Nero Burning Rom Alternatives


Recommended Posts

@ Growled

Thanks!

@Subject Delta

I put non working links on purpose because of the danger that those websites represents. Lot of them are offering burning programs bundled with viruses, trojans and some other nasty stuff. :)

If those programs are bundled with dodgy files, surely the thing would be to not link to them at all? :/

  • 1 month later...

You cant burn audio CDs with ImgBurn. Thats the only - it has.

You actually can. It's not the most convenient way of doing it, but it's possible.

http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?showtopic=5555

You actually can. It's not the most convenient way of doing it, but it's possible.

http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?showtopic=5555

Thats a workaround and you are burning a .CUE file, not making a audio CD.

.CUE files "break up" audio files to split them into different tracks.

It works*? Yes. Is it truely a audio CD? No.

* - If you dont have the decoders for FLAC files and you have FLAC files, then this will not work.

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 year later...
  • 1 month later...

nero hasn't been the best since version 6, before they started adding tones of unneeded bloat

it's rather sad, I used to love Nero :(

as did I....but I use IMGburn and/or converters, always convert to ISO, and NEVER have any problems. I can split mutiple copies of discs out pretty darn quick when needed to, with a SATA DVD/CD R-RW drive...using free software with WAY lots less hard drive space required. Nero=dust in the wind. Just sayin'. To each his/her own.

  • 6 months later...

nero hasn't been the best since version 6, before they started adding tones of unneeded bloat

it's rather sad, I used to love Nero :(

^^^This definitely. Its just way too much bloat. I find myself needing to burn fewer and fewer discs is why I have gotten away from being so dependent on Nero. I dont think I would have made that change had nero stayed unbloated.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!