Recommended Posts

 

So you're referring to technical wrestling? In that case, you're correct. Taker is a brawler, always has been. But thats the style WWE has been for many years. Even Bryan, who is considered one of, if not THE, top technical wrestler in the world doesn't do much mat wrestling. Its just the way it is in WWE. 

 

In broad terms technical yes, but i'm referring to general speed, selling, and breadth and depth of moveset.  I don't mean that in any disrespectful terms, he is very entertaining and carried WWF/E for quite some time.  I just think he is more showman than wrestler.

Sting has nothing left to prove in TNA and he's simply wasting his time now - Dixie has no intention of being inovative and doing what needs to be done. She takes the easy way and hires Hogan and Bishoff to try to get ratings... personally i liked TNA better when those two were no where near TNA.

Absolutely Sting has nothing left to prove in TNA. In fact, he has probably tarnished his image a little by hanging around and not being used as well as he should be.

 

IMO, one of the biggest problems with TNA is them relying on Hogan. They rely on him for name value because he is a household name, but for the people who will buy tickets to shows and buy PPVs and Merch, Hogan is the complete opposite of a draw. He can barely make it to the ring and is not good on the mic anymore.

 

I truly believe there is a role in TNA for the non-wrestling on screen manager. But they need someone people want to see. I think they need Steve Austin. If they could dig deep enough to get Austin to come in and play the on screen manager to come in and tear the place up even temporarily, viewership and revenues would skyrocket and would probably provide the boost they need. 

 

What I don't want to see is TNA fold. WWE *needs* a competitor and TNA aren't that yet. But imagine if they got to that point how good wrestling would be again...

Absolutely Sting has nothing left to prove in TNA. In fact, he has probably tarnished his image a little by hanging around and not being used as well as he should be.

 

IMO, one of the biggest problems with TNA is them relying on Hogan. They rely on him for name value because he is a household name, but for the people who will buy tickets to shows and buy PPVs and Merch, Hogan is the complete opposite of a draw. He can barely make it to the ring and is not good on the mic anymore.

 

I truly believe there is a role in TNA for the non-wrestling on screen manager. But they need someone people want to see. I think they need Steve Austin. If they could dig deep enough to get Austin to come in and play the on screen manager to come in and tear the place up even temporarily, viewership and revenues would skyrocket and would probably provide the boost they need. 

 

What I don't want to see is TNA fold. WWE *needs* a competitor and TNA aren't that yet. But imagine if they got to that point how good wrestling would be again...

 

TNA needs to do what ROH does - focus on building talent, come up with good stories and build their guys... i personally feel TNA has destoryed AJ... and he use to be the face of TNA...what we've got basically is former WWE guys running the place driving it into the ground trying to capture the fame they had in the last 20 years.

^ Hogan has appeared on TNA television twice in four months. He's currently not even with the company.

 

Ratings only went down.

 

He's not the problem with TNA.

TNA's problem is that the talent they have isn't any good.

 

 

TNA have been shedding their decent talent to pay these high salaries which aren't much good. Imagine if they paid that high salary to someone who would actually bring a sizable return on it. Right now they shed their good talent and also have no hogan so lose-lose.

 

I vote Austin for TNA.

Never gonna happen

 

Maybe not. I think Dixie just needs to ask daddy for enough money to make it happen. *IF* that was able to happen ratings would skyrocket and would suit Austin since he would only have to work the mic and not wrestle.

 

From listening to his podcast I reckon there is a slight chance he could be into a non-wrestling role.

Maybe not. I think Dixie just needs to ask daddy for enough money to make it happen. *IF* that was able to happen ratings would skyrocket and would suit Austin since he would only have to work the mic and not wrestle.

 

From listening to his podcast I reckon there is a slight chance he could be into a non-wrestling role.

 

But there is no chance he would do that non-wrestling role with TNA. If he went back in, it would be with WWE. 

He has no reason to, however, other than a single giant match (which would obviously be at WrestleMania). He made plenty of money and spent it wisely. He is making money in Hollywood. No reason to take what would be a pittance to him to go to TNA. Getting a huge Rock-like pile of money to wrestle one match at WM? Sure.

TNA's problem is that the talent they have isn't any good.

OK, I've gotta step in here. Despite all the cuts this year, TNA still has a good amount of top-level talent, whether they shine in the ring like Abyss, Manik, Hernandez, AJ Styles, Chris Sabin, Samoa Joe, or on the mic like Frankie Kazarian, Sting, James Storm, Bully Ray, or even everywhere like Christopher Daniels (in my opinion the best damn talker in the business, or "bi-zi-ness" as he would put it), Austin Aries, Bobby Roode, Kurt Angle.

 

We'll hopefully see that talent shine at Bound for Glory this Sunday. By the way, it's nice to see more people talking about TNA with BFG on the horizon, even if it's not that positive. :p I'll throw up the card and some predictions...

