Sick of PS3 Bashing


Recommended Posts

To the OP; people are mad at Sony because they ****ed up. It's that simple. 2 years ago, Sony and Sony fans were trashing the 360 every chance they got, ejaculating endlessly over the cell processor and Blu-ray, and how Sony was going to make MS's 360 look like a K-mart toy next to their gaming Porsche. Now we're here; Sony die-hards complaining about their poor console's critics, and saying to lay off. What goes around comes around, I say. These threads crying about Sony-bashing are often mis-labeled; if someone can actually have a debate without resorting to, "You're wrong and I'm right, so STFU!", it's not bashing, it's discussion. You're allowed to report the trolling, but not the well-thought out arguments, please.

That's where I believe some people think you are blind. It doesn't have to be only "You're wrong, I'm right so STFU!" to be trolling. These are not well thought out arguements, but merely the same recycled garbage posts we've seen for just over a year now. That's not "well thought out" to me, just repetition. I believe the term flamebait is also in the forum policies... and mentioning small jabs about owners "ejaculating endlessly" and "crying" is just the very foundation. There's that flamebait for you, but surely not from a moderator? The OP is probably trying to take this from a personal aspect as well as a technical/hardware aspect - about other users being asinine.

It is old. And it's quite eye opening to see that it's not only us Playstation owners making a statement about it. But I wouldn't expect any action from you other than a continuation of keyboard attacks. :rolleyes: Try making critiques about the Playstation in this current time without using last year's bandwagon approach... it might be more acceptable.

Like how this is turning out :laugh:

One side there's those viscous and evil Xbox 360 owners, whose only intend is to flame and bash

On the other side of the fence, there's the cute & fluffy PS3 owners, who has never said anything wrong, done anything wrong - Angels!

That's where I believe some people think you are blind. It doesn't have to be only "You're wrong, I'm right so STFU!" to be trolling. These are not well thought out arguements, but merely the same recycled garbage posts we've seen for just over a year now. That's not "well thought out" to me, just repetition. I believe the term flamebait is also in the forum policies... and mentioning small jabs about owners "ejaculating endlessly" and "crying" is just the very foundation. There's that flamebait for you, but surely not from a moderator? The OP is probably trying to take this from a personal aspect as well as a technical/hardware aspect - about other users being asinine.

It is old. And it's quite eye opening to see that it's not only us Playstation owners making a statement about it. But I wouldn't expect any action from you other than a continuation of keyboard attacks. :rolleyes: Try making critiques about the Playstation in this current time without using last year's bandwagon approach... it might be more acceptable.

The only flaw I see in your argument is making the assumption that people are starting threads about their bad opinion of the PS3. Most of the time this "bashing" occurs in news posts (generally bad for Sony) where people are trying to point out why the PS3 is good/bad as per the article and others try to counter the argument. That's what I think Joel was talking about. "Orange Box Delayed for PS3" and a post of "Ha! Sony sux!" would be flamebait and trolling, but discussing the difficulties being encountered by many studios in coding for the PS3 is just that, a discussion.

Edit: Also, I don't think you'll find GT5 more "fine tuned" than Forza 2, or possibly Forza 3, whic might be released by the time GT5 comes out. PGR4 is excellent for the type of game it is also (less simulation).

Edited by Ironman273
The only flaw I see in your argument is making the assumption that people are starting threads about their bad opinion of the PS3. Most of the time this "bashing" occurs in news posts (generally bad for Sony) where people are trying to point out why the PS3 is good/bad as per the article and others try to counter the argument. That's what I think Joel was talking about. "Orange Box Delayed for PS3" and a post of "Ha! Sony sux!" would be flamebait and trolling, but discussing the difficulties being encountered by many studios in coding for the PS3 is just that, a discussion.

Try not to be fooled easily. You, as well as I, know that we've seen those sorts of posts even in the positive news threads. This "discussion" you speak of... it appears that some people have a different thought about what that really is. Even without being vulgar or childish with one's comments, there can still be quick hits and blatant flamebait. Again... it's just the same ol' recycled comments we've seen over and over again. And when such comments flood a discussion, it makes it nearly impossible to debate hardware, marketing and development intelligently without users fueling the fire.

