|OFFICIAL| Halo 3 Beta Blowout


Recommended Posts

Really? From what I can remember, Halo 1 and Halo 2 multiplayer graphics are pretty much equivalent to single player.

Halo2's graphics "scale down" as you increase number of players in split screen. At last in Foundation. :p Not sure if Halo had anything similar.

Really? From what I can remember, Halo 1 and Halo 2 multiplayer graphics are pretty much equivalent to single player.

Pretty sure Frankie has said the opposite before. But even then, I've always remembered the much larger worlds and environments that the SP has over MP. It seems a lot more refined.

Actually, one of the other Bungie guys says it himself in the IGN video interview.

Halo2's graphics "scale down" as you increase number of players in split screen. At last in Foundation. :p Not sure if Halo had anything similar.

Wow, really? I guess I never really noticed that. ;)

Pretty sure Frankie has said the opposite before. But even then, I've always remembered the much larger worlds and environments that the SP has over MP. It seems a lot more refined.

Actually, one of the other Bungie guys says it himself in the IGN video interview.

Well, right, SP has much larger maps, greater drawing distances, etc etc and that is to be expected, but I never really noticed the textures or anything else being scaled down in MP. Also, one of the main points that Bungie made (when talking about the MP) is that the drawing distances are so much greater in Halo 3 than in Halo 1 or 2, so I don't know how much different the SP graphics will be. But here's hoping that they're even better than the MP! :D (Y)

Wow, really? I guess I never really noticed that. ;)

An easy example of them toning extra stuff down is to take the plasma pistol in an MP game and charge it up. In SP there's a charge meter that fills up. In MP, it doesn't do that. It's small, but the little things can make a difference.

Giga's right. They have stated that they do tone some things down to reduce lag and such over XBL.

-Spenser

Please do tell.

I want to give me take from just seeing the videos and watching live streams of it. Halo 3 looks like Halo 2 (gameplay) with a much more user advanced equipment. You have your shield grenade which will make you easier or harder to kill, depending if you know how to use it well enough. You have your grav lift which is going to make a difference, easier to get out of combat and get into hidden areas. I would say if I had to say it's closer to is like Halo 2 with improvements.

Thats my 2 cents from watching videos.

Halo 3 seems to have a different style of game play from Halo 2. Halo 2 focused on dual wields, small indoor environments, and power weapons.

In Halo 3, the weapons are very balanced. The AR start is a great move. Every weapon is great (and I really mean that, needler is amazing at close range, brute and carbine are very improved as well, plasma pistol homing is toned down, etc.). Nades have a little less of a radius, so it takes more skill than luck. Halo 3 has open maps. It's easier to take down shields in 3, so cover and strategic positioning is vital (something sorely missing from halo2).

Overall, I think they made some vast improvements in game play. The main thing, IMO, is map design. Valhalla may be the best Halo map I've played.

So while there was a big transition from Halo 1 to Halo 2 in terms of dual wielding, smaller battlefields, etc- the transition from 2 to 3 is more about straight up skill, flanking, stealth, and outmaneuvering. In that sense, it is more like Halo 1. The strategies you'll need to use the equipment, the new weapons, and the new maps aren't from either game. I suggest forgetting halo 1 and 2, as halo 3 is a new style of game.

Oh yeah, the real life battlefield sounds are amazing. You can hear explosions and gunfire from the otherside of the map. You can tell Bungie focused on the details with this one. Matchmaking has a ton of improvements. You can veto the given map/game. You can select to party up with your team after the game. The new Ranks/levels are a little confusing at first, but it's cool. The recording feature is dumbed down for the beta, but it's gonna be amazing with tons of potential.

PS. Spartan Laser is freaking fun!

Halo 3 seems to have a different style of game play from Halo 2. Halo 2 focused on dual wields, small indoor environments, and power weapons.

In Halo 3, the weapons are very balanced. The AR start is a great move. Every weapon is great (and I really mean that, needler is amazing at close range, brute and carbine are very improved as well, plasma pistol homing is toned down, etc.). Nades have a little less of a radius, so it takes more skill than luck. Halo 3 has open maps. It's easier to take down shields in 3, so cover and strategic positioning is vital (something sorely missing from halo2).

