Recommended Posts

This film is so overrated, so overhyped.

I've know seen it 2 nights in a row. The first time I thought it was ok, but the second, well I'm not gonna watch it again.

It's a 12A, and that completely ruins it for me, Batman is such a dark character, and the Joker is so sadistic that this film can not be given justice with a 12A.

Oh, and since when could a man fall 60 stories, land on a car and be fine?

It's a 12A, and that completely ruins it for me, Batman is such a dark character, and the Joker is so sadistic that this film can not be given justice with a 12A.

While I kind of agree I don't think it ruins it. And there was alot of controversy about it getting a 12A, as in it should have gotten a higher rating. And it is pretty damn dark in some areas. But I do think it's Hollywood that won't let them make an R rated version. Which is a pitty.

Oh, and since when could a man fall 60 stories, land on a car and be fine?

I don't think you understood what happened there. I saw it as, his cape(which is basically a parachute/glider thing) slowed the fall and the suit helped brake the impact some. That's what I got from it anyway.

This film is so overrated, so overhyped.

I've know seen it 2 nights in a row. The first time I thought it was ok, but the second, well I'm not gonna watch it again.

It's a 12A, and that completely ruins it for me, Batman is such a dark character, and the Joker is so sadistic that this film can not be given justice with a 12A.

Oh, and since when could a man fall 60 stories, land on a car and be fine?

he is the batman

Well, i only give this movie 7/10, whereas i give the Michael Keaton batman movie 8/10

The reason for this is simple, they screwed up a few crucial things;

1. WTF did they do to the batmobile, it looks like its designed by a 5yo using crappy old hummer parts

2. Heath Ledger was great, no arguement there, but THE JOKER, the clue is in the name, he is should be more humorous.

3. The love interest isnt nearly sexy enough to compete with previous batman love interests.

4. WTF did they do with Batmans voice, that was just annoying.

Such a shame they screwed up in a few basic areas, otherwise i can see this getting 9/10, but due to the simple screw up, can only give it 7/10.

Shame.

Well, i only give this movie 7/10, whereas i give the Michael Keaton batman movie 8/10

The reason for this is simple, they screwed up a few crucial things;

1. WTF did they do to the batmobile, it looks like its designed by a 5yo using crappy old hummer parts

2. Heath Ledger was great, no arguement there, but THE JOKER, the clue is in the name, he is should be more humorous.

3. The love interest isnt nearly sexy enough to compete with previous batman love interests.

4. WTF did they do with Batmans voice, that was just annoying.

Such a shame they screwed up in a few basic areas, otherwise i can see this getting 9/10, but due to the simple screw up, can only give it 7/10.

Shame.

1. You obviously didn't watch Batman Begins.

2. You obviously don't know the direction Nolan is taking with the Batman series. Plus the Joker was funny, in a sadistic kind of way ("Tada! It's.... gone!")

3. I thought Kim Basinger was unattractive as hell.

4. Half of it was good ("WHERE ARE THEY?!"), some not so ("I don't wear hockey pants/pads").

Burton's Batman hasn't aged well. I watched it recently and couldn't believe how bad the plotting was. I used to love this movie. And if you want to talk about accuracies, how about having the Joker kill Bruce's parents? How about Batman actually killing people?

Burton's Batman hasn't aged well. I watched it recently and couldn't believe how bad the plotting was. I used to love this movie. And if you want to talk about accuracies, how about having the Joker kill Bruce's parents? How about Batman actually killing people?

Funny you say that as I watched Tim Burton's Batman last night - i've always loved that film and was always cynical of Batman Begins until I watched it again a month ago (and really loved it).

I couldn't believe how cheesy and dated the previous Batman looked though. It was almost bordering on the original 60's/70's Adam West Batman in some places simply because Nolan's Batman upped the tempo and the severity of the character.

I still love Tim Burton's Batman movies but it was a bit of a shock watching them now having grown used to the new ones.

Well, i only give this movie 7/10, whereas i give the Michael Keaton batman movie 8/10

The reason for this is simple, they screwed up a few crucial things;

1. WTF did they do to the batmobile, it looks like its designed by a 5yo using crappy old hummer parts

2. Heath Ledger was great, no arguement there, but THE JOKER, the clue is in the name, he is should be more humorous.

3. The love interest isnt nearly sexy enough to compete with previous batman love interests.

4. WTF did they do with Batmans voice, that was just annoying.

Such a shame they screwed up in a few basic areas, otherwise i can see this getting 9/10, but due to the simple screw up, can only give it 7/10.

