Your Windows Experience Index rating!


 Share

Recommended Posts

Davie
mine, cpu @ 3.0ghz

Nice editing there mate :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

DreadBoat89

3.1 because of Intel GMA950

Link to post
Share on other sites

Swift_Monkey

Mine.

post-35159-1178958844_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

SojIrOu

My processor's holding me back cause i haven't overclocked it yet. :shifty: And please don't ask me why i need so much hdd space.

WEI.jpg

Edited by SojIrOu
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mayhem
Here is my weak score...

Are you overclocking your ram? Quite high number there. I am using corsair dominator pc-8500 stock with no oc.

Nice editing there mate :p

yes the memory are overclock and the disk is 2 maxtor sata 2 160gb @ raid and no, the score is not faked lol

4map1j7.jpg62r411h.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

PsicBoy

Hey Guys

I'm just a newbie to this forum - but we running vista on a MAC G5 and get a rating of 5.6, just wanted to share a twist in the tail.

Edited by PsicBoy
Link to post
Share on other sites

bdsams
Hey Guys

I'm just a newbie to this forum - but we running vista on a MAC G5 and get a rating of 5.6, just wanted to share a twist in the tail.

you cant run vista on a G5, thats a PPC...nice try

you have just earned a ninja cat:

post-27165-1178029473.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

+mrbester

4.8 (CPU drags it down, all others are 5.9), which isn't bad for a stock Zoostorm (cost less when I bought it :punk:).

CPU: Core 2 Duo E6300 on non o/c-able mobo (should really upgrade it)

Edited by mrbester
Link to post
Share on other sites

deck

So I just got Vista up and running. I'm pleased. I'm pleased with my score too... but I still find the memory rating funny.

post-365-1179367020_thumb.jpg

post-365-1179367027_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

deck

Just a quick addition to my last post; How is it that I have more memory than other people but get a lower score? And, conversely, I have less HD space but get a higher score?

post-365-1179410236_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tamilboy86
Just a quick addition to my last post; How is it that I have more memory than other people but get a lower score? And, conversely, I have less HD space but get a higher score?

I think its because u need Vista 64bit or Xp 64bit before u can use 4GB...

Link to post
Share on other sites

eSouL

My cheapskate E4300 and Kingston ValueRAMs..

post-9880-1179418100.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

lawtai

I'll have to double check but I believe mine was 5.1 with my Athlon 64bit processor being the low score.

Link to post
Share on other sites

J400uk
3.1 because of Intel GMA950

Thats pretty good for a gma950, I built up a system for a mate recently with this chipset and it only scored 2 lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

britzban

Base score 4.6

Processor 4.8

Memory (RAM) 4.6

Graphics 5.9

Gaming graphics 4.9

Primary hard disk 5.4

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robbobloke

experienceindexwu0.jpg

-Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 "LGA775 Conroe" 2.40GHz (@3.2GHz)

-Gigabyte GA_965P_DS3P

-Crucial Ballistix 2GB DDR2 PC2-5300C3

Link to post
Share on other sites

stockwiz

processor is the bottleneck .. the rest are 5.9

post-1712-1179665664_thumb.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

cwhast

This is my new Dell rig

post-105894-1179667940.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

kampioen

so i saw someone got 5.9.. is that the highest? whoever had 5.9 had put a shitload of money into his system.. don't see the point :s i think this guy here with a 4.2 has a good enough system...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fothsn
ratingun2.jpg
Link to post
Share on other sites

ManMountain
capturegi8.th.jpg Edited by ManMountain
Link to post
Share on other sites

TranceSphere

Mine:

post-15838-1179678312_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

stockwiz
so i saw someone got 5.9.. is that the highest? whoever had 5.9 had put a shitload of money into his system.. don't see the point :s i think this guy here with a 4.2 has a good enough system...

not really..... simply being able to get that core 2 duo clocked up a few hundred more MHZ would be enough to get the 5.9.. you could actually build a fairly inexpensive system and get it to score 5.9 assuming you can get that core 2 duo up there to 3.6 GHZ.. mine doesn't go that high.

Ram is cheap these days... 2 gigs of G.SKILL HZ is only around $130.. core 2 duos are below $250.. and an 8800 GTS 320MB is under $300... throw in a decent motherboard and a cheap seagate 7200.10 and you could hit 5.9 at a relatively low price.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaax

Here is mine:

Pc info:

Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Edition QX6700 @ 2.66Ghz

Gigabyte 965P-DQ6

4GB Ram Corsair

ATI Radeon X1950 Series

HDD

WD Raptor 74GB @10K rpm

Maxtor SATA2 250 GB

post-231198-1182726939_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

ShelbyGT350

Mine was 2.9 when i had vista :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.