections that 2405 has like composite, component and PIP. I don't know if there's any solution to that problem so I can have xbox360 and a tv sat receiver connected to this monitor

This is in reply to stlic's prior posts (no way was I gonna quote those suckas):

Wow. Wow. Wow. For only 40 posts, I already feel like I should bow down to you. Bravo for showing people what a real, honest to goodness I've done my research post is like. Just so you know, I'm clapping my hands right now for you (and my cat is starring at me like I'm crazy or something).

I'm still confused on one part though. So when a video cards says it has dual DVI-I connectors, what does this truely mean? A single single-link DVI and a single dual-link DVI? Because I assumed that unless it specifically says it has a dual-link DVI or a DVI-D port, it doesn't have it (oh, and sorry I mised PNY's website; I totally forgot about them).

And one last note. If this massive thread has taught me anything, it's that manufacturers need to really re-think how their label the outputs of the video cards they make. DVI-A, DVI-I, DVI-D; all practically meaningless now. They need to really just type it out on their websites the way it is: One Single-link Plus One Dual-Link, or Two Dual-Link, or whatever.

lol.... looking back it looks like I really was bored at the time...:p

Two DVI-I connectors means just that and is different from single or dual link DVI. Both single and dual link DVI use the DVI-I connector. DVI-D is a component of DVI-I, basically DVI-I = DVI-D + DVI-A. If a card has DVI-I it can handle both DVI-D AND DVI-A.

Agree with you on the last point; even though reviews and nVidia's own website cover the fact that 7800 GT and GTX cards have a single dual-link capable DVI-I (remember DVI-I can handle DVI-D) manufacturers don't make it very clear. I checked all the nVidia board companies and did not find the capability clearly stated in most. I guess this is simply because it is a feature that can be considered as having limited appeal and so manuacturers simply forget. As mentioned above by another poster manufacturers themselves regularly get maximum supported resolutions wrong. I remember when I was looking for a card capable of 1920x1200 I was given 1600x1200 as the theoretical DVI max when in reality most modern cards can handle the higher res without problems.

Also if you have a DVI LCD have a look at the connector that goes into your graphics card, is should be DVI-D and then look at your graphics card which will be DVI-I.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!