Your Windows Experience Index rating!


Recommended Posts

intel qx6600

kingston hyperx ddr2 9600 4x1gb

msi 8800gtx oc ed.

msi p35 diamond

wd raptor x

lian-li A10

zalman cnps9700

thermaltake 750w

testip7.jpg

Edited by hllwn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm extremely lazy, so you get this is special textificated form instead of picture.

Windows Exerpience Index base score of 3.4

Processor: 3.4

Memory (RAM): 4.2

Graphics: 5.9

Gaming Graphics: 4.9

Primary Hard Disk: 5.2

It's a Athlon 2400XP, 1280mb of PC2700, an X800PRO on AGP8x and a 7200rpm maxtor hard-drive as primary. It copes with Vista rather nicely, especially given its age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Processor 4.2

RAM 4.3

Graphics 5.9

Gaming Graphics 5.7

Primary hard disc: 5.9

My CPU and RAM are really my bottleneck, I will be building a new computer before the year is over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys just a small note, please post your system specs as well with your scores, otherwise it just doesn't make any sense :) that will add value to this thread as performance comparison method between different hardware configuration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:hump: typical of M$ to lazy to write an subroutine to give an average of the scores made they just said stuff it give them a score of the lowest component and that'll do now see sidvicious up there gets a lousy 4.8 because thats his lowest score right well if it was an average score he'd then recieve an 5.6 now shoot me if thats not a better score and sommit i'd like to see instead of a 4.8 woulldn't you. lowest score dosen't mean that the overall system isn't reasonably fast just that one component isn't quite as fast as another so i dont realy put much stock in this form of benchmark because it leaves out the fact of overall performance :uberhump: but i get a 4.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

see sig :p

What CPU do you have? Is it overclocked?

Here is mine:

vistascorejs1.jpg

Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 L638F615 @ 3.4GHz (8 x 425 1.46875V)

Zalman CNPS9700 LED Heatsink

ASUS P5N32-E SLI Plus - Bios 0801

2 x 1GB Corsair XMS2 PC6400 TWIN2X2048-6400

PNY nVidia GeForce 8800GTS 320MB

Western Digital Raptor WD740ADFD 74GB 16MB SATA HDD

Hitachi Deskstar 7K250 - 120GB 8MB SATA HDD

Maxtor MaXLine III 7L300S0 - 300GB 16MB SATA HDD

NEC 16X DVD-RW Drive / JLMS 8X DVD-ROM Drive

Antec TruePower Trio 650W Power Supply

Antec Nine Hundred Case

Windows Vista - Windows XP Pro

Does anyone know if there is some artificial limitation to prevent people from getting a 5.9 Calculations Per Second score without a Quad-Core CPU? No matter how high I clock my E6600, I can't get above a 5.7 rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6300

RAM: 512MB DDR2-667*2

HDD: Seagate 7200.9160GB SATA

Motherboard: Intel DP965LT

Graphic Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7300GT (256M GDDR3)

post-233238-1185415743.png

Is this OK?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

performanceindexxn0.jpg

I pwn.....

Managed to get cpu overlocked to 2.9 something ghz but I cant do it more for some reason......

Pretty intrestering thread.

My computer Epeen is 5.7" :cool: :laugh: :p :shiftyninja:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:hump: typical of M$ to lazy to write an subroutine to give an average of the scores made they just said stuff it give them a score of the lowest component and that'll do now see sidvicious up there gets a lousy 4.8 because thats his lowest score right well if it was an average score he'd then recieve an 5.6 now shoot me if thats not a better score and sommit i'd like to see instead of a 4.8 woulldn't you. lowest score dosen't mean that the overall system isn't reasonably fast just that one component isn't quite as fast as another so i dont realy put much stock in this form of benchmark because it leaves out the fact of overall performance :uberhump: but i get a 4.5

Bottle. Neck. Bottleneck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-34298-1185657383.jpg

My New Computer! I'm going to be upgrading to 2 gigs of ram in a week so hopefully that'll bring it to a 5.0 at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How come an AMD dual core 4000 goes faster than my 4400???

( edit ) Must be because you are on x64 or overclocked

Yeah a 4400 runs at 2.3 and i'm at 2.625. There really isn't any difference between the 4000 and 4400 except stock clock speed so there really wasn't any point in my spending the extra $20 on a 4400.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.