[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

lol sure you can take that as an excuse but deep down you know the robot thing was just an easy way out lol

It's convenient, but at least it's somewhat plausible. Once you've put yourself in the position of explaining how the Doctor didn't die even though you've kinda just seen him die, you've not got a lot of choices. You can just go bat-sh** stupid like RTD, or try and put together something reasonably thought out and pre-determined. Plus, it gels somewhat with the Doctor's character, emphasising his generally crafty and underhandedness.

It also puts Moffat in a nice position next series where he doesn't have to put in some epic "everyone wants to kill the Doctor" storyline / finalie because everyone already thinks he's dead. He's put himself in a position where storyline dictates he can go for subtler and smarter writing. Not that any of us would have particularly questioned it either way, but he's written himself into that nice position, and hopefully maybe quite a few low key laid back episodes next season where we get to explore the Doctor's past.

Still, hopefully we get find out what caused the Tardis to explode next season... I assume the Silence are replacing the Daleks as the Doctor's main enemies for time being soo I'm hoping there'll be more exposition on that. That, and why there were no ducks in the duck pond -.- I'm still hung up on that! :p

I wouldnt be a 'fan' if i stopped watching the crap episodes, i have all of the 'nu' series on dvd and blurays.

I forgot if you arent riding Moffats **** then you arent allowed an opinion. I knew it was going to be some ridiculous Deus Ex Machina twist Moffat likes to do that. Hopefully he will get the message that his stories are crap and he will stop whining on twitter that people are abusing him and he will jog on.

No, you're allowed to have an opinion. From the very first episode of the series, we knew the Doctor was going to somehow escape (or copout) his fixed point in time death. There's going to be a Christmas Special, and a 7th series. If the Doctor did die, then how would the series continue on? It would just end here. I'm just glad it wasn't some over the top, RTD style "copout".

You think people from a timeline of timetravelling space cops that can miniaturize entire squadrons of themselves at will into midgit people that control perfect robot replicas of various historical figures don't have the technology or the know-how to put on a tiny light show? :p

This is great. I saw a topic on another forum asking how the Teselecta were able to regenerate. The responses ranged from lazy writing, The Doctor soniced the Teselecta to do so, or that he transfered some of River's regeneration powers to it. I, along with others were thinking something in line with your reply. I mean, duh!

And the send off for the Brigadier was so brilliant.

It wasn't a cop-out.

The only thing the Doctor needed to do is avoid a paradox, and the only thing necessary to do that was fool other people to think that he died. Think about it --- the Doctor just needed to make sure all of the events that happened after his death continued to happen ; and they would have happened just the same if it had only appeared like he died.

He fulfilled every requirement that was necessary for him to escape the situation. Also, the Doctor did die in the first timeline; he just didn't in the second. It was a fixed point in time, but that only means some things couldn't change about that moment, it doesn't mean that nothing could change.

I really liked the episode for its quality (great effects throughout), although overall I think it missed the mark. It was a fun episode but it was definitely rushed at places, and really, the ending was fairly predictable from the first episode.

But, overall, it's still better than the finales we have from RTD's era. It's not up to what I expect from Moffat, but it does set a nice tone for the series beyond, so let's see what will happen then.

Doctor Who? I was kinda expecting that, but I didn't want them to say it.

Feel let down again, I thought it was generally a poor episode, definitely the worst season finale out of the 6 seasons.

The final question - Dr Who? I almost don't want that answered by the current writers as they will take such a deep part of Dr Who and ruin it with their story telling.

Well we know that River does learn his name eventually. So that will have to be answered, or it's going to be one of them things that the characters know besides the audience. We still don't know why the TARDIS exploded

Well here's to Season 7, hopefully the Christmas special is better this year, last years was terrible if I seem to recall.

It wasn't a cop-out.

The only thing the Doctor needed to do is avoid a paradox, and the only thing necessary to do that was fool other people to think that he died. Think about it --- the Doctor just needed to make sure all of the events that happened after his death continued to happen ; and they would have happened just the same if it had only appeared like he died.

He fulfilled every requirement that was necessary for him to escape the situation. Also, the Doctor did die in the first timeline; he just didn't in the second. It was a fixed point in time, but that only means some things couldn't change about that moment, it doesn't mean that nothing could change.

Exactly, I agree pretty much fully. The fixed point in time was the "Doctor" being by the lake on that date getting shot and dying. It was one huge paradox from the start, hence the blue envelopes he sent to himself and the rest. As long as the above bit is met then time can go on fine, it was and we're done, on to the holiday ep and next season. Hardly a cop-out OR a Deus ex machina event. Also the question being the title of the show fits, it's the question everyone asks, everyone wants to know as well. Also, there's no need to even answering it. Knowing what the question is now doesn't mean they even have to give us the answer, they probably never will.

Well we know that River does learn his name eventually. So that will have to be answered, or it's going to be one of them things that the characters know besides the audience. We still don't know why the TARDIS exploded

We should never learn his name; that would ruin the show.

River knows his name but the only person she ever tells is his younger self before she dies.

Exactly, I agree pretty much fully. The fixed point in time was the "Doctor" being by the lake on that date getting shot and dying. It was one huge paradox from the start, hence the blue envelopes he sent to himself and the rest. As long as the above bit is met then time can go on fine, it was and we're done, on to the holiday ep and next season. Hardly a cop-out OR a Deus ex machina event. Also the question being the title of the show fits, it's the question everyone asks, everyone wants to know as well. Also, there's no need to even answering it. Knowing what the question is now doesn't mean they even have to give us the answer, they probably never will.

