Recommended Posts

 

According to Bryan Alvarez of Figure Four Weekly, while WWE is ruling out Hulk Hogan for WrestleMania 30, as the company expects him to return to TNA, officials are eyeing Sting for a possible appearance at the big event.

 

With TNA being in a state of total disarray, the report notes WWE believes it can bring Sting in for a WrestleMania appearance. "The WWE side believes that Hogan's ultimately TNA-bound, but they also feel there is a decent chance that they may end up being able to get Sting for WrestleMania next year," the report reads.

Hello,

 

According to Bryan Alvarez of Figure Four Weekly, while WWE is ruling out Hulk Hogan for WrestleMania 30, as the company expects him to return to TNA, officials are eyeing Sting for a possible appearance at the big event.

 

With TNA being in a state of total disarray, the report notes WWE believes it can bring Sting in for a WrestleMania appearance. "The WWE side believes that Hogan's ultimately TNA-bound, but they also feel there is a decent chance that they may end up being able to get Sting for WrestleMania next year," the report reads.

The percentage of this being unlikely is so big I could copy/paste the numbers and I still wouldnt reach it! :p

Jokes aside, Sting is 54 years old. He has NEVER wrestled in the WWE (or WWF or etc). The money they would have to not only pay him but also the Undertaker (its the only reason they would even bring him to the WWE) would be huge for a guy who is going to have one match and problably a 1 year contract.

BTW, Sting brought this upon himself. He could have made a great career in the WWE (attitude era and all). But because of one stupid promo between The Rock and Booker T, he choose not to because he felt that WCW would be lowered to the bottom and would problably stay there. I guess he was right about keeping the World Heavyweight, 3 time World Tag Team, Intercontinental, US, Hardcore champion and King Of The Ring Booker T being held down and stuck at the bottom.

Hello,

 

The percentage of this being unlikely is so big I could copy/paste the numbers and I still wouldnt reach it! :p

Jokes aside, Sting is 54 years old. He has NEVER wrestled in the WWE (or WWF or etc). The money they would have to not only pay him but also the Undertaker (its the only reason they would even bring him to the WWE) would be huge for a guy who is going to have one match and problably a 1 year contract.

BTW, Sting brought this upon himself. He could have made a great career in the WWE (attitude era and all). But because of one stupid promo between The Rock and Booker T, he choose not to because he felt that WCW would be lowered to the bottom and would problably stay there. I guess he was right about keeping the World Heavyweight, 3 time World Tag Team, Intercontinental, US, Hardcore champion and King Of The Ring Booker T being held down and stuck at the bottom.

 

Booker had a short run in the WWE anyway - yea it worked good for the invasion and his KOTR win but after that..not much was done with him. Sting didn't deserve to get treated that way by Vince.. He'd constantly get stuck jobbing to lil guys plus hes got kids he wants to raise and TNA's lax schedule allows him to do that.

It doesn't really matter. Sting would be a waste of an UT WrestleMania match. He isn't in UT's league. Never was.

I would still mark out to see Sting in WWE but yeah don't give him a chance at the streak

Suppose it's just me I was always a WCW mark back in the day

 

And what did that get you? Disappointment.

Thats all it gets Sting too.

He was never that great of an in-ring talent. Decent on the mic at best. His various gimmick variations have been mostly awful.

Way overrated by WCW marks like yourself because he is their only true long term star they ever produced themselves. The only exception being Goldberg. 

If WWE brings him in for WrestleMania, I don't have a problem with it, as long as it isn't with the Taker. 

Speaking on Mania...

WWE is still very interested in landing Bill Goldberg for a match at WrestleMania 30, reports F4WOnline.com. During Ryback's match on Raw this week, Vince McMahon fed Jerry Lawler the line about fans loving the Goldberg chants that occur often during Ryback appearances. Of course, with the regular chants and the new Goldberg DVD, there's really no better time than 'Mania in New Orleans for a Goldberg return match.

