- 0
Neowin's Top Hosts
Asked by
john smith 1924,
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Posts
-
By pradeepviswav · Posted
Qualcomm's new Snapdragon Reality Elite chip brings on-device AI to Android XR devices by Pradeep Viswanathan Qualcomm has been delivering dedicated SoCs for mixed reality and spatial computing devices for several years. The journey started with the Snapdragon XR1, followed by the Snapdragon XR2 in 2019, the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 in September 2023, and finally the Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2 in 2024. Today, Qualcomm announced a major upgrade with the new Snapdragon Reality Elite Platform, which targets premium mixed reality and spatial computing devices. OEMs can use this SoC to power both all-in-one video-see-through headsets and lightweight, tethered optical-see-through glasses. Qualcomm highlighted that the Snapdragon Reality Elite will power the next wave of Android XR devices coming later this year. These wearables will offer better visuals, improved power efficiency, and deeper on-device AI integration compared to the previous generation. The Snapdragon Reality Elite can deliver up to 48 TOPS of AI performance, allowing large language models and large vision models to run directly on the device for the first time. In addition to enabling new spatial AI experiences, these new AI capabilities will improve head and hand tracking, as well as see-through features. On the performance side, the Snapdragon Reality Elite offers up to 60% higher GPU performance, up to 30% higher CPU performance, and up to 160% higher NPU performance compared to the previous generation. The platform supports visuals of up to 4.4K per eye at 90 frames per second for sharper images and smoother motion. Qualcomm is also claiming significant efficiency improvements. The Snapdragon Reality Elite can offer up to 20% longer battery life under the same workload. More importantly, the chipset can run up to 12 degrees Celsius cooler under load, making headsets more comfortable for users to wear for longer periods. The platform also includes improvements to video see-through, featuring lower latency and better image quality. Qualcomm states that its EVA hardware block helps accelerate demanding computer vision workloads, improving how digital content blends with the real world. -
By Nas · Posted
Umm... GitHub continues to use AWS. That's the story, that's the headline. There's no "new" news here. GitHub continues to require additional capacity beyond the originally-planned Azure allocations. There's nothing special about this; nothing noteworthy. They're still using AWS' infra until the cutover is complete. -
By goretsky · Posted
Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky -
By goretsky · Posted
Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky -
By vjlex · Posted
"just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
-
-
Recent Achievements
-
vjlex earned a badge
Collaborator
-
Dys Topia earned a badge
Reacting Well
-
NovaEdgeX earned a badge
Conversation Starter
-
Console General earned a badge
One Year In
-
Twozo Technologies earned a badge
Week One Done
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Tell a friend
Question
john smith 1924 Veteran
I've created this sticky thread for members to post their hosts that they use for their website. Clearly, we arent really looking here for the free hosts- geocities, lycos etc - rather the ones you pay for. We want to know about your good and bad expierences, how reliable they have been, how flexable on bandwidth, and overall feature wise. Do it in this format :
host name :
Notable Features :
Pros:
Problems:
Overall:
Link:
So - i'll start of for my website Zeebit :)
host name : OLM
Notable Features : PHP /Mysql, lots of free cgi scripts, PuTTY access, Password protect directories, FTP access
Pros: Excellent tech support- like 5 min replies - and useful ones at that, gives basic stats, Always fast and i've never had the website down - good VFM in general.
Problems: Only 1 FTP account on my setup, No PHPMyAdmin for DB stuff, Have a few probs everynow and again accessing the control panel - which is fairly limited if i'm honest- i'd prefer Cpanel - but for the price- its ok.
Overall: Mainly good- but a few downsides.
Link: http://www.olm.net
I will edit this thread to keep it clean and to the point :)
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/59352-neowins-top-hosts/Share on other sites
335 answers to this question
Recommended Posts