Of all things - a moderator should be locking these sorts of threads. We all know the outcome each and every time... you this, you that, blah blah blah.

There are several reasons why the PS3 gets bashed:

1.The biggest reason, the PS2 dominated last gen sales, no argument. Its a natural feeling to dislike those on the top. Its the same in sports how every hates the yankees, patriots, la lakers...ect...apply that to consoles, PS2 was on top and people want the underdogs, X360 and Wii to prevail to show that Sony isnt the only contender...that is the biggest reason

2. Sony screwed themselves... They made a lot of promises that were never held up. Look at what was originally promised for the PS3 i think at e3 '05. That, along with their disastrous PR comments

3. The games available. PS3 isnt producing games like the PS2 was mainly because there is much stronger compeition

To the OP; people are mad at Sony because they ****ed up. It's that simple. 2 years ago, Sony and Sony fans were trashing the 360 every chance they got, ejaculating endlessly over the cell processor and Blu-ray, and how Sony was going to make MS's 360 look like a K-mart toy next to their gaming Porsche. Now we're here; Sony die-hards complaining about their poor console's critics, and saying to lay off. What goes around comes around, I say. These threads crying about Sony-bashing are often mis-labeled; if someone can actually have a debate without resorting to, "You're wrong and I'm right, so STFU!", it's not bashing, it's discussion. You're allowed to report the trolling, but not the well-thought out arguments, please.

*claps*

It's not the PS3; it's Sony. Their attitude, their promises, their arrogance- these things were never backed up. PS3 exclusives are simply not as good as exclusives on other platforms at the moment. Uncharted looks fantastic, but not fantastic enough to warrant a $400+ purchase. I've seen promotions giving away 15 Blu-ray movies with each PS3, but the things still aren't selling. It was strange to see everything else selling like hotcakes on Black Friday, while PS3s sat in huge piles in nearly every store I went to.

The console itself may be great, but the potential isn't being realized.

Can we all not agree to disagree ? Both consoles have there faults and both have there strengths ! I think it's all down to what you want heck I want mass effect so will be getting a 360 ! I adore the wii for all the Nintendo goodness i.e. Mario and Metroid !

I bought a PS3 on black friday and I'm pretty satisfied. I have a PSP already so I'm already loving the XMB interface.

I wish the fanboy wars would quit though. Everybody buys the console they want for a reason, why should they be lauded for it.

Anywho, I plan to pick up some blu-ray flicks. I haven't made it back to my home yet since I'm (home home) for the holidays so i don't have an HD display to test it with. I need to get back to my place so I can really see how the PS3 does.

lets put the games, software, hardware and all other things about the 360 and ps3 aside and look at the way they're built. a friend own both the 360 elite and the ps3. when it comes to loading times, noise from the console and parts used to build them, we both agree that ps3 has the 360 beat, hands down.

it's like 360 was built by GM and ps3 by BMW.

Heres how I see 'the war' at the moment, think i've been rather fair:

PS3:-

A lot of unused potential

PSN, slowly growing, will be great in time

Controls, the old design seems to work best

Reliable hardware

Hardware performance, its there, so long as time is spent on it

Built in Blu-Ray

Great media options

back compat on older models

Upgradable SATA 2.5'' HDD

web browser

great psp interactivity

not as loud, but can be sometimes

X360

Large games library

Not particularly great quality hardware build

Live, A lot of content, but it has been around 5 years

optional HD-DVD

Largely windows centric media functions

no motion control (though hardly important)

Is normally the focus console in multiplatform development

Loud

limited back compat

optional 20gb and 120gb hdd's

Wii

Great interface

minimal but functional online functions (for games)

100% GCN compatible

Limited storage

non HD

great first party titles

third party titles a bit 'meh'

web browser

underpowered hardware

virtual console

loud disc drive

future DS related software

limited media options

lets put the games, software, hardware and all other things about the 360 and ps3 aside ... ps3 has the 360 beat, hands down.

Yes. When you take away everything that really matters in a console, the PS3 wins. Why couldn't we all just see it from that perspective to begin with :rolleyes:

I honestly can't even fathom how you thought that that might possibly have been a good argument.