Suppose it's just me I was always a WCW mark back in the day

I was too i was also a big Bret Hart fan in WWE as well as HBK... but i always somewhat favored WCW because of Sting and back then they were actually pretty good.

I was too i was also a big Bret Hart fan in WWE as well as HBK... but i always somewhat favored WCW because of Sting and back then they were actually pretty good.

I think it was because we could only get TNT so on Friday nights I would watch Nitro and that was the only wrestling I watched other than the occasional WWF PPV's.

I would love to see Sting v Undertaker.

 

Sting is awesome, and is similar to Taker in that neither are all that great wrestlers at all. Both have a small basic moveset but both are masters of the psychology of the ring. Both great at the theatrics and showmanship required to have a great match.

 

Add to that Sting does actually, genuinely have a great match left in him.  He really can put on a brilliant match still.

 

It would be much better than the last wrestlemania. Undertaker didn't really do ANYTHING all match, he relied on Punk to carry the match and for some reason Punk just ran around acting like a jumped up teenager. Awful awful match. Taker phoned it in so obviously it was embarrassing to watch.

 

If anyone needs to carry Taker through his last wrestlemania Sting should really be the one to do it.

I would love to see Sting v Undertaker.

 

Sting is awesome, and is similar to Taker in that neither are all that great wrestlers at all. Both have a small basic moveset but both are masters of the psychology of the ring. Both great at the theatrics and showmanship required to have a great match.

 

Add to that Sting does actually, genuinely have a great match left in him.  He really can put on a brilliant match still.

 

It would be much better than the last wrestlemania. Undertaker didn't really do ANYTHING all match, he relied on Punk to carry the match and for some reason Punk just ran around acting like a jumped up teenager. Awful awful match. Taker phoned it in so obviously it was embarrassing to watch.

 

If anyone needs to carry Taker through his last wrestlemania Sting should really be the one to do it.

 

Someone never watched UT before he was old and broken down. He was the most agile big man to ever grace the ring. The only person close to him is Lesnar, believe it or not.

 

Also, when was Sting's last 'brilliant match'? Forcefully holding down High Hardy?

Someone never watched UT before he was old and broken down. He was the most agile big man to ever grace the ring. The only person close to him is Lesnar, believe it or not.

 

No no I have watched him since about 1995 regularly and sporadic matches on dvd from before then.

 

He is very entertaining, and very athletic in terms of all the jumps off the rope he used to do and diving over the ropes etc. However. Good 'wrestling' to me is a little more technical than just athletics. So whilst he was very impressive to watch, he wasn't a great *wrestler*. He just knows how to make it look good.

 

Just my opinion. But I see Taker and Sting being very similar. Combine two of the greatest wresting minds in the business in a match and it ought to be great.

No no I have watched him since about 1995 regularly and sporadic matches on dvd from before then.

 

He is very entertaining, and very athletic in terms of all the jumps off the rope he used to do and diving over the ropes etc. However. Good 'wrestling' to me is a little more technical than just athletics. So whilst he was very impressive to watch, he wasn't a great *wrestler*. He just knows how to make it look good.

 

So you're referring to technical wrestling? In that case, you're correct. Taker is a brawler, always has been. But thats the style WWE has been for many years. Even Bryan, who is considered one of, if not THE, top technical wrestler in the world doesn't do much mat wrestling. Its just the way it is in WWE. 

No no I have watched him since about 1995 regularly and sporadic matches on dvd from before then.

 

He is very entertaining, and very athletic in terms of all the jumps off the rope he used to do and diving over the ropes etc. However. Good 'wrestling' to me is a little more technical than just athletics. So whilst he was very impressive to watch, he wasn't a great *wrestler*. He just knows how to make it look good.

 

Just my opinion. But I see Taker and Sting being very similar. Combine two of the greatest wresting minds in the business in a match and it ought to be great.