Overall, I think they made some vast improvements in game play. The main thing, IMO, is map design. Valhalla may be the best Halo map I've played.

So while there was a big transition from Halo 1 to Halo 2 in terms of dual wielding, smaller battlefields, etc- the transition from 2 to 3 is more about straight up skill, flanking, stealth, and outmaneuvering. In that sense, it is more like Halo 1. The strategies you'll need to use the equipment, the new weapons, and the new maps aren't from either game. I suggest forgetting halo 1 and 2, as halo 3 is a new style of game.

Oh yeah, the real life battlefield sounds are amazing. You can hear explosions and gunfire from the otherside of the map. You can tell Bungie focused on the details with this one. Matchmaking has a ton of improvements. You can veto the given map/game. You can select to party up with your team after the game. The new Ranks/levels are a little confusing at first, but it's cool. The recording feature is dumbed down for the beta, but it's gonna be amazing with tons of potential.

PS. Spartan Laser is freaking fun!

Just to back this up, this is along the lines of what I've heard from a lot of other reviews done by people and not websites. From what I see in the videos, it just looks like a different game while keeping the halo look, and it looks like a ton of fun.

-Spenser

Halo 3 seems to have a different style of game play from Halo 2. Halo 2 focused on dual wields, small indoor environments, and power

So while there was a big transition from Halo 1 to Halo 2 in terms of dual wielding, smaller battlefields, etc- the transition from 2 to 3 is more about straight up skill, flanking, stealth, and outmaneuvering. In that sense, it is more like Halo 1. The strategies you'll need to use the equipment, the new weapons, and the new maps aren't from either game. I suggest forgetting halo 1 and 2, as halo 3 is a new style of game.

Forgive me for prying you for more information.

Does the game play as far as the feel of the game, the engine, physics seem more inline with H2 or H1? H1 had a very heavy slow feel to the game where H2 felt more whimsical and extremely light. The term "balance" seems to have been thrown out allot, with some reviews saying that things feel more like H1, not in terms of strategy in game play, but the over all gaming experience.

I'm way to anxious on this :p

You can jump high and not have fall damage in Halo 3. Melee range is a lot shorter (realistic), stickable nades dont fly as far (frags still can get some air). I'm not sure if this is what you meant. One thing that is nice is if you die in water, your body floats down the river. If you die on an icy hill, it will slide down it. Also, when you melee people, their bodies fly and can be thrown back almost 20 feet on ice. I think that is pretty fun.

Unfortunately you can't play a local game. You can only do match making.

As for Skirmish, there have been some interesting changes. Territories is now turn based. One is defending them, other is grabbing them. Once you get a territory, you can't lose it. Each team gets two turns on offense. Most territories taken wins. I really really like the change.

VIP is pretty fun when everyone knows whats going on. It's basically team jug, where one member on your team has overshield and is the VIP. You only get points when you kill him/her.

I have yet to play any flag game, as I've played slayer mostly.

As for Skirmish, there have been some interesting changes. Territories is now turn based. One is defending them, other is grabbing them. Once you get a territory, you can't lose it. Each team gets two turns on offense. Most territories taken wins. I really really like the change.

Wow, that sounds pretty fun.

Have you tried using the plasma pistol to stall vehicles at all? I saw it on a video and it seems like it could be fairly useful for stopping ghosts that are trying to run you down or maybe to get close to a tank to commandeer it.

Time seems to be creeping by now that we're within 24 hours of the public release. Oh yeah, for those of you who got in through the rule of three, has anyone received an email with their download key or anything? I'm guessing they won't give those out until tomorrow.

Plasma Pistol, Carbine, and Plasma Rifle are all pretty good when it comes to stopping vehicles. Nades are pretty good at tippng them (like Halo 1). Watch out though, because the warthog is a lot tougher to stop in 3, and rightfully so. They were death traps in halo 2.

Forgot to add, you can assassinate people off mongooses (mongeese?), so when they're slow and close by you, wack away.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!