Your Windows Experience Index rating!

[Davie 0]

mine, cpu @ 3.0ghz

Nice editing there mate :p

[DreadBoat89 0]

3.1 because of Intel GMA950

[Swift_Monkey 0]

Mine.

[SojIrOu 4]

My processor's holding me back cause i haven't overclocked it yet. :shifty: And please don't ask me why i need so much hdd space.

Edited May 12, 2007 by SojIrOu

[Mayhem 8]

Here is my weak score...

Are you overclocking your ram? Quite high number there. I am using corsair dominator pc-8500 stock with no oc.

Nice editing there mate :p

yes the memory are overclock and the disk is 2 maxtor sata 2 160gb @ raid and no, the score is not faked lol

[PsicBoy 0]

Hey Guys

I'm just a newbie to this forum - but we running vista on a MAC G5 and get a rating of 5.6, just wanted to share a twist in the tail.

Edited May 16, 2007 by PsicBoy

[bdsams 365]

Hey Guys

I'm just a newbie to this forum - but we running vista on a MAC G5 and get a rating of 5.6, just wanted to share a twist in the tail.

you cant run vista on a G5, thats a PPC...nice try

you have just earned a ninja cat:

[+mrbester 192]

4.8 (CPU drags it down, all others are 5.9), which isn't bad for a stock Zoostorm (cost less when I bought it :punk:).

CPU: Core 2 Duo E6300 on non o/c-able mobo (should really upgrade it)

Edited May 16, 2007 by mrbester

[deck 34]

So I just got Vista up and running. I'm pleased. I'm pleased with my score too... but I still find the memory rating funny.

[deck 34]

Just a quick addition to my last post; How is it that I have more memory than other people but get a lower score? And, conversely, I have less HD space but get a higher score?

[Tamilboy86 15]

Just a quick addition to my last post; How is it that I have more memory than other people but get a lower score? And, conversely, I have less HD space but get a higher score?

I think its because u need Vista 64bit or Xp 64bit before u can use 4GB...

[eSouL 0]

My cheapskate E4300 and Kingston ValueRAMs..

[lawtai 3]

I'll have to double check but I believe mine was 5.1 with my Athlon 64bit processor being the low score.

[J400uk 1]

3.1 because of Intel GMA950

Thats pretty good for a gma950, I built up a system for a mate recently with this chipset and it only scored 2 lol.

[britzban 1]

Base score 4.6

Processor 4.8

Memory (RAM) 4.6

Graphics 5.9

Gaming graphics 4.9

Primary hard disk 5.4

[Robbobloke 0]

-Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 "LGA775 Conroe" 2.40GHz (@3.2GHz)

-Gigabyte GA_965P_DS3P

-Crucial Ballistix 2GB DDR2 PC2-5300C3

[stockwiz 7]

processor is the bottleneck .. the rest are 5.9

[cwhast 1]

This is my new Dell rig

[kampioen 0]

so i saw someone got 5.9.. is that the highest? whoever had 5.9 had put a shitload of money into his system.. don't see the point :s i think this guy here with a 4.2 has a good enough system...

[Fothsn 0]

[ManMountain 56]

Edited May 20, 2007 by ManMountain

[TranceSphere 0]

Mine:

[stockwiz 7]

so i saw someone got 5.9.. is that the highest? whoever had 5.9 had put a shitload of money into his system.. don't see the point :s i think this guy here with a 4.2 has a good enough system...

not really..... simply being able to get that core 2 duo clocked up a few hundred more MHZ would be enough to get the 5.9.. you could actually build a fairly inexpensive system and get it to score 5.9 assuming you can get that core 2 duo up there to 3.6 GHZ.. mine doesn't go that high.

Ram is cheap these days... 2 gigs of G.SKILL HZ is only around $130.. core 2 duos are below $250.. and an 8800 GTS 320MB is under $300... throw in a decent motherboard and a cheap seagate 7200.10 and you could hit 5.9 at a relatively low price.

[Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaax 0]

Here is mine:

Pc info:

Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Edition QX6700 @ 2.66Ghz

Gigabyte 965P-DQ6

4GB Ram Corsair

ATI Radeon X1950 Series

HDD

WD Raptor 74GB @10K rpm

Maxtor SATA2 250 GB

[ShelbyGT350 0]

Mine was 2.9 when i had vista :p