Neowin Fantasy Baseball Season 2007


Recommended Posts

Yeah, I got a bit lucky there lol. Then again, Mussina broke down again and Jones' closer status is in question. We both got a lot of question marks out of that trade.

Now it seems that Harden will be down for quite a while so I've pulled the plug on him.

I now need Carlos Zambrano to stay hot to make the deal worthwhile. The irony is that I was mostly interested in Rich Harden and I was taking Zambrano only as a wildcard.

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm interested in moving Cincinnati closer David Weathers for a non-closer but this is exclusively based on the idea that Octavio Dotel will be traded and J. Soria will become the closer in K.C. If that doesn't happen then I'll probably regret any moves that I do make.

Edit: I may need to make another 2 for 1 trade. I have all three of my disabled guys coming off the DL sometime this week and I will again have roster space issues.

I'm thinking that Adamb10 is pretty happy that Gallardo was left inactive on the bench today.

Y. Gallardo (L, 4-2) IP:2.2 H:12 R:11 ER:11 BB:3 K:1 HR:2

Anytime that you give up more home runs than you get in strikeouts isn't going to be a good night.

I just noticed that Fred is doing what Virtual Madden did last year to be champ. That is, Fred adds/drops pitchers every other day so he can add up the number of wins and K's to win. Just this week, he added and dropped 7 pitchers and they tend to be the same ones, such as Bannister from KC and Kason Gabbard.

Ironically, I still beat him in every pitching category besides SV's even after he added and dropped 7 SP's.

I just noticed that Fred is doing what Virtual Madden did last year to be champ. That is, Fred adds/drops pitchers every other day so he can add up the number of wins and K's to win. Just this week, he added and dropped 7 pitchers and they tend to be the same ones, such as Bannister from KC and Kason Gabbard.

Ironically, I still beat him in every pitching category besides SV's even after he added and dropped 7 SP's.

Yeah, it didn't work. I probably would have done better by sticking to my core starters. I also lost Garza to someone else.

I still find that as a cheap way to try to win. Not saying you are being a cheater, but its not something many people do. You stick to your team and add/drop as you seem fit, not add/drop every day to accumulate stats to win.

I still find that as a cheap way to try to win. Not saying you are being a cheater, but its not something many people do. You stick to your team and add/drop as you seem fit, not add/drop every day to accumulate stats to win.

Well, as I see it, we're supposed to be managers which means getting the last drop out of our roster as possible. It isn't an inherently superior approach, you risk losing players that you have interest in since you need to dangle them on the waiver wire. Starting a lot of mediocre players is no guarantee for success. For example, I picked up Randy Winn for one day because he had a doubleheader on Monday and he rewarded me by going 0 for 8.

If you wanted to limit it next year then we could consider adding one day to the waiver wait time. I personally think that it adds some fun. I'm okay with exploiting any loophole that we all have access to. For example, if you have a SP on the disabled list, you can activate him from the DL right up until the game actually starts. As soon as it does start you can place him back on the DL and pick up another player for the next few days. While that may seem like cheating, Yahoo allows it. I've never actually had the opportunity to do that but I wouldn't have problems with doing so (or someone else doing it against me). It's a quirk but it's a legal quirk.

  • 3 weeks later...

*1.		 	Fred'sDiamondDragons	  146-77-19	  .643	  -	  9-2-0	  7	  87
*2. 		  Mumble's Minions 	138-88-16 	.603 	9.5 	9-2-0 	3 	9
*3. 		  Dead Man's Party 	126-101-15 	.552 	22 	3-7-1 	10 	34
*4. 		  Cubs_In_2007 	127-102-13 	.552 	22 	2-9-0 	2 	5
*5. 		  Mr. Franchise 	123-105-14 	.537 	25.5 	8-3-0 	11 	49
*6. 		  lawtai 	116-111-15 	.510 	32 	6-5-0 	5 	11

There was a tie for 3rd place. I would have thought that the team with more wins would have got the higher spot but apparently not.

Edit:

If, at the end of the regular season, two or more players in a Head-to-Head League finish tied in the standings (based on a Games Behind calculation), the following system will be used to break the tie and determine playoff seedings:

1. Overall winning percentage.

2. Highest winning percentage in Week 22.

Edited by Fred Derf
I found the reason
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I assume that people aren't really trying to win anymore? I was losing earlier in the week but I have made countless moves to squeak whatever extra stats I can out of my team. Nobody else seemed to alter their squad for Monday, for example. Nobody has attempted to go after the guys that I have dropped.

Perhaps everyone is busy with school. At lot of my leads are currently only 1, 2 or 3 points so I'm still going to try to lock down a few more categories.

The 7th place game is going to go down to a final few key stats.

Runs, Hits and HR are only separated by 1 to 3 points each. The score is currently 6-5 for bangbang023.

Today is the last day of Neowin Baseball 2007.

The 7th place game is going to go down to a final few key stats.

Runs, Hits and HR are only separated by 1 to 3 points each. The score is currently 6-5 for bangbang023.

Today is the last day of Neowin Baseball 2007.

I thought I was out of it for a while. Basically, I'm taking the batting and l3thal is taking the pitching.

I thought I was out of it for a while. Basically, I'm taking the batting and l3thal is taking the pitching.

Except that your group of lahrd-asses are losing the SB race 11 to 1. :p

p.s. cough, Matt Stairs, cough (sorry L3thal).

Oh well, haha. I didn't get into fantasy baseball as much as last year. Last year I had a ton of time to tweak my fantasy rosters, this year it's been a chore. Too much time devoted to Xbox 360, school, work, and relationships I guess. Good job everyone, I don't know if I'll sign up for fantasy baseball next season so it's been fun. (You bet I'll still try and kick some butt in basketball and football though)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!