 

Pre-show - Chavo Guerrero and Hernandez vs. Bad Influence (Christopher Daniels and Kazarian) vs. Eric Young and Joseph Park vs. The BroMans (Jessie Godderz and Robbie E) - Tag team gauntlet match for a TNA World Tag Team Championship match later on in the night - I'm throwing my weight behind the Bad Influence once again becoming the world tag team champions of the world.
Bully Ray © vs. AJ Styles - No Disqualification match for the TNA World Heavyweight Championship - Got made a No DQ match via a tweet from Dixie Carter after Impact. Still, I'll go with AJ. Either the cavalry will come to save him or they'll have Hogan make a "shock" return to help him. Either way, Bound for Glory will likely be the beginning of the end for Bully; not the Aces and Eights obviously, that started crumbling a while ago.
James Storm and Gunner © vs. TBA - Tag team match for the TNA World Tag Team Championship
Manik © vs. Austin Aries vs. Chris Sabin vs. Jeff Hardy vs. Samoa Joe - Ultimate X match for the TNA X Division Championship - Hardy's first Ultimate X match, so they'll probably give him the belt.
Sting vs. Magnus - Singles match - Normally, I'd be cheering for the Brit, but it would be a bit weird seeing Magnus beat Sting, especially at TNA's top PPV.
Kurt Angle vs. Bobby Roode - Singles match - Angle's return to action, so this one's a no-brainer.
ODB © vs. Gail Kim vs. Brooke - Three-way match for the TNA Women's Knockout Championship - Gail and Brooke are (sort of) in cahoots, so as is the way with wrestling storylines, they'll probably spend half the match bickering and fighting each other, leaving ODB to sneak the pin on one of them (obviously after a few minutes of teaming up on ODB, of course).

Hello,

 

Booker had a short run in the WWE anyway - yea it worked good for the invasion and his KOTR win but after that..not much was done with him. Sting didn't deserve to get treated that way by Vince.. He'd constantly get stuck jobbing to lil guys plus hes got kids he wants to raise and TNA's lax schedule allows him to do that.

I beg to differ. They gave him titles and a match against Triple Kiss Ass......I mean Triple H. You cant ask, at Booker's level, for a better run than that (as short as it was)

 

Would have Sting been treaten like that by Vince? Honestly, we will never know.

 

OK, I've gotta step in here. Despite all the cuts this year, TNA still has a good amount of top-level talent, whether they shine in the ring like Abyss, Manik, Hernandez, AJ Styles, Chris Sabin, Samoa Joe, or on the mic like Frankie Kazarian, Sting, James Storm, Bully Ray, or even everywhere like Christopher Daniels (in my opinion the best damn talker in the business, or "bi-zi-ness" as he would put it), Austin Aries, Bobby Roode, Kurt Angle.

 

We'll hopefully see that talent shine at Bound for Glory this Sunday. By the way, it's nice to see more people talking about TNA with BFG on the horizon, even if it's not that positive. :p I'll throw up the card and some predictions...

 

Abyss? You mean Joseph Park? He's worthless in that role. Should have switched back years ago.

Manik - never seen anything that impressive.

Hernandez. He's big. Wow.

AJ Styles - Only AJ worth anything is AJ Lee.

Chris Sabin - Only relevant because he's been there forever. Also only reason he held the title.

Samoa Joe - Could be impressive if he lost some weight and got into shape.

Kazarian - Good talker.

Sting - been over it.

Storm - one of the impressive ones on the roster. WWE mid-card talent at least for sure.

Bully Ray - could probably go back to WWE whenever he wanted.

Daniels - never been impressed

Aries - would probably get a WWE contract due to his history with Punk and Bryan in ROH. 

Roode - the big talent, in my opinion. The one WWE would take.

Angle - not worth getting into.

 

So if TNA closed today, I see three people WWE should take. Storm, Aries, Roode. They would also probably take Sting, Ray, and Angle if they agreed to a contract. WWE has a huge roster and not enough space for everyone as it is, so they would only pick the cream of the crop.

Hello,

Abyss? You mean Joseph Park? He's worthless in that role. Should have switched back years ago.

Manik - never seen anything that impressive.

Hernandez. He's big. Wow.

AJ Styles - Only AJ worth anything is AJ Lee.

Chris Sabin - Only relevant because he's been there forever. Also only reason he held the title.

Samoa Joe - Could be impressive if he lost some weight and got into shape.

Kazarian - Good talker.

Sting - been over it.

Storm - one of the impressive ones on the roster. WWE mid-card talent at least for sure.

Bully Ray - could probably go back to WWE whenever he wanted.

Daniels - never been impressed

Aries - would probably get a WWE contract due to his history with Punk and Bryan in ROH. 

Roode - the big talent, in my opinion. The one WWE would take.

Angle - not worth getting into.

 

So if TNA closed today, I see three people WWE should take. Storm, Aries, Roode. They would also probably take Sting, Ray, and Angle if they agreed to a contract. WWE has a huge roster and not enough space for everyone as it is, so they would only pick the cream of the crop.

Just out of curiosity, who do you believe are the best currently in the WWE roster?

And your opnion please, not whats "best for business" :p

Hello,

Just out of curiosity, who do you believe are the best currently in the WWE roster?

And your opnion please, not whats "best for business" :p

 

The following people are better than anything on the TNA roster. Only including full timers.

