Recommended Posts

This film is so overrated, so overhyped.

I've know seen it 2 nights in a row. The first time I thought it was ok, but the second, well I'm not gonna watch it again.

It's a 12A, and that completely ruins it for me, Batman is such a dark character, and the Joker is so sadistic that this film can not be given justice with a 12A.

Oh, and since when could a man fall 60 stories, land on a car and be fine?

It's a 12A, and that completely ruins it for me, Batman is such a dark character, and the Joker is so sadistic that this film can not be given justice with a 12A.

While I kind of agree I don't think it ruins it. And there was alot of controversy about it getting a 12A, as in it should have gotten a higher rating. And it is pretty damn dark in some areas. But I do think it's Hollywood that won't let them make an R rated version. Which is a pitty.

Oh, and since when could a man fall 60 stories, land on a car and be fine?

I don't think you understood what happened there. I saw it as, his cape(which is basically a parachute/glider thing) slowed the fall and the suit helped brake the impact some. That's what I got from it anyway.

This film is so overrated, so overhyped.

I've know seen it 2 nights in a row. The first time I thought it was ok, but the second, well I'm not gonna watch it again.

It's a 12A, and that completely ruins it for me, Batman is such a dark character, and the Joker is so sadistic that this film can not be given justice with a 12A.

Oh, and since when could a man fall 60 stories, land on a car and be fine?

he is the batman

Well, i only give this movie 7/10, whereas i give the Michael Keaton batman movie 8/10

The reason for this is simple, they screwed up a few crucial things;

1. WTF did they do to the batmobile, it looks like its designed by a 5yo using crappy old hummer parts

2. Heath Ledger was great, no arguement there, but THE JOKER, the clue is in the name, he is should be more humorous.

3. The love interest isnt nearly sexy enough to compete with previous batman love interests.

4. WTF did they do with Batmans voice, that was just annoying.

Such a shame they screwed up in a few basic areas, otherwise i can see this getting 9/10, but due to the simple screw up, can only give it 7/10.

Shame.

Well, i only give this movie 7/10, whereas i give the Michael Keaton batman movie 8/10

The reason for this is simple, they screwed up a few crucial things;

1. WTF did they do to the batmobile, it looks like its designed by a 5yo using crappy old hummer parts

2. Heath Ledger was great, no arguement there, but THE JOKER, the clue is in the name, he is should be more humorous.

3. The love interest isnt nearly sexy enough to compete with previous batman love interests.

4. WTF did they do with Batmans voice, that was just annoying.

Such a shame they screwed up in a few basic areas, otherwise i can see this getting 9/10, but due to the simple screw up, can only give it 7/10.

Shame.

1. You obviously didn't watch Batman Begins.

2. You obviously don't know the direction Nolan is taking with the Batman series. Plus the Joker was funny, in a sadistic kind of way ("Tada! It's.... gone!")

3. I thought Kim Basinger was unattractive as hell.

4. Half of it was good ("WHERE ARE THEY?!"), some not so ("I don't wear hockey pants/pads").

Burton's Batman hasn't aged well. I watched it recently and couldn't believe how bad the plotting was. I used to love this movie. And if you want to talk about accuracies, how about having the Joker kill Bruce's parents? How about Batman actually killing people?

Burton's Batman hasn't aged well. I watched it recently and couldn't believe how bad the plotting was. I used to love this movie. And if you want to talk about accuracies, how about having the Joker kill Bruce's parents? How about Batman actually killing people?

Funny you say that as I watched Tim Burton's Batman last night - i've always loved that film and was always cynical of Batman Begins until I watched it again a month ago (and really loved it).

I couldn't believe how cheesy and dated the previous Batman looked though. It was almost bordering on the original 60's/70's Adam West Batman in some places simply because Nolan's Batman upped the tempo and the severity of the character.

I still love Tim Burton's Batman movies but it was a bit of a shock watching them now having grown used to the new ones.

Well, i only give this movie 7/10, whereas i give the Michael Keaton batman movie 8/10

The reason for this is simple, they screwed up a few crucial things;

1. WTF did they do to the batmobile, it looks like its designed by a 5yo using crappy old hummer parts

2. Heath Ledger was great, no arguement there, but THE JOKER, the clue is in the name, he is should be more humorous.

3. The love interest isnt nearly sexy enough to compete with previous batman love interests.

4. WTF did they do with Batmans voice, that was just annoying.

Such a shame they screwed up in a few basic areas, otherwise i can see this getting 9/10, but due to the simple screw up, can only give it 7/10.

Shame.

1. The "batmobile" isn't supposed to be an attractive super car. It's a military vehicle that never went into full production.Watch Batman Begins.

2. Well I found him very funny....

3. This line of thought doesn't make any sense. Why does his love interest have to have supermodel looks?

3. This line of thought doesn't make any sense. Why does his love interest have to have supermodel looks?

That's my biggest gripe with some people saying how ugly Maggie is. If Wayne knew that girl from a young age, she most likely will look like a normal woman. Not supermodel like. What's the problem with people growing up to not look like a hottie.

1. I like Maggie, she's a woman in that subtle way that doesn't have to be overly flashy or show lots of skin

maggie_gyllenhaal.jpg

2. Bale's digitally enhanced voiced was creepy at some parts, but his voice was a little...overdone

3. I personally liked the Batmobile and thought it looked much more of the "character" versus the hotrod style of previous movies.

P.S. Saw it in IMAX...*drool*

1. I like Maggie, she's a woman in that subtle way that doesn't have to be overly flashy or show lots of skin

maggie_gyllenhaal.jpg

2. Bale's digitally enhanced voiced was creepy at some parts, but his voice was a little...overdone

3. I personally liked the Batmobile and thought it looked much more of the "character" versus the hotrod style of previous movies.

P.S. Saw it in IMAX...*drool*

I concur. His voice was a bit overdone, I agree. And I, too, liked the Batmobile.

The film was rubbish. The only good part was Heath Ledger as the Joker, which he played fantastically.

Batman was rubbish, voice was so overdone in bass that you couldn't actually hear what he was saying (down to a rubbish sound system at the Odeon) and the whole storyline was messed up. Nothing fitted in and it could've been so much better. Traditional Batman lines like *boom voice* "Let her go" */boom voice* made the film cheesy. Film was too long. 3/10.

The Joker made the movie worth seeing. Top performance. I just wish there was more 'Joker' in the movie.

Two Face: :sleep: Dumb idea, overcooked IMHO.

Batman: :boo: How silly was that mobile thing tech, plus Batman became less believable.

Otherwise the movie was too long, needs an edit and the story / scenes jumped about too much.

7/10 (most of that score goes to Heath Ledger for his excellent acting as The Joker).

3. The love interest isnt nearly sexy enough to compete with previous batman love interests.

4. WTF did they do with Batmans voice, that was just annoying.

+1 Totally agree there.

And yeah, Batmans voice was more of a growl than a voice. Meh. Not impressed with that.

Also what was with the Scarecrow?! The mask looked wrong and why was he wearing it if he didn't use the 'gas' or whatever, then also how was the Scarecrow relevant?! Just showed up and never mentioned again.

I went to see it last Sunday, absolutely fantastic :woot: I loved every minute of it :happy: I'm looking forward to picking it up on Blu-Ray :) I actually watched Batman Begins (on Blu-Ray) the night before I saw the Dark Knight as a quick refresher :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!