Forthcoming changes on Bans & Moderations


Recommended Posts

I'd like to announce that soon we will be changing the way bans and moderations are handled on Neowin.

Anyone currently on 40% warn rating will automatically have their warn bar shown globally, the members that continue to frustrate and test the staff will be exposed in this manner. Neowin is a community and it is only fair that your peers know who the bad apples are. Time and time again certain members invoke an additional warning even after the automatic reduction comes into force.

I'd bet that we are the only community that even has an automatic reduction system, the result is that certain members may actually break the rules on more than 5 occasions because after 6 months the warning level is reduced by 20%.

Additionally we will also be adding a forum at the foot of the index that shows members who have been banned, what rule they broke and when, no personal information will be shown (such as PM exchanges) but it should give other members an idea as to how lenient we have remained and show the extent of rule breaking on that members part.

To be fair to members that have racked up 40% by "screwing up that one time too many" we will invoke a global reduction of 20% for everyone before this comes into force. We aren't worried about those members on 80% or 100% getting a freebie because generally those members will always screw up.

I know some of you may say, "Well, hell I'll just make a new account!" we are quite good at finding members who do that, and someone who has to create a new account to escape bans or warnings isn't the type of member we want here or the community would want, not to mention those types usually crop up quite quickly on our radar.

Discuss!

PS: We will announce when it comes into force, at the moment we have a few projects on the table and this is one thats being moved up to "priority"

Sounds like a great improvement. Hopefully the additional information that will be shown about bans will help to avoid situations like the 'snypergate' scandal.

also, showing 40%< bans publicly should persuade those with such warning to keep their nose clean.

will the reduction period remain at 6 months?

/note to self, trademark the words 'snypergate'

Thanks allan, hey dev.. it will be something like member broke rule 5 on x date, it will be up to the moderator in how much detail will be posted.

The idea behind it is to show how often a member is warned and eventually banned. At the moment banned members are all too often painted as the victims because we try not to "hang out the dirty washing" and that has to stop in my opinion, also those members on 40% or higher because usually they are just plain jackasses in threads and to other members, this will expose them who take up so much of our time.

Good members need not worry, and thats the types we want here anyway eh?

Well, sometimes a warning is unfair. I was unjustly accused and got a warning after being here for an insane amount of years.

I'm at a 20% warn because a new mod didn't know what sarcasm was. It's unfortunate. I mean, you actually think I'm intentionally making trouble after being a member for so long? I don't think so. It was just a misunderstanding.

Well, sometimes a warning is unfair. I was unjustly accused and got a warning after being here for an insane amount of years.

I'm at a 20% warn because a new mod didn't know what sarcasm was. It's unfortunate. I mean, you actually think I'm intentionally making trouble after being a member for so long? I don't think so. It was just a misunderstanding.

Guys like you are protected under the new system.. with only 20% your warn bars won't be shown ;)

I like the idea.

Not only is it "shameful" to wear this as a badge, but it's another thing when people wear this as a Badge on Honor.

I can give you a 101 reasons not to push back at the moderators, but you need to remember, they are people just like YOU and ME. If you were in their shoes, what would you want? They spend their free time to keep the community from turning into just another profanity and flamming forum, if they didn't do that, then what's the point of even being here? The last response I want when I post a topic is something that just turns into a battle

I've had a few disagreements with some mods over warnings, that only makes matters worse. Just let it go, and think before you post

Another key point to this system would be for members to avoid confrontation with members with warn bars shown, to keep you out of the "dog house" so to speak.

Edited by lylesback2
Good idea (Y)

The only next thing I'd like to see at somepoint is a breakdown on who voted what rating on a topic.

Thats asking for trouble lol.. you'd have people starting threads because a member voted 1 on a thread.. I think it's better anonymous.. don't you?

I like the idea.

Not only is it "shameful" to wear this as a badge, but it's another thing when people wear this as a Badge on Honor.

True and this point has been raised between staff, the way I see it is that if a member wears it as a badge of honour is that the type of member we even want here on the forums?

It could be a blessing in disguise.. Those who are exposed might leave sooner or just screw up a lot quicker rather than continually testing the staff moderators anonymously, with all the members unaware how troublesome the person is to us.

Thats asking for trouble lol.. you'd have people starting threads because a member voted 1 on a thread.. I think it's better anonymous.. don't you?

I actually think it would weed out the problem, as in a good % of those who vote 1-star as they don't like to topic poster/like the content being posted wouldn't want the shame of everyone knowing.

Good topics in the movie section can get 1-starred as people don't like the movie, but a LOT of the 1-star voting in the GH comes out of spite/hate rather than showing a reflection of the content posted in the topic.

It's one thing to vote a topic 1-star as the content is poor/topic is "useless" but it's another thing to vote a perfectly ok topic 1-star (within reason, as I said the movie voting stands on it's own).

Happens to me a lot, I guess im just curious to find out who does it :rofl:

Maybe if it was moderator visible ONLY then moderators would know who to watch (Y) Or they could even go as far to tell someone off through a PM if they see an unjust voting trend from that member.

True and this point has been raised between staff, the way I see it is that if a member wears it as a badge of honour is that the type of member we even want here on the forums?

It could be a blessing in disguise.. Those who are exposed might leave sooner or just screw up a lot quicker rather than continually testing the staff moderators anonymously, with all the members unaware how troublesome the person is to us.