-Spenser

Yes. When you take away everything that really matters in a console, the PS3 wins. Why couldn't we all just see it from that perspective to begin with :rolleyes:

I honestly can't even fathom how you thought that that might possibly have been a good argument.

-Spenser

well lets see:

1. it has SOMETHING to do with the consoles, they're being COMPARED

2. I CLEARLY stated in my post to put everything ASIDE and commented on that particular thing

3. the BUILD of the console matters, a lot, not to mention the NOISE and LOADING times

there, I put the important words into caps, as you seem to be BLIND.

well lets see:

1. it has SOMETHING to do with the consoles, they're being COMPARED

2. I CLEARLY stated in my post to put everything ASIDE and commented on that particular thing

3. the BUILD of the console matters, a lot, not to mention the NOISE and LOADING times

there, I put the important words into caps, as you seem to be BLIND.

'something' isn't an important word.

In your OP, you didn't mention anything about the build of the console as a whole, you only mentioned the noise and loading times. For one, the noise from the 360 isn't a big deal to the vast majority of people. Second, loading times don't mean jack **** if the game is crap, not to mention they're really a nonissue, considering even though they may be longer, they aren't a ridiculous length in any game I've experienced.

My point still stands. You're terrible at making arguments. You took out everything that mattered and then tried to compare them. This stuff doesn't work like that.

-Spenser

My PS3 makes more noise than my 360 - Loading time, in Port games are mostly longer on the PS3 as far is I've seen.

Bingo.. not only that PS3 is louder, but the load times are a complete joke. This is mostly because of Blu-Ray. Motorscross, Heavenly Sword, ridiculous load times. On Heavenly Sword it becomes completely annoying that you have to wait almost a minute to replay the level when you die.

I'm not sure what people are talking about when they say PS3 is quieter and loads faster. I guess people seem to see and hear what it suits them.

Heres how I see 'the war' at the moment, think i've been rather fair:

PS3:-

A lot of unused potential

PSN, slowly growing, will be great in time

Controls, the old design seems to work best

Reliable hardware

Hardware performance, its there, so long as time is spent on it

Built in Blu-Ray

Great media options

back compat on older models

Upgradable SATA 2.5'' HDD

web browser

great psp interactivity

not as loud, but can be sometimes

X360

Large games library

Not particularly great quality hardware build

Live, A lot of content, but it has been around 5 years

optional HD-DVD

Largely windows centric media functions

no motion control (though hardly important)

Is normally the focus console in multiplatform development

Loud

limited back compat

optional 20gb and 120gb hdd's

Wii

Great interface

minimal but functional online functions (for games)

100% GCN compatible

Limited storage

non HD

great first party titles

third party titles a bit 'meh'

web browser

underpowered hardware

virtual console

loud disc drive

future DS related software

limited media options

LOL at your view of the consoles and how you downplay everything on Xbox 360 even though your statements are completely incorrect... all you do is put assumptions on PS3 without any solid backing (reasoning) based on what we saw so far, yet you go and downplay Xbox 360 things because what? Live has been out for 5 years? Who is responsible for that? That's called great planning and developement. This shows that Sony is so much about money that even though they had the lead they stopped innovating gaming. They just thought, PS2 will do everything for them.

It really boggles the mind how people justify things.

In your OP, you didn't mention anything about the build of the console as a whole, you only mentioned the noise and loading times.
when it comes to loading times, noise from the console and parts used to build them,
For one, the noise from the 360 isn't a big deal to the vast majority of people.

You care to provide proof for that statement?

You took out everything that mattered and then tried to compare them. This stuff doesn't work like that.

See, that's the beautiful thing about comparing, a person gets to choose what they want to compare in the items.

I own a 360, and I have to admit, when I rented a launch console, it was loud as hell. But, in about 10 minutes I couldn't hear it.

Now, I can't hear my 360 at all. I guess I have just adapted to it. Maybe the same applies to PS3 gamers?

The sound on ocassion might be coming from the drive (not always though). On the other hand, when PS3 cooling turbines start spinning the whole freakin' room echos.

I always laugh when I go to GameStop and they have PS3 running, and the whole freakin' store is humming. LOL.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!