Agreed! His way out wasn't created right on the spot. The whole theme (I guess you can call it that) for this series was two events or things co-existing in the same space and or time.

- The TARDIS and her crew inside the TARDIS from a few moments earlier in Space and Time.

- The Alien space ship and the pirate ship in The Curse of the Black Spot.

- The whole Ganger thing.

- The Telsectra taking on the form of someone while having a miniaturized version of them inside.

- Two Amys in The Girl Who Waited.

Just noticed this... I was rewatching Matt Smith's first episode, Series 5, #1...

USQ7wl.jpg

Either someone got their dates messed up, or there really IS more to Rory than I imagined... I mean, some on-- not only did he immediately recognize the Doctor, but wasn't surprised by the TARDIS's interior. He has also died SEVERAL times, and come back from each one.

If we look at Rory's ID... and compare it with the date of the episode's occurences... This must put Rory at around 40 years old. At least. WHO ARE YOU, RORY?!

Just noticed this... I was rewatching Matt Smith's first episode, Series 5, #1...

USQ7wl.jpg

Either someone got their dates messed up, or there really IS more to Rory than I imagined... I mean, some on-- not only did he immediately recognize the Doctor, but wasn't surprised by the TARDIS's interior. He has also died SEVERAL times, and come back from each one.

If we look at Rory's ID... and compare it with the date of the episode's occurences... This must put Rory at around 40 years old. At least. WHO ARE YOU, RORY?!

After the events of "The Pandorica Opens" Rory is much older than the doctor now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Funny, but I didn't had the issue. All PC's at work are Dell and we had the culprit version of Support Assist for about 2 weeks until we got the new one. No problem at all. And for checking you can also use Dell Command Update, no need to search in windows settings. Just check the Upgrade History.
    • YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Apple are scared of their customers! They have built a brand over the years of "it just works out of the box", but that slows innovation. Samsung's master stroke was the Galaxy Ultra: "Let's cram everything into one handset, make it so stupid only real nerds will love it, some of the features will work, some won't, but the audience will have such a high tolerance they won't care". Apple has no such device and so they are constantly worrying these days about the fallout of creating a new experience that customers might not like. I know it is often cited the reason they don't build a touchscreen Mac Book is they don't want to cannibalise the the iPad market, but I think it's equally cold feet after the criticism Microsoft receive trying to make a touch compatible desktop OS
    • HandBrake 1.11.2 by Razvan Serea HandBrake is an open-source, GPL-licensed, multiplatform, multithreaded video transcoder, available for MacOS X, Linux and Windows. Handbrake can process most common multimedia files and any DVD or BluRay sources that do not contain any kind of copy protection. Here is a detailed breakdown of HandBrake’s features: Built-in Device Presets—Get started with HandBrake in seconds by choosing a profile optimized for your device, or choose a universal profile for standard or high quality conversions. Simple, easy, fast. For those that want more choice, tweak many basic and advanced options to improve your encodes. Supported Input Sources—Handbrake can process most common multimedia files and any DVD or Blu-ray sources that do not contain any kind of copy protection. Outputs: File Containers: .MP4(.M4V) and .MKV Video Encoders: H.265 (x265 and QuickSync), H.264(x264 and QuickSync), H.265 MPEG-4 and MPEG-2, VP8 and Theora Audio Encoders: AAC / HE-AAC, MP3, Flac, AC3, or Vorbis Audio Pass-thru: AC-3, E-AC3, DTS, DTS-HD, TrueHD, AAC and MP3 tracks Additional features: Title/ Chapter Selection Queue up Multiple Encodes Chapter Markers Subtitles (VobSub, Closed Captions CEA-608, SSA, SRT) Constant Quality or Average BitRate Video Encoding Support for VFR, CFR and VFR Video Filters—Deinterlacing, Decomb, Detelecine, Deblock, Grayscale, Cropping and Scaling Live Video Preview HandBrake 1.11.2 changelog: All platforms Video Fixed a crash that happened when doing a 2-pass lossless x265 encode Fixed a memory leak that happened when doing a 2-pass MPEG-4/MPEG-2/VP9/FFV1 encode Audio Updated the list of supported dithers and encoders combinations Fixed the Core Audio AAC encoder 7.1 channel layout Subtitles Fixed the VobSub palette creation in the MP4 container Build system Improved build system compatibility with older build tools Third-party libraries FFmpeg 8.0.2 (decoding and filters) SVT-AV1 4.1.0 (AV1 video encoding) Linux Added WebM MIME type to the list of the supported formats Mac Improved handling of unsupported presets Updated Sparkle automatic update library Windows Improved handling of unsupported presets Improved queue low space pause behaviour Fixed the automatic audio track name generation Fixed the summary description of HDR video Download: HandBrake 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~30.0 (Open Source) Download: HandBrake ARM64 | Portable Links: HandBrake Website | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • So, an article that has nothing to do with Windows 11, still gets Windows 11 in the title and a build number as the picture? Dell have a buggy build of Support Assist HP have UEFI settings that need unlocking for the secureboot cert upgrade to take place.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      neufuse
      67
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!