DEFINITIVE: Which Linux Distro? (poll for 2007-08)


The Definitive Linux Poll for 2007!  

881 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Linux Distro?

    • Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Xubuntu
      533
    • Debian/Shift/Mepis/Knoppix/Kanotix/Xandros/Elive
      53
    • Fedora Core/Redhat/RHEL/CentOS/WBEL
      73
    • OpenSUSE/SUSE/Novell
      76
    • Gentoo/Sabayon
      46
    • Mandriva/PCLinuxOS
      23
    • Slackware/Slax/Zenwalk
      20
    • Arch
      47
    • Linspire/Freespire
      2
    • Damn Small/Puppy
      8
  2. 2. Which destop environment / window manager?

    • GNOME
      532
    • KDE
      203
    • fluxbox/openbox/blackbox
      33
    • Xfce
      37
    • Enlightenment/E17
      8
    • IceVM
      2
    • TWM or something equally basic
      1
    • GUI? pft. CLI or die!
      18
    • other
      18
    • whatever my distro came with. Is there a choice?
      29
  3. 3. I use Linux primarily as a...

    • Desktop (for school, work, home, games)
      385
    • Media Centre (primarily for videos & music)
      8
    • Server (web,ftp,file/print)
      58
    • Desktop/Media Centre Mixed Use
      85
    • Desktop/Server Mixed Use
      55
    • Media Centre/Server Mixed Use
      3
    • Desktop/Media Centre/Server (I use it for everything)
      89
    • I don't really use it for anything but learning Linux
      171
    • Other
      27


Recommended Posts

Stuck Ubuntu 7.10 on this, but it didnt like XFS+Grub and EXT3 was wasting a lotta space.

Woulda tried shift but no X86_64 version! Doh! :)

Now trying arch linux, nice and speedy, very lite with xfce4, but having trouble with my own kernel and dynticks code (interrupt 3 errors out on my marvell onboard lan). Gonna try another kernel build to sort this today, hopefully without having to go with nohz option. Arch seems a nice cross between gentoo and mainline distros, with the dual installers (pacman or build from source) interesting :) JFS is really fast too, nicer to the disk then XFS imo also. Made some CFLAGS changes :)

So I'd have voted with arch personally! Well, today :huh:

(for our readers!)

Fixed this in the BIOS by setting my Audigy 2 ZS to another main IRQ (was sharing with marvell LAN IRQ) and turned off PnP (reserved IRQ3).nohz=off didnt help! dmesg is happy again...

Nice to have my IRQs a bit more sensibly used anyhow.

Using Arch now, pretty speedy!

  • 2 weeks later...

openSuSE 10.3 / KDE 3.5.7 / Compiz-Fusion

Just started working with it this past weekend and I'm very much a noob on Linux. However, the install was easy and the distro appears to be solid.

I'm keeping my dual boot with Vista, so I won't be a "convert" anytime soon. :cool:

Currently using Linux Mint. Love Ubuntu, but I find that Mint is going in a little different direction that I like so far. Plus is comes with the w32 codecs already installed, a near insignificant but nice bonus. I used to use Mandriva for all my installs but found the community and guides around Ubuntu to be more plentiful and ultimately persuaded me over. Also using Gnome right now with a few compiz-fusion effects.

  • 2 weeks later...

I've switched* from Knoppix with GNOME to Knoppix with KDE4.

On the P3-800Mhz laptop that has only 192MB RAM, I use Knoppix with Fluxbox.

Edit: When I say "switched" I simply mean that I have KDE4 selected as the default login choice. I didn't need to reinstall Knoppix or anything.

I've switched* from Knoppix with GNOME to Knoppix with KDE4.

On the P3-800Mhz laptop that has only 192MB RAM, I use Knoppix with Fluxbox.

Edit: When I say "switched" I simply mean that I have KDE4 selected as the default login choice. I didn't need to reinstall Knoppix or anything.

I found that I preferred KDE over Gnome when I used them.*

I used flux to get extra performance out of my aging box, and fell in love with it **, so now I use it for my new rig. I would have to rank XFCE as my next favorite, though, above KDE and Gnome.

*This was back about 5 years ago, so both KDE and Gnome have advanced since then.

** When I say "fell in love", I obviously meant it figuratively.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

If I am going to do any serious work on a Linux box, I have to install Gentoo, it's just in my blood. I know it's terribly inefficient and overly complicated when compared to something like Ubuntu (which is an amazing distro in its own right) but it was my first distro and the only one I'd say I know inside and out.

If I want an install to be up and functional at the drop of a hat, I'll install Ubuntu. My parents rock Ubuntu, it's perfect for every day computing.

In any case, I tend to use Gnome. I love Fluxbox and Ion 3, but I usually come crawling back to Gnome just because it seems more efficient to have the whole "Desktop Environment" package. If I am installing for someone else, they get Gnome. It's just less hassle than KDE. I know this comes at the cost of less configuration options, but really the people I'm installing for are better off having less options to frak with.

In the end though, it comes down to what you are comfortable with. If you want to use TWM 24/7, awesome, more power to you. If don't even want to install an X11 server, great. If it works for you, it works.

Those results are quite interesting, how many people that just use linux to to try it/learn about it! Thinking about it, I suppose thats all I really used it for also. But when the compatibility for Windows software becomes better (or developers start developing for linux more) then I will probably go to linux full time instead of the Vista and beyond route.

It's Debian for me.. Etch (the current stable version) doesn't come with the latest and greatest packages (compared to Ubuntu) but APT-Pinning it with the Unstable/Testing repos solves that problem to an extent.

As for the Desktop, I've never liked anything other than KDE!

  • 3 weeks later...

Ubuntu for now on my laptop. This is mostly personal, not for work or anything, just to get back into the groove :p

I will eventually hit Arch Linux or Debian Etch. I'm aiming for a more minimalist distro with more control over the installation and configuration but with a good and updated packaging system, so that might do the trick.

Heck, I might consider even Slackware, ok maybe not, I don't have that patience anymore :rofl:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!