 

Bryan

Punk

Cena (yes, Cena)

Sandow

Ziggler

Ambrose

Rollins

AJ Lee

Cesaro

Wyatt

Kane

Natalya

 

Now, if we did a 'who would you take' between the two companies, I don't think I would ever pick a same-level TNA guy over the WWE counterpart.

 

Not to mention the part timers in WWE and its NXT talent which also consists of a lot of guys better than what TNA has.

 

Heck, having seen Big E Langston in his NXT run, I think he has far more potential than anyone in TNA. I only don't have him on the list above because I can't say he is there right now. But if we were choosing teams, I would pick him before anyone in TNA.

The following people are better than anything on the TNA roster. Only including full timers.

 

Bryan

Punk

Cena (yes, Cena)

Sandow

Ziggler

Ambrose

Rollins

AJ Lee

Cesaro

Wyatt

Kane

Natalya

 

Now, if we did a 'who would you take' between the two companies, I don't think I would ever pick a same-level TNA guy over the WWE counterpart.

 

Not to mention the part timers in WWE and its NXT talent which also consists of a lot of guys better than what TNA has.

 

Heck, having seen Big E Langston in his NXT run, I think he has far more potential than anyone in TNA. I only don't have him on the list above because I can't say he is there right now. But if we were choosing teams, I would pick him before anyone in TNA.

 

Some of those i'd agree with (Wyatt?  You serious? haha).

 

But doesn't escape the fact there's no point having good talent if you shackle them with PG :(

Hello,

The following people are better than anything on the TNA roster. Only including full timers.

 

Bryan

Punk

Cena (yes, Cena)

Sandow

Ziggler

Ambrose

Rollins

AJ Lee

Cesaro

Wyatt

Kane

Natalya

 

Now, if we did a 'who would you take' between the two companies, I don't think I would ever pick a same-level TNA guy over the WWE counterpart.

 

Not to mention the part timers in WWE and its NXT talent which also consists of a lot of guys better than what TNA has.

 

Heck, having seen Big E Langston in his NXT run, I think he has far more potential than anyone in TNA. I only don't have him on the list above because I can't say he is there right now. But if we were choosing teams, I would pick him before anyone in TNA.

Could you state the reasons please, even though some are obvious....I wanted to do a direct comparision between why you said the TNA guys suck and why you think the WWE wrestlers are better.

Hello,

Could you state the reasons please, even though some are obvious....I wanted to do a direct comparision between why you said the TNA guys suck and why you think the WWE wrestlers are better.

 

Not going to put that much work into it. Most of the reasons are quite obvious, to anyone with eyes. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Can we not have paperless office, like we was promised in the 80's
    • I actually laughed out loud in real life at the heading on this—whatever Microsoft is drinking, I want some of it.
    • Euro-Office must default to ODF to be considered "genuinely European", LibreOffice argues by David Uzondu Euro-Office is a web-based collaborative office suite that positions itself as a "European sovereign alternative" to American tech companies, backed by a coalition of developers including Nextcloud, IONOS, Abilian, BTactic, OpenProject, and, more recently, Tuta. The project officially went live a couple of days ago, but not before drawing heavy fire from LibreOffice developers, who called the marketing claim that Euro-Office represents the "first open-source office suite developed in Europe" a deceptive historical inaccuracy because projects like OpenOffice and LibreOffice existed decades earlier. Now that the project has launched, LibreOffice is back with another complaint, arguing that Euro-Office cannot consider itself "genuinely European" while it pushes proprietary Microsoft defaults on users. Euro-Office had promised to improve the OpenDocument Format (ODF) back in April, but the current release still plagues users with several technical failures. For instance, the suite lacks an admin setting to enforce ODF, and mobile editors completely block ODF saves, forcing files into Microsoft's OOXML formats. Some configurations force files into read-only mode, while editing frequently corrupts document formatting or erases data. LibreOffice thinks that merely supporting a format as an afterthought does not make you a sovereign alternative, as file formats are the battleground where" digital sovereignty is won or lost." The road to the first stable release of Euro-Office has been quite bumpy due to an aggressive public fallout with OnlyOffice, from which the coalition originally forked the project. OnlyOffice struck back by accusing the coalition of violating copyright terms under its AGPLv3 branding requirements by stripping the original branding anyway and forking the code. Getting Euro-Office up and running is a bit wonky (at least for non-technical users), as there is no direct installer to grab off the web. The easiest way we learnt is by using Docker. First, pull the official Euro-Office image from the GitHub Container Registry: docker pull ghcr.io/euro-office/documentserver:latest Then, run the container with active ports and a secure JWT token, enabling the test environment: docker run -i -t -d -p 8080:80 --restart=always -e EXAMPLE_ENABLED=true -e JWT_SECRET=my_secure_jwt_secret ghcr.io/euro-office/documentserver:latest And finally, open a web browser and go to the following address: http://localhost:8080 If you are running this on a remote server, replace localhost with your server's IP address. You will see the Euro-Office test page, where you can create new text documents, spreadsheets, or presentations directly in the browser. Image via Euro-Office Nextcloud promises that proper standalone desktop versions and mobile apps will arrive in a future release.
    • It’s any of their products not just windows.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      197
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!