Vista Build 5342 Released - Official Topic


Recommended Posts

Not in the UK and probably the rest of Europe. Almost all BB modems in the UK are USB for some reason.

No, they're not. I know a lot of people that use Telewest blueyonder and only one connects via. USB.

thats why it wont install

i need to free space on the hardd rivr to something bigger than 46gb

Are you a legit tester? 'Cause I can't believe you can't diagnose that problem. You may have 46gb free, but is that on your primary hard drive? (The C: drive/boot drive). f*ck what the message says, I believe it has to be 500+ mb available on the primary hdd that is also the computer's boot drive. But, you knew that, aye? :|

I'm still awaiting my nomination...about another week or so, then I'll finally be able to pick up the next build...but i'm sure someone else'll help

That site that everyone is mentioning does contain a few inacuracies. Altho i will say that if you re-read his blog post he says anything with an astrisk(sp?) (the * thing) means it may or may not be in this build but should be in future builds

Now the Aero questions glass will not change for anyone untill the beta2/RC0 milestone build. There seems to be some confusion as to what will happen with various hardware if you run this build so I shall explain

Look below and match up your cards capabilities:

DX7: no glass, unless you hack the hell out of it as has been done in the past.

DX8: The screenshots you seen thus far is what you wil get. Your going to install the build and find yourself with the same glass thats been in every other build to date. Its glass rendered by use of png files inside the msstyle This is also known as Aero Express. Its not as fast as vector based glass, but dont take the current preformance as a standard because preformance enhancements are not yet being preformed to the builds. So png glass should get a lot faster, just wont be as fast or smooth as vector glass.

DX9: Users with a DX9 card will get what is truely and rightfully called "Aero Glass" (not matter what microsoft has told you is Aero Glass up to this point) This glass will be rendered with code, not image files. Thus it is rendered via pixel shaders and is vector based. It looks visually a lot better (from reports) than the glass we have now. A demonstration of the the capabilities of this glass was shown off with build 5060 at the last winhec ('04) This build did indeed use the vector based glass and did not use png files to make up the glass, dont really bother looking for screenshots of 5060 because I promise the glass will look drasticly different to what we are going to get with beta2

Now microsoft is correct in saying they dont have anything else but glass as the final UI. They are holding back 3 Key elements of the UI tho. Glass described above is the first, the second and third are Preview pane aurora and Desktop aurora. Both will be fully animated and visually appealing. Proof of the Preview pane aurora was found on the microsoft. com/ windowsvista site a few months ago. You can recognize this shot because it shows the control pannel explorer window with the preview pane on the left and a little thing that microsoft calls "vista flare" in the preview pane. The pane is green btw (in case you want to hunt down this shot.) More recently the "flare" item was shown on the front page of microsoft.com in a flash animation. I discovered the "flare" name by decompiling the swf and looking inside which revealed the "flare" name.

Now I dont care to argue any of this with anyone because im right. Microsoft has no reason to pull any of the above from vista, but should they that doesnt make me wrong because at the time of writing they are still going to put those 3 above mentioned items in vista (regardless of what you may think).

Are you a legit tester? 'Cause I can't believe you can't diagnose that problem. You may have 46gb free, but is that on your primary hard drive? (The C: drive/boot drive). f*ck what the message says, I believe it has to be 500+ mb available on the primary hdd that is also the computer's boot drive. But, you knew that, aye? :|

I'm still awaiting my nomination...about another week or so, then I'll finally be able to pick up the next build...but i'm sure someone else'll help

i have a 100gb drive partitioned with windows xp on half and wanted to put vista on the other half.

so should i make the ( c ) drive bigger, lets say 60gb or above ?

i want to test vista, but mostly i just want to have it

That site that everyone is mentioning does contain a few inacuracies. Altho i will say that if you re-read his blog post he says anything with an astrisk(sp?) (the * thing) means it may or may not be in this build but should be in future builds

Now the Aero questions glass will not change for anyone untill the beta2/RC0 milestone build. There seems to be some confusion as to what will happen with various hardware if you run this build so I shall explain

Look below and match up your cards capabilities:

DX7: no glass, unless you hack the hell out of it as has been done in the past.

