Recommended Posts

the only thing I watch now is NXT because its new and fresh but once that goes stale I am outta here but not for good, I have dedicated a good 20 years of my life to following wrestling I will never just not be interested.

Yeah, I'm like that now. I've watched wrestling since I was eight years old. I sort of remember the first time I saw WWF on the TV. It was an episode of Sunday Night Heat on Channel 4; a tag match with The Headbangers, but I can't remember who they faced. It wasn't long after that that I watched my very first WWF pay-per-view, the 2000 Royal Rumble, which was also on Channel 4. Back then, I only had regular TV, so I could only watch WWF whenever it was on Channel 4, so I saw the Royal Rumble, then the next PPV I saw was Backlash. Then a month or two later, we finally got Sky Digital, and the first PPV on Sky Sports I saw was King of the Ring.

This was all in 2000. Great times. :)

I stopped watching WWE a couple of years ago, then turned to TNA full-time, but even now I've gone off that since they brought in Hulk Hogan. I still keep an eye on the storylines from time to time, but the only wrestling thing I watch full-time now is Botchamania. :p Can't get enough of it. One of my favourite bits ever is in The Best of Botchamania.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjOD-22d9Pg

It's just 12 seconds in after the traditional "Macho Man" Randy Savage quote, and just after Kevin Nash going "I'm the s**t, I'm tellin' ya!" :D

If anyone's interested in Botchamania, there's a website, but the videos always get uploaded a few days earlier to Maffew's newest YouTube page first.

I have read the reports from both shows...

Raw sounded like "just any other dull show" to me, surprised they aren't defending themselves more?!

I must say this. at least Raw wasn't full of old-timers .. Hogan, Flair, Sting, Hall, Nash, Waltman. at least Bischoff wasn't out there dancing with the seniors

tho, it's always nice seeing Hogan getting multiple beatdowns

ok, Raw has one old-timer on TV, but Vince McMahon is actually in shape and can still get out and perform (even if it is in a handicap gauntlet match)

Last night's edition of WWE Monday Night RAW scored a 3.4 cable rating.

Last night's edition of TNA iMPACT! scored a 1.0 cable rating.

Both shows were way down this week. More shortly.

It's obviously going to be tough for TNA iMPACT! next week as they're running a taped show head-to-head with the return of Steve Austin and three WrestleMania rematches. They also face a Bret Hart-Vince McMahon contract signing.

Last night's edition of WWE Monday Night RAW scored a 3.4 cable rating.

Last night's edition of TNA iMPACT! scored a 1.0 cable rating.

Both shows were way down this week. More shortly.

It's obviously going to be tough for TNA iMPACT! next week as they're running a taped show head-to-head with the return of Steve Austin and three WrestleMania rematches. They also face a Bret Hart-Vince McMahon contract signing.

i looked at the results a few hours ago. the show is gonna suck

Stone Cold is hosting RAW next week! I wonder will he be there just for one night or he has some plans for WrestleMania!

Do you mean show up and guest referee or something? Or wrestle? Because he's never going to wrestle again sadly :(

Here is the updated WWE WrestleMania 26 card:

* Bret Hart vs. Vince McMahon

* HHH vs. Sheamus

* CM Punk vs. Rey Mysterio

* Money In The Bank Ladder Match: Christian vs. Dolph Ziggler vs. Kane vs. Shelton Benjamin vs. Jack Swagger vs. MVP vs. Matt Hardy vs. Evan Bourne vs. Drew McIntyre

* Unified Tag Team Title Match: The Miz and The Big Show ? vs. John Morrison and R-Truth

* Career vs. Streak ? Winner By Pin or Submission Only: Shawn Michaels vs. The Undertaker

* WWE Title Match: Batista ? vs. John Cena

* World Title Match: Chris Jericho ? vs. Edge

Here is the updated WWE WrestleMania 26 card:

* Bret Hart vs. Vince McMahon

* HHH vs. Sheamus

* CM Punk vs. Rey Mysterio

* Money In The Bank Ladder Match: Christian vs. Dolph Ziggler vs. Kane vs. Shelton Benjamin vs. Jack Swagger vs. MVP vs. Matt Hardy vs. Evan Bourne vs. Drew McIntyre

* Unified Tag Team Title Match: The Miz and The Big Show ? vs. John Morrison and R-Truth

* Career vs. Streak ? Winner By Pin or Submission Only: Shawn Michaels vs. The Undertaker

* WWE Title Match: Batista ? vs. John Cena

* World Title Match: Chris Jericho ? vs. Edge

Bret hart will win

HHH lol

hmm dunno maybe rey mysterio

Christian

Miz and the big show

Undertaker

John Cena

Edge

Here is the updated WWE WrestleMania 26 card:

* Bret Hart vs. Vince McMahon

* HHH vs. Sheamus

* CM Punk vs. Rey Mysterio

* Money In The Bank Ladder Match: Christian vs. Dolph Ziggler vs. Kane vs. Shelton Benjamin vs. Jack Swagger vs. MVP vs. Matt Hardy vs. Evan Bourne vs. Drew McIntyre

* Unified Tag Team Title Match: The Miz and The Big Show ? vs. John Morrison and R-Truth

* Career vs. Streak ? Winner By Pin or Submission Only: Shawn Michaels vs. The Undertaker

* WWE Title Match: Batista ? vs. John Cena

* World Title Match: Chris Jericho ? vs. Edge

Okay so here are my predictions:

  • Bret Hart will win.
  • I do not care but HHH will win.
  • I do not care but CM Punk will win.
  • MITB is very hard to call. My best guess would be Christian at this point.
  • ShowMiz will win.
  • Shawn Michaels will win for sure, even though that is totally retarded.
  • I do not care but Batista will win.
  • Edge will win.

I also think that HBK will win. But I don't like it, I mean if he wins, then he will be the first who defeats and has been defeated by The Undertaker.

But then, who is the right person other than HBK to end taker's streak?

if Taker loses it means he will retire this year, the fact HBK is taking 6 months off after WM means he might just lose.

I do not care but Batista will win.

I do not think Batista will win. Firstly Batista has beaten Cena at SummerSlam 2008 and he is the bad guy now who has hurt Cena a lot. So I think its revenge time for Cena at WrestleMania 26.

if Taker loses it means he will retire this year, the fact HBK is taking 6 months off after WM means he might just lose.

Yeah that's also right but how will WWE handle HBK's obsession?

As rumored earlier, Ultimate Warrior apparently pulled out of this year's 2010 WWE Hall of Fame over the payday he was set to receive from WWE and the terms of the non-compete clause. Most WWE Hall of Famers get $5,000 along with a ring, although that number may be different for other bigger names. The belief is that Warrior was getting paid much more since this year was being designed to be built around him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!