Windows Vista Service Pack 1 RTM x86 leaked


Recommended Posts

Yeah for 64bit you need to give yourself owner rights and full permissions over the dll files :p or just use "take control" linked in that link!

What I mean is that there is a uxtheme.dll inside the sysWOW64 folder as well as in System32 folder. And the size differs from the one in System32. Hence my question.

All I can see is reg hacks to what seem to be beta builds :(

Please google Windows Vista SP1 Refresh 2 Reg ...4 letter word that begins with h...

RC1 Refresh 2 is the same as RTM, don't listen to what anyone else says about it, it was confirmed by MS.

If interested....some of the torrent sites have slipstreamed sp1 into vista. I took my LEGAL

product ID, wiped out a backup laptop drive, installed it and activated it with no problem.

Personally, when a SP comes out, I prefer to wipe and install with the SP slipstreamed.

Finally got my hands on the x64 version and have it installed. I've noticed a little more pep in the system. I tested copying a file, which was SP1 x64 and 726mb. It took about 30 seconds to copy, yay!

For those that are holding off to download the file from Microsoft, it's available on their OEM site. It's a DVD image that contains the standalone installers for SP1 both x86 and x64.

Link is here: http://oem.microsoft.com/downloads/VistaSP...frmcsp0_dvd.img

However, the download speeds are horrific. I'm just about managing 12KB/s. Download does take a while to get going.

Use of a download manager is highly recommended.

There appears to be 2 versions of the standalone installers, and I'm not sure which one is the offical..

The first is the ones that appears days ago that people were downloading from different mirrors.

The MD5s were:

X86: d597866e93bc8f80ecca234c4e9ce5a2

X64: 983308426e8ee7649f53b41f4e5c42d4

However, I downloaded the ISO that contains both of the files, as shown here:

83758877sv5.jpg

The installers on this disc, have different timestamps and MD5's.

If we compare the 2 x64 installers:

43010055kf0.jpg

Can anyone shed any light on to which installer is the one to use?

There appears to be 2 versions of the standalone installers, and I'm not sure which one is the offical..

The first is the ones that appears days ago that people were downloading from different mirrors.

The MD5s were:

X86: d597866e93bc8f80ecca234c4e9ce5a2

X64: 983308426e8ee7649f53b41f4e5c42d4

However, I downloaded the ISO that contains both of the files, as shown here:

The installers on this disc, have different timestamps and MD5's.

If we compare the 2 x64 installers:

Can anyone shed any light on to which installer is the one to use?

Could you check the actual installers? Have a look inside the actual exe and see what the time stamps etc are inside?

When will people learn, DON'T DOWNLOAD LEADKED FILES I would not have installed it to be honest but people will jump into the fire and get burned.

not again..... :p i guess digital signatures don't mean anything to you?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft kills AI-powered history search feature in Edge by Usama Jawad In June 2025, Microsoft began rolling out AI-powered history search functionality with Edge 138. The idea was simple: allow customers to use natural language phrases and synonyms to find their desired history items rather than matching keywords exactly. Although the company had already rolled out this capability in a phased manner, it has now decided to cancel it. In an update on its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has announced that it has decided not to move forward with AI-powered history search. The company has not detailed the exact reasoning behind this move, but it has apologized to customers for the inconvenience. The move is rather interesting as it seemingly could have improved user productivity. Edge users wouldn't have to worry about typos or exact keywords, and just focus on what they were trying to locate in their browser history. Microsoft had also assured users that an on-device AI model would be leveraged for this functionality, and no data would be sent to the cloud. IT admins also had the ability to control its availability through the EdgeHistoryAISearchEnabled policy. When the feature began rolling out last year, many of our readers called it creepy, noting that they couldn't trust Microsoft to keep their data on their device. Others also questioned its usefulness, saying that it's simply a way for Microsoft to insert more AI bloat into its products. Although the Redmond tech giant had stated that it will be more mindful about surfacing Copilot features in Windows 11 apps, we later discussed how this is mostly a rebranding exercise rather than an actual axing of AI functionalities. Indeed, a Microsoft executive later emphasized how they want to reshape Windows for the agentic AI era. That said, it does seem like at least AI-powered Edge history search isn't a part of that vision.
    • For you to jump on and defend your sweetheart? I agree, it didn't.
    • Not likely, of course, that we will see routine citizenship checks as they only involve compliance with existing federal voting laws already on the books for decades. This seems a non-issue entirely. Only fools would have the government rush headlong into an AI program few can understand or predict, or even debug...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Kolakid60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      424
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!