I back Neowins cleaning house policy 110%. I remembered the forum discussion we had around 2 months ago, about how to make Neowin a better place, and steps need to be taken to ensure a safer, cleaner community, before Neowin ends up offline.

Prices need to be paid, and yeah it sucks if you know someone who gets caught in the cross fire, but it's what needs to be done to ensure Neowin stays online. I think a lot of people don't understand that, especially over the last month, to two months. The moderators deserve a break. I think they do more patrolling then they do posting.

There is the problem of carrying the warning indicator as a badge of honor. There might be a problem of people without the warning indicator dissing the people with a warning indicator just because they are marked as such.

I feel unease that the members with more than 60% of warnings are put in some sort of virtual stocks.

Yet, I don't have a better idea to police the community and ease the burden on the staff and the staff has a much wider experience than me dealing with immature members so go for it.

Edit: as a matter of fact, I have a suggestion: instead of a five level warning, reduce it to three levels: three strikes and you're out.

I actually think it would weed out the problem, as in a good % of those who vote 1-star as they don't like to topic poster/like the content being posted wouldn't want the shame of everyone knowing.

Good topics in the movie section can get 1-starred as people don't like the movie, but a LOT of the 1-star voting in the GH comes out of spite/hate rather than showing a reflection of the content posted in the topic.

It's one thing to vote a topic 1-star as the content is poor/topic is "useless" but it's another thing to vote a perfectly ok topic 1-star (within reason, as I said the movie voting stands on it's own).

Happens to me a lot, I guess im just curious to find out who does it :rofl:

Maybe if it was moderator visible ONLY then moderators would know who to watch (Y) Or they could even go as far to tell someone off through a PM if they see an unjust voting trend from that member.

Do thread ratings really matter that much? I mean we get 6000 new threads a month so who cares if someone lamenting about wanting to have sex with three girls has a one star rating on that thread? In a month that thread will probably be dead.

On a game developer forum I frequent, there's a person rating system (with numbers, not with up to five stars) and every once in a while someone breaks the unspoken rule: complaining about their rating, which of course is followed by a barrage of negative rating, usually dropping the person by hundreds. It simply doesn't matter, so who cares? People rating your thread with 1 star because they don't like you? Welcome to the intarwebs.

There is the problem of carrying the warning indicator as a badge of honor. There might be a problem of people without the warning indicator dissing the people with a warning indicator just because they are marked as such.

I feel unease that the members with more than 60% of warnings are put in some sort of virtual stocks.

Yet, I don't have a better idea to police the community and ease the burden on the staff and the staff has a much wider experience than me dealing with immature members so go for it.

Those people will face the law soon enough.

Absolutely unreasonable and downright stupid to run around claiming your warning status makes you "superior". They'll learn the hard way :rofl:

There might be a problem of people without the warning indicator dissing the people with a warning indicator just because they are marked as such.

Diss and ye shall join the ranks of those you mock! :laugh:

Do thread ratings really matter that much? I mean we get 6000 new threads a month so who cares if someone lamenting about wanting to have sex with three girls has a one star rating on that thread? In a month that thread will probably be dead.

On a game developer forum I frequent, there's a person rating system (with numbers, not with up to five stars) and every once in a while someone breaks the unspoken rule: complaining about their rating, which of course is followed by a barrage of negative rating, usually dropping the person by hundreds. It simply doesn't matter, so who cares?

Whether or not you think it matters, it's very sad to see the majority of your topics get slanted. I understand there are subjective posts, where it's reasonable to either dislike or like the post outright, but there are a lot of posts that do/speak of good only, that really don't deserve to be slanted.

I guess it's more of a personal request from me as I experience unlawful voting, but I see no harm in putting those to shame who go out their way to make it an unpleasant experience for other members on the forum.

The GH is a special case IMO as there is huge tension at times between "sides". You may have been aware of the huge shake up in there a while back.

I do speak from the GH, but that's as it's the section I frequent in. I know this happens all over the board.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=617063 - 17 ratings with an average of 2? I voted it 5 to try and bring it back up. Why does a topic like that need to be voted 1 star? It's asking people if they are picking up a different coloured console?! - Not saying x is better than y, or discussing a subjective matter. I guess you could say it's voting as to whether or not you like the colour, but I still think it looks bad.

Topic voting to me outside of the movie section should be voting based on how worthwile the topic is to neowin, if the topic is well layed out and formatted and how enjoyable you found it to be. I know a lot of voting is based on if you like what you see though, for example if you support Apple and hate MS, you'll trawl windows topics and rate them 1-star... If you want to discuss the content, do it in the topic, don't rate it and do a runner...

I still stand by my suggestion and I think the idea of the moderators being the only ones who know whos voted what, will help them greatly when it comes to dealing with problems (eg, they'll have an idea of whos gone into a topic to stir things up... or they'll uncover unjust voting trends).

Edited by Audioboxer

Lol I have 100% though... man, and it was only because of signature violations and calling some guy an idiot and flame-baiting. So I mean, it wasn't anything too bad. Hopefully people won't change their perspective on me (or other such members) through this display of warnings.

Lol I have 100% though... man, and it was only because of signature violations and calling some guy an idiot and flame-baiting. So I mean, it wasn't anything too bad. Hopefully people won't change their perspective on me (or other such members) through this display of warnings.

Now that you got your profile back, thanks to yours truly - now you can work on getting your warning level down with quality posts (Y)

Radish?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Trailer park trash “sport “, fits the current White House
    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!