SVG Veteran Posted August 2, 2008 Veteran Share Posted August 2, 2008 Here's mine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3i89g Posted August 2, 2008 Share Posted August 2, 2008 Mine's a 2.6, but it's a notebook. If it weren't for the graphics, it'd be a 4.8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alisalem Posted August 2, 2008 Share Posted August 2, 2008 5.7 here. All 5.9 except HDD @ 5.7 of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1759 Posted August 2, 2008 Share Posted August 2, 2008 4.8; not bad for an AGP system (A64 X2 3800+ and a HD 2600 Pro). Laptop gets a 3.0, Radeon X1200 and Turion X2 TL-56. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleSpellbinder Posted August 7, 2008 Share Posted August 7, 2008 (edited) Finally got a new computer. Thrilled with the results! Edited August 7, 2008 by UncleSpellbinder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaidgs Posted August 7, 2008 Share Posted August 7, 2008 Thats my new computer. I hoped to get a 5.9, but unluckily I got 5.5. The RAM is holding me back. I got 8GB RAM, but apparently the chip specifications weren't enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DR3AMxCATCHER Posted August 7, 2008 Share Posted August 7, 2008 3.0. Graphics card is the problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason S. Global Moderator Posted August 7, 2008 Global Moderator Share Posted August 7, 2008 5.9 :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alisalem Posted August 7, 2008 Share Posted August 7, 2008 Thats my new computer. I hoped to get a 5.9, but unluckily I got 5.5. The RAM is holding me back. I got 8GB RAM, but apparently the chip specifications weren't enough. This happened to me. You need to run them in the closest ratio with your CPU frequency or tighten the timings. For instance, my 8GB OCZ Ram gives 5.8 @ the recommended config. (4-4-4-15/2T-2.0v). I got 5.9 by using 4-4-4-12/2T-2.1v. Also back when I was overclocking my CPU, the DRAM was 1:1 with the CPU Freq. (400). It gave 5.9 @ low timings (5-5-5-15/18). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soldier1st Posted August 8, 2008 Share Posted August 8, 2008 cpu is 3.8(athlon 64 3000+) memory is 3.4(it was 4.6 with 2GB ddr1 but after going to 3GB it went down) graphics is 5.9(geforce 8600GT 256MB and gaming graphics is 5.6 and the hdd is 5.5(1st hdd is 200GB sata 1 and 2nd hdd is an 80GB pata) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunkenMaster Posted August 8, 2008 Share Posted August 8, 2008 Do these numbers really have any relevance to how Windows performs? I'm running my desktop at fair high res and I'm running Aero. It rates the card as a 1.0 (its the only 3650 AGP card and its not an ATI official release). I'm playing most modern games on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViperAFK Posted August 8, 2008 Share Posted August 8, 2008 Do these numbers really have any relevance to how Windows performs? I'm running my desktop at fair high res and I'm running Aero. It rates the card as a 1.0 (its the only 3650 AGP card and its not an ATI official release). I'm playing most modern games on it. that rating is messed up, 3650 should get much higher than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srugie Veteran Posted August 8, 2008 Veteran Share Posted August 8, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbfc_uk Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Thought I'd update my rating as i've just got a new laptop. Its a Dell Inspiron 1525 T5750 Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2Ghz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaidgs Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 This happened to me. You need to run them in the closest ratio with your CPU frequency or tighten the timings.For instance, my 8GB OCZ Ram gives 5.8 @ the recommended config. (4-4-4-15/2T-2.0v). I got 5.9 by using 4-4-4-12/2T-2.1v. Also back when I was overclocking my CPU, the DRAM was 1:1 with the CPU Freq. (400). It gave 5.9 @ low timings (5-5-5-15/18). Can I change the timings without buying new RAM chips?! If so how?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xerxes Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 I was 5.5 on Vista Ultimate 32-bit but when I "upgraded" to 64-bit it went down to 5.4...why is that anyway? (same happened with my old machine when I upgraded to 64-bit Vista, went down 1 point) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chsoriano Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 I just built a new computer about 3 weeks ago, after some problems, it's been great now. I wasn't going for a 5.9 specifically but I was pretty excited when I saw it. I kind of want to get another HD4870 though, or replace my HD4870 with a 4870x2 to see if I can't play Crysis on maximum... It runs very good on High/Very High now but I want to see better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alisalem Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Can I change the timings without buying new RAM chips?! If so how?! Yes definitely through the BIOS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niels. Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Running a solid 5.9 here on my desktop after my HDD upgrade last week :). My laptop is running a 4.1 score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olemus Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Damn hard drive :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluezz Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Do these numbers really have any relevance to how Windows performs? I'm running my desktop at fair high res and I'm running Aero. It rates the card as a 1.0 (its the only 3650 AGP card and its not an ATI official release). I'm playing most modern games on it. Pretty sure Vista is giving your ATI 3650 a "1.0" because you dont have the drivers installed correctly. Get the latest ATI drivers from http://ati.amd.com/support/driver.html After successful install of the drivers, do "update my score" in Windows Experience Index. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Topham Hatt Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 I'm happy :) The first time I ran it right after installing Windows it was 1.0 :p I guess 5.9 is the highest anyone has ever got it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Here's mine! Memory speed is 800mhz and can be higher...I didn't want to spend the extra money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Majesticmerc MVC Posted August 10, 2008 MVC Share Posted August 10, 2008 5.9s all round :). I wish Microsoft would update the indexing system so that I can find out what my score really is. I know it's 5.9 or above, but I want to know how far above! Also, my hard disk is partitioned wrong, hence the funky hard disk size of 436GB, it's actually a half-terabyte drive, but I've got some unallocated space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tantawi Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Some minor changes since last year, so I thought I'd post again, still 5.9 though. Specs: - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (B3) @ 3.06GHz w/Scythe SCNJ-1100P HSF. - 4GB SuperTalent T800UX2GC4 DDR2-800 @ 850MHz 4-4-4-12 2.1V - GIGABYTE GV-NX88T512HP NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB @ 720MHz/1728MHz/1900MHz. History: Aug 24 2007 - 5.9 Jul 16 2007 - 5.3 Mar 20 2007 - 4.6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts