Recommended Posts

@Yggdrasilly: I didn't mean adding the blocks :p Because for that kind of a shellstyle it shouldn't be in there. It looks better without that part in it. I made a mockup yesterday where the bar would go from the light blue to the darker blue but that didn't look so nice.

Oh, I know. I was just playing around, trying to see if there was anything 'nicer' I could do with it. I was actually trying out a bar that was... Dark, like the right end of the caption bar, then transitioned to another, darker, blue. It looked pretty good, except for the stretching. :laugh:

Oh.. and another thing. Watercolor Emico: Black is done and will be sent out to the testers later today. A release can be expected tomorrow. Maybe even today if I'm in a good mood :p

This is great news! :) I can't wait!

@StarLion: That looks cool! I've got a "Userpicture" frame for a "Vista-ish" start panel that I could give you.

It would also be cool if you'd make a wallpaper from the background that you've used in that logon screen.

Here's the background, I did it all in vector so I went ahead and rendered it out stupidly large (2560x1600). Should I go ahead and make the concept into a working login screen, or throw together a few different variations first? I've got something more akin to the default XP login screen in mind that might look nice as well.

post-201195-1213888138_thumb.png

Here we go, tweaked the login screen to fall more in line with the default XP look. As a whole, I kinda like this version better than the previous one...but at the same time there are parts of the previous one I like, so I'm going to take one more stab at it and see if I can find some sort of happy medium between the two styles.

post-201195-1213893635_thumb.png

^I think that the blocks should look as sharp as the captionbars. Same counts for the the userpicture frames.

@ViperAFK: Woah, thanks for the comment! :D

Edited by Capric0rn

Edit: Do you mean the shine on the blocks? I tried making those sharper and it didn't look so hot, it caused the screen to look very cluttered and visually "noisy". Softening the shine on the background blocks killed this effect and popped the user interface back to the surface (I can show you a screenshot with the sharp shine, but it's not pretty).

As for the shine on the userpicture blocks/frames, I just left it there as a placeholder, when the login screen is actually in use the centers of those blocks will get covered by each user's userimage overlay.

Edited by StarLion

Once you decide which logon screen you want to release, I'll give it the colors that it should have for the Blue version.

About the blocks; you should give them a full gradient instead of the gradient it has right now. It kinda looks weird and with the gradient it'll fit the background a bit better IMO.

That login screen looks really good! I have one suggestion though. I wonder if the default Windows XP flag and logo could be switched out for the "Watercolor" versions? I don't know if you have a bigger version of the 'startbutton' flag that you used, Capric0rn, but that might fit, along with text like: 'Windows XP Watercolor Edition' or something like that?

Just an idea.

It's too bad I use the login window. I might have to switch back just to use this!

^I was thinking way ahead of you, I was already thinking about making a bigger version for logon screens and maybe even wallpapers :p

@acies: I've got the same feeling. I don't know what it is either but it just feels weird.

@StarLion: Could you show us a version without the shadows on the blocks and with the blocks having a full gradient? :)

Once you decide which logon screen you want to release...

I was thinking, how about releasing both logon screens (after the first one is polished up to match the second one)? The first one I made for Modern, and the second one to go with Classic?Just an idea, but if I had to pick only one, I would have to go with the second version.

I'll give it the colors that it should have for the Blue version.

The base colors used to make the logon screen were taken directly from your skin, it already matches...

About the blocks; you should give them a full gradient instead of the gradient it has right now. It kinda looks weird and with the gradient it'll fit the background a bit better IMO.

Which blocks exactly, the userpicture frames you just gave me or the background blocks?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One reason it might be running hotter is dust build up within the cooling or perhaps the paste has dried out. You could always try repasting your old GPU and cleaning the cooler. Your experience in Linux will be much better with an AMD GPU; the performance in gaming is much closer to Windows than nVidia would be. I personally think on Windows, AMD drivers are junk.
    • I reviewed it back in March, but I didn't have a 5070 at the time https://www.neowin.net/reviews/amd-rx-9070-review-vs-rtx-5070-4070-and-rx-9070-xt-7800-xt--just-good-enough/ When I reviewed the 9070 I did have a 5070 to compare it against, so the scores are there for the 9070 XT. it outperforms the 5070 in raster, and is barely neck and neck in Ray Tracing. So it's better than a 5070 in everything but Ray Tracing where it is neck and neck, or just under. To be honest, the uplift from 3080 when it was new to the 9070 XT is not as great a step up. If you can find a used 4080 Super for around the same money, you would probably be better off, but if you only want to buy new then the 16GB 9070 XT is the best value for money in its category.
    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!