Halo 03 |MP| OFFICIAL


Recommended Posts

Ya it's a bull**** system. Winning doubles constantly going positive 10+ in nearly ever win, mixing up weapons to use to kill and such, and I'm stuck at a 45 in Doubles. It's gotten to the point that I'm going to let my friend play my account while I play his so we can level. Since we don't play alike, the system will see us winning with new "skill" and rank us up. That's what people say works, we going to try.

Ya it's a bull**** system. Winning doubles constantly going positive 10+ in nearly ever win, mixing up weapons to use to kill and such, and I'm stuck at a 45 in Doubles. It's gotten to the point that I'm going to let my friend play my account while I play his so we can level. Since we don't play alike, the system will see us winning with new "skill" and rank us up. That's what people say works, we going to try.

Sorry if I sound like a jerk but I checked your games and you win only about half of your Team Doubles games. The games that you lost, you went negative. Also, to be honest, your kill/death ratio isn't up where most level 45-50s should be. The system also checks the headshots and that assault rifle isn't gonna get you many headshots.

I've won more than half of my games at in Doubles. Lately no, I haven't playing it seriously just going in to bull**** around and see what happens, hell I've let my brother play my doubles just to see what happens (win, lost, repeat). I'm tired of doubles so I'm not trying in that anymore. Doubt I'll try anymore. I should be 50, I've played 45+ with several 50's and beaten them all, they shouldn't be there (beaten as in got steaktacular's of them). The whole system is flawed, since you find kids at 50 who shouldn't and you find kids stuck at 30 who should be higher up. The system sucks, in general.

People need to learn how to play objective based matches. Just played a game of capture the flag where we got own because we only managed to touch their flag twice. People treat it like a slayer match instead of going for the actual objectives.

1. How am I supposed to know who it is? No one ever leaves a message explaining who the invite is from.

2. I try to only add people I know and talk to. It's nothing personal, but I'd have a crap load of friends, otherwise. When I play Halo, I only party up with my buddies from work or, sometimes, Netrack.

^^^Nice game!

I've been offline for a while (probably 2 weeks or so now) but I should be back on this weekend (it's been a hellish couple of weeks with schoolwork, but it's all good after this week) so if you guys aren't too busy playing other stuff, I'll be back on.

-Spenser

Man, Swords in Lone Wolves is ****ing terrible. Basically, every encounter is both swords negating each other while both people bash the trigger trying to get another strike in. It seems like my sword never resets as quickly as their's either so I'm always ****ed. Every other mode in Lone Wolves I handle fine, but this swords thing is a mess. It's all about smashing buttons instead of actually having any tactics.

Man, Swords in Lone Wolves is ****ing terrible. Basically, every encounter is both swords negating each other while both people bash the trigger trying to get another strike in. It seems like my sword never resets as quickly as their's either so I'm always ****ed. Every other mode in Lone Wolves I handle fine, but this swords thing is a mess. It's all about smashing buttons instead of actually having any tactics.

Hmm, that is definitely not the case, actually. There is a lot more tactics involved in a sword match than you might think, apparently. The key is, when you sword clash, instead of hitting the trigger again, hit Melee (if you are close enough) and you'll usually get the kill (which is probably why you're always losing those encounters). In addition, you have to pick and chose your encounters, bait people with grenades, sneak up on people, steal kills, etc. There is definitely more to it than you think.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!