Shame.

1. The "batmobile" isn't supposed to be an attractive super car. It's a military vehicle that never went into full production.Watch Batman Begins.

2. Well I found him very funny....

3. This line of thought doesn't make any sense. Why does his love interest have to have supermodel looks?

3. This line of thought doesn't make any sense. Why does his love interest have to have supermodel looks?

That's my biggest gripe with some people saying how ugly Maggie is. If Wayne knew that girl from a young age, she most likely will look like a normal woman. Not supermodel like. What's the problem with people growing up to not look like a hottie.

1. I like Maggie, she's a woman in that subtle way that doesn't have to be overly flashy or show lots of skin

maggie_gyllenhaal.jpg

2. Bale's digitally enhanced voiced was creepy at some parts, but his voice was a little...overdone

3. I personally liked the Batmobile and thought it looked much more of the "character" versus the hotrod style of previous movies.

P.S. Saw it in IMAX...*drool*

1. I like Maggie, she's a woman in that subtle way that doesn't have to be overly flashy or show lots of skin

maggie_gyllenhaal.jpg

2. Bale's digitally enhanced voiced was creepy at some parts, but his voice was a little...overdone

3. I personally liked the Batmobile and thought it looked much more of the "character" versus the hotrod style of previous movies.

P.S. Saw it in IMAX...*drool*

I concur. His voice was a bit overdone, I agree. And I, too, liked the Batmobile.

The film was rubbish. The only good part was Heath Ledger as the Joker, which he played fantastically.

Batman was rubbish, voice was so overdone in bass that you couldn't actually hear what he was saying (down to a rubbish sound system at the Odeon) and the whole storyline was messed up. Nothing fitted in and it could've been so much better. Traditional Batman lines like *boom voice* "Let her go" */boom voice* made the film cheesy. Film was too long. 3/10.

The Joker made the movie worth seeing. Top performance. I just wish there was more 'Joker' in the movie.

Two Face: :sleep: Dumb idea, overcooked IMHO.

Batman: :boo: How silly was that mobile thing tech, plus Batman became less believable.

Otherwise the movie was too long, needs an edit and the story / scenes jumped about too much.

7/10 (most of that score goes to Heath Ledger for his excellent acting as The Joker).

3. The love interest isnt nearly sexy enough to compete with previous batman love interests.

4. WTF did they do with Batmans voice, that was just annoying.

+1 Totally agree there.

And yeah, Batmans voice was more of a growl than a voice. Meh. Not impressed with that.

Also what was with the Scarecrow?! The mask looked wrong and why was he wearing it if he didn't use the 'gas' or whatever, then also how was the Scarecrow relevant?! Just showed up and never mentioned again.

