Recommended Posts

If Windows 7 uses less resources and fixes most of Vista's problems with some new added features... then it will be the best version of Windows ever! Otherwise it will suck.

The chances of lower resource usage: ZERO.

Resource usage doesn't necessarily matter, it's all in HOW they are used. Vista uses more RAM than XP, but it's also much smarter about it and in systems with enough RAM it's better than the XP method.

Vista uses more RAM than XP, but it's also much smarter about it and in systems with enough RAM it's better than the XP method.

Personally, I don't find a built in auto running indexer that reactivates itself on updates to be "smarter".

LOL, well, I remember in one of neowin's reports that it was to use less then vista in it's resources and yet do more. So hopefully they are learning something. Vista isn't that bad an OS, it is just they screwed up so bad with the PR campaign that people think it sucks. With a bit of work, it can be made into a great OS.

Edited by MaJoR

Problems with Vista:

Slow on older hardware - Expected Windows 7 solution, have heavily cut down versions of Windows 7

UAC - Expected Windows 7 solution, improve interface and other developers will be coding with it in mind anyway

Driver support - Expected Windows 7 solution, get the beta's out there and hope hw suppliers write for it earlier and better than vista

Remaining problems:

Are there any?

Problems with Vista:

Slow on older hardware - Expected Windows 7 solution, have heavily cut down versions of Windows 7

UAC - Expected Windows 7 solution, improve interface and other developers will be coding with it in mind anyway

Driver support - Expected Windows 7 solution, get the beta's out there and hope hw suppliers write for it earlier and better than vista

Remaining problems:

Are there any?

exactly, all the problems you give are things that have made people think twice about using vista but they are all things that microsoft can't really do much about. it's up to everyone else to fix them.

drivers for 7 will be pretty much the same as they are for vista so that won't be much of an issue and the hardware being sold will be good enough by the time 7 comes out.

Personally, I don't find a built in auto running indexer that reactivates itself on updates to be "smarter".

LOL, well, I remember in one of neowin's reports that it was to use less then vista in it's resources and yet do more. So hopefully they are learning something. Vista isn't that bad an OS, it is just they screwed up so bad with the PR campaign that people think it sucks. With a bit of work, it can be made into a great OS.

"LOL, well, I remember in one of neowin's reports that it was to use less then vista in it's resources and yet do more."

What?

"Personally, I don't find a built in auto running indexer that reactivates itself on updates to be "smarter"."

Why? It IS smarter, I can easily spend ten minutes searchign for a file in xp and it is instant in vista, the indexer is a GREAT feature. It indexes files almost as soon as they are added and really doesn't use NEARLY as much resources as people say.

Only reason Vista got as much heat as it did was because not-so smart, average users misinterpreted what their tech saavy friends told them during Vista's development stages and they all seemed to become "experts" around 2006/2007. It's funny how these ppl who don't know a damn thing about computers became gurus on Windows at Vista's release and soon after. The average user cannot turn on a computer but they're opinions on an OS hold water, go figure lol.

anyone else thinks the fanboys and childish people are slowly taking over the world as we know it?

Yep, and this place is a concentrated example of the world at large, only with a lot more geeks and dorks. Great, ain't it?

Well, you cant say if Windows 7 is going to suck.

But we dont need Vista. Why would i want to use an OS that is slower(look up any comparison benchmark), uses more resources(for instance i have less ram free for virtual machines, which i use often), and where i have to search first to find a feature? Well, only one reason left, the (useless) eyecandy. But if i really want the Vista theme, i could just use Windowblinds, or any of the thousands of .msstyles avialable.

No, XP with SP3 runs better than ever. I would choose speed and functionality over eyecandy any day :) But if Vista runs great for you, great :) Its just not for me. And yes, i have used Vista, i've had it installed for 3 months.

If Windows Seven is at least as fast as XP, and is using resources better, i might use it. If not, i'll stick to XP.

Edited by Srsly

I use Vista HP now, I like it, not as much as XP Professional SP2.

M$ should just release XP second edition, with rewritten code to fix serious problems and add enhanced features and new features.

Not so hard.

I would cough up ?100 for that.

Instead I coughed up ?65 for a non finished ops.

Well, you cant say if Windows 7 is going to suck.

But we dont need Vista. Why would i want to use an OS that is slower(look up any comparison benchmark), uses more resources(for instance i have less ram free for virtual machines, which i use often), and where i have to search first to find a feature? Well, only one reason left, the (useless) eyecandy. But if i really want the Vista theme, i could just use Windowblinds, or any of the thousands of .msstyles avialable.

No, XP with SP3 runs better than ever. I would choose speed and functionality over eyecandy any day :) But if Vista runs great for you, great :) Its just not for me. And yes, i have used Vista, i've had it installed for 3 months.

If Windows Seven is at least as fast as XP, and is using resources better, i might use it. If not, i'll stick to XP.

Actually recent benchmarks show the performance is largely exactly the same at least for gaming with matured drivers.

SO more accurately look up any old comparison benchmarks.

Edited by ViperAFK
Actually recent benchamrs show the performance is largely excatly the same at least for gaming with matured drivers.

SO more accurately look up any old comparison benchmarks.

Really? I didn't know that I might have to try it out later on with some games on steam.

Since Vista is pretty much the best (the sum of all pluses and negatives) operation system I ever used (and yes I have experience with osx and linux)... I don't believe windows 7 will suck at all.
I have a different viewpoint than you. I prefer Linux over Vista (don't have enough OSX time to have a valid opinion). Linux is best for me. However, I don't think that Vista "sucks", and I see no reason that 7 will "suck", either. They seem to be decent OSes, but they just don't suit me.

I think most of the "sucks" comments on Vista or 7 are coming from people that strongly prefer XP and don't like feeling pushed out of XP and into an upgrade path by the upcoming end of life announcements for XP.

I have a different viewpoint than you. I prefer Linux over Vista (don't have enough OSX time to have a valid opinion). Linux is best for me. However, I don't think that Vista "sucks", and I see no reason that 7 will "suck", either. They seem to be decent OSes, but they just don't suit me.

I think most of the "sucks" comments on Vista or 7 are coming from people that strongly prefer XP and don't like feeling pushed out of XP and into an upgrade path by the upcoming end of life announcements for XP.

I agree and thats a fair a valid statement Mark. I have used Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows 3.0 to Vista. I think that a fair a valid conclusion can only be reached until the product ships Gold. Even then there will be people who will find that their evangelism will fall upon deaf ears by just stating "This sucks or this OS rules" Not one OS will be the holy grail for everyone and having competition is the best way for all users to gain benefits rergardless of platform

M$ should just release XP second edition, with rewritten code to fix serious problems and add enhanced features and new features.

Not so hard.

I would cough up ?100 for that.

What do you think SP2 was? It did all this, except it was free.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!