 

Sting has nothing left to prove in TNA and he's simply wasting his time now - Dixie has no intention of being inovative and doing what needs to be done. She takes the easy way and hires Hogan and Bishoff to try to get ratings... personally i liked TNA better when those two were no where near TNA.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If it ain't broke, don't fix it. One Commander Free also available in the Store has been my goto Files Manager for years. It does what I need at a more than reasonable speed. I do occasionally use Files Explorer just because it is there and does what I need without any problems when I use it.
    • I think you missed his point. He wasn't saying that cloud storage isn't possible on GNU/Linux, clearly it is. He was pointing out that you are commenting about your dislike of Windows on an article about OneDrive (not Windows) for Mac (also not Windows). Its about as off topic as coming to an article about Sony improving something on the PlayStation and saying that you hate Sony TVs and prefer LG.
    • Nvidia's GeForce NOW summer sale drops prices for Ultimate and Premium memberships by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Nvidia has a fresh update for GeForce NOW subscribers today, bringing in more games to add to its ever-growing supported titles list. At the same time, the company announced the kick-off for its summer sale for the streaming subscription service, dropping the prices for both its premium packages for anyone looking to upgrade or join. The offer is for the 12-month membership options that the company offers. This drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. Next, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping prices by $70 from the original $199.99. "The Performance membership delivers smooth, high-quality cloud gaming across devices, with streaming up to 1080p at 60 frames per second (fps) and access to RTX-powered servers for supported games," says Nvidia, describing its tiers. "The Ultimate membership steps things up with RTX 4080‑ or 5080‑class performance in the cloud, supporting up to 4K and beyond on ultrawide displays, up to 120 fps, and advanced features like ray tracing, NVIDIA DLSS and NVIDIA Reflex for a more responsive, visually rich experience." With the sales out of the way, here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: NBA THE RUN (New release on Steam, available on June 9) Witchspire (New release on Steam, available on June 10) SpaceCraft (New release on Steam, available on June 11) Duet Night Abyss (Launcher) DOOM Eternal (Epic Games Store) The Elder Scrolls Online (Xbox, available on Game Pass) Farever (Steam) World of Tanks: HEAT (Wargaming) Nvidia plans to add support for a bunch of more games during the rest of June. Find the full announcement from last week over here. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
    • It's actually shocking how logs filling disks has been a constant issue going back for decades, yet we see very little improvement over the years. Even in the server world, its actually shockingly common for a server to either go totally down, or have a critical alert raised due to logs filling disks.
    • YouTube has finally brought back its DMs feature, but only in these countries by David Uzondu Late last year, YouTube started testing a "new" way to share videos directly with friends, without having to leave the app. Now, the video giant has announced that is now rolling out a revamped direct messaging inbox, which lets you share videos, Shorts, and live streams and have conversations about them, directly on YouTube. The platform limits this feature to 18+ users who are signed in to a verified channel and use the latest mobile app version. Direct messaging on YouTube first became a thing back in 2017 inside the mobile app (later renamed to "Messages"), where users could chat one-on-one and share clips directly, but all that came to an end on September 18, 2019, when Google decided to shut it down after giving users a month to download a .zip file archive of their past chats. No one really knows why YouTube killed the feature, but users were encouraged to migrate to the public Comments section, on Community tab posts, and via YouTube Stories. The previous incarnation suffered from moderation challenges, prompting Google to implement stricter safety guidelines and age verifications for this new iteration. Here's a list of the countries where the re-launched feature is currently available, though note that Brand Accounts do not have access to it, at least for now: Countries American Samoa Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Guam Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Northern Mariana Islands Norway Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland U.S. Virgin Islands United Kingdom United States Before you can use the feature, you first have to send an invite link to your contact. Invite links expire exactly seven days after you create them. If the person on the other end accepts the invite, you can exchange videos directly and text back and forth inside the app. To delete a message, just long-press on the message and tap unsend to remove it for both users. You can also delete entire conversations by long-pressing the thread and selecting delete, but the other person will continue to see the chat history on their end. To make sure everything remains safe, YouTube monitors these messages to ensure they follow Community Guidelines.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      208
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!