I went to see it last Sunday, absolutely fantastic :woot: I loved every minute of it :happy: I'm looking forward to picking it up on Blu-Ray :) I actually watched Batman Begins (on Blu-Ray) the night before I saw the Dark Knight as a quick refresher :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft released Windows 11 KB5094149 / KB5095971 / KB5094156 Setup, Recovery updates by Sayan Sen Earlier this week Microsoft released its newest Patch Tuesday updates (KB5094126 / KB5093998 on Windows 11 and KB5094127 on Windows 10). Alongside those, Microsoft also released new dynamic updates. These Dynamic Update packages are meant to be applied to existing Windows images prior to their deployment. Dynamic Updates also help preserve Language Pack (LP) and Features on Demand (FODs) content during the upgrade process. VBScript, for example, is currently an FOD on Windows 11 24H2. This time both recovery and setup updates were released for Windows 11 as well as Windows 10. The company writes: "KB5095185: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 11, version 26H1: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.28000.2269. KB5094149: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 11, versions 24H2 and 25H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.26100.8655 KB5095971: Setup Dynamic Update for Windows 11, version 23H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to Windows setup binaries or any files that setup uses for feature updates in Windows 11, version 23H2. KB5094156: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 11, version 23H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.22621.7219 KB5098815: Windows Recovery Environment update for Windows 10, version 21H2 and 22H2: June 9, 2026 This update automatically applies Safe OS Dynamic Update (KB5094154) to the Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE) on a running PC. The update installs improvements to Windows recovery features. KB5094154: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 10, versions 21H2 and 22H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.19041.7417. KB5094153: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 10, version 1809 and Windows Server 2019: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.17763.8880. KB5094152: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 10, version 1607 and Windows Server 2016: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.14393.9234." Microsoft notes that both the Recovery and Setup updates will be downloaded and installed automatically via the Windows Update channel.
    • Quantum Error Correction Validated in Nature: Microsoft and Quantinuum Log 800-Fold Improvement Two years after the original press-release announcement, independently peer-reviewed results published in Nature on June 10, 2026, have confirmed that Microsoft and Quantinuum achieved an 800-fold reduction in quantum error rates on real trapped-ion hardware — the largest gap between physical and logical error rates ever independently validated.    What Quantum Error Correction Actually Does — and Why Breaking Even Is Hard https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318329/20260613/quantum-error-correction-validated-nature-microsoft-quantinuum-log-800-fold-improvement.htm   Quantum Computing Wiring Bottleneck Cracked by HKU Silicon Carbide Chip at Qubit Temperature Engineers at the University of Hong Kong have built the first cryogenic control chip that operates at the same temperature as superconducting qubits — 10 millikelvin, or just one-hundredth of a degree above absolute zero — without generating the heat that has forced every competing approach to park its electronics hundreds of meters of cable away. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318325/20260613/quantum-computing-wiring-bottleneck-cracked-hku-silicon-carbide-chip-qubit-temperature.htm  
    • RevPDF 4.5.0 by Razvan Serea RevPDF is a free, fully offline PDF editor for Windows, macOS, and Linux that lets you edit text and images directly inside PDF files — no internet connection, no account, and no cloud uploads required. Unlike bloated alternatives that demand subscriptions and constant connectivity, RevPDF fits in under 60MB on desktop while delivering a complete editing toolkit: annotate, redact, sign, compress, split, merge, convert, and reorganize pages, all processed locally on your device. Smart font matching ensures edited text blends seamlessly with the original, and multi-language support includes RTL scripts such as Arabic and Hebrew. Where most PDF editors force you to choose between features and simplicity, RevPDF manages both. You can build interactive forms from scratch with text fields, checkboxes, and dropdowns, permanently redact sensitive data before sharing, draw freehand on contracts and diagrams, and add custom watermarks — all without a single file leaving your machine. Edit Text and Images Directly Inside PDFs RevPDF supports true inline PDF editing — not just annotation layers on top of a document, but actual modification of existing text and images within the file. A smart font-matching engine identifies the font used in the original document and applies it automatically when you make edits, so changes blend naturally with the surrounding content. You can reposition elements, resize images, and update text across single pages or entire documents. RevPDF 4.5.0 release notes: This is one of the biggest updates to RevPDF yet. A lot of things people have been asking for are finally here. New Features Auto Redaction Permanently redact sensitive text and areas from your PDFs before sharing. Clean, irreversible, and fully offline. Comments, Links & Bookmarks Add comments for review, insert clickable links, and create bookmarks to jump around long documents without scrolling forever. Find & Replace Search across the whole document and replace text in one go. Long overdue. Split Pages Vertically or Horizontally Split any page down the middle, vertically or horizontally. Perfect for scanned books or double-page spreads. New Drawing Tools More tools for freehand drawing and markup, better for annotations, sketches, and detailed notes. Continuous Scrolling in Editor The editor now scrolls continuously through pages instead of jumping between them. Working through long documents is a lot smoother now. PDF Metadata Editor View and edit the metadata stored inside your PDFs, including title, author, subject, and keywords. Better Font Matching Text edits now blend in more naturally by doing a better job of matching the original font. Tabbed PDF Viewer Open multiple PDFs at once in tabs and switch between them without going back to the home screen. Add Links Insert hyperlinks anywhere in your PDF, to external URLs or to other pages within the document. Share & Print Shortcuts Share or print directly from the editing screen, home screen, and viewer. No extra steps. Minor Updates Paste images directly from clipboard into your PDF New image editing tools for more control over images inside documents Bug Fixes Fixed file saving issues on Windows and Linux Everything still works fully offline. No login, no cloud, no account. Your files stay on your device. Download: RevPDF 4.5.0 | 58.0 MB (Open Source) Links: RevPDF Home Page | Github | Screenshots 1 | 2 Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Interesting. I'm not using a VPN with my phone. I tried though my home internet (Rogers) and my cellular internet (Telus) using their respective DNS servers and both trigger the dialog above.
    • Three days after Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 as the most capable AI model it had ever released to the public, the United States government ordered it switched off — and now the company is refunding customers who paid to use a product that vanished almost overnight https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318342/20260613/us-government-pulls-anthropics-fable-5-offline-now-come-refunds-vanished-ai.htm  
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      139
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      91
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!