DX8: The screenshots you seen thus far is what you wil get. Your going to install the build and find yourself with the same glass thats been in every other build to date. Its glass rendered by use of png files inside the msstyle This is also known as Aero Express. Its not as fast as vector based glass, but dont take the current preformance as a standard because preformance enhancements are not yet being preformed to the builds. So png glass should get a lot faster, just wont be as fast or smooth as vector glass.

DX9: Users with a DX9 card will get what is truely and rightfully called "Aero Glass" (not matter what microsoft has told you is Aero Glass up to this point) This glass will be rendered with code, not image files. Thus it is rendered via pixel shaders and is vector based. It looks visually a lot better (from reports) than the glass we have now. A demonstration of the the capabilities of this glass was shown off with build 5060 at the last winhec ('04) This build did indeed use the vector based glass and did not use png files to make up the glass, dont really bother looking for screenshots of 5060 because I promise the glass will look drasticly different to what we are going to get with beta2

Now microsoft is correct in saying they dont have anything else but glass as the final UI. They are holding back 3 Key elements of the UI tho. Glass described above is the first, the second and third are Preview pane aurora and Desktop aurora. Both will be fully animated and visually appealing. Proof of the Preview pane aurora was found on the microsoft. com/ windowsvista site a few months ago. You can recognize this shot because it shows the control pannel explorer window with the preview pane on the left and a little thing that microsoft calls "vista flare" in the preview pane. The pane is green btw (in case you want to hunt down this shot.) More recently the "flare" item was shown on the front page of microsoft.com in a flash animation. I discovered the "flare" name by decompiling the swf and looking inside which revealed the "flare" name.

Now I dont care to argue any of this with anyone because im right. Microsoft has no reason to pull any of the above from vista, but should they that doesnt make me wrong because at the time of writing they are still going to put those 3 above mentioned items in vista (regardless of what you may think).

Nice synthesis, thanks for clearing up this :)

i cant install it ??? wtf

i have over 46gb on the drive i want to install it on

It's not complaining about the drive you want to install it on, it actually copies the installer data to another partition, most likely your current Windows drive so it can boot from it. Check to see if your C: partition has enough free space.

i have a 100gb drive partitioned with windows xp on half and wanted to put vista on the other half.

so should i make the ( c ) drive bigger, lets say 60gb or above ?

Try checksumming the file (or rather, check the CRC) and see if yer ISO's corrupted. Also, if possible, try burning to DVD. And no, don't make the drive bigger - I've installed all Longhorn/Vista builds from my start in 4074 onto a 9gb partition with complete success in terms of available space. Of course, I hate using virtual drives and always burn the dvds...but still.

i want to test vista, but mostly i just want to have it

I'm not saying this is a problem, but really, couldn't you come up with something better than that :huh:? Most of the rest of the topic readers just "want to have it" -- but if all the Connect testers were like that, well, that'd just be bad news...[thankfully they're not though, but remember what you're representing]

They're free-floating as well as attached (you open em up initially attached, then you detach them by dragging them off.) Nice stuff, but honestly - I wish I would have seen a more amiable progression that included some sorely missed features of the 4074 sidebar.

Try checksumming the file (or rather, check the CRC) and see if yer ISO's corrupted. Also, if possible, try burning to DVD. And no, don't make the drive bigger - I've installed all Longhorn/Vista builds from my start in 4074 onto a 9gb partition with complete success in terms of available space. Of course, I hate using virtual drives and always burn the dvds...but still.

I'm not saying this is a problem, but really, couldn't you come up with something better than that :huh:? Most of the rest of the topic readers just "want to have it" -- but if all the Connect testers were like that, well, that'd just be bad news...[thankfully they're not though, but remember what you're representing]

well there saying i dont have enough drive space on my ( c ) boot drive. i may have enough to install on ( g ) drive.

i have a 250gb sata drive i could use for vista, then partition it to run xp on half and vista on the other. ive heard you cant run vista beta on a sata drive ?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!