Emo and goth to be made illegal in Russia


Recommended Posts

As well they should be, both are liable to make children retarded and demean the our species as a whole.

On second thought I read that there is a high risk of suicide related to both groups. I say roll on douchebags, survival of the fittest. As long as you're not breeding go ahead with your make-up wearing self.

this is just a media stunt for making a $ selling sh*t and keep the masses distracted from the real problems of the world.

Haven?t you noticed that from time to time some event is "associated" by the media to some pseudo-cult, first was MTV, then its was the Video Games, now there are EMO's, its just a way to sell you crap and keep you distracted from the REAL problems.

Exactly. In the same way that people in this thread have the right to listen to whatever they want to, and dress how they like.

I really cannot believe the attitudes of some people in this thread. I'm not going to point out individuals, however, if you don't want to look at somebody, nobody's forcing you. If you don't want to take notice of what they look like, nobody's forcing you.

Just because somebody doesn't look like/dress like/listen to the same music as you, it doesn't mean it's wrong.

Exactly, my dad had a strong stereotypical view of my daughters boyfriend and friends till he actually met them face to face and found out you should never judge a book by it's cover. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Skin tight trousers have been around long before most of you people here, my dad wore than in the 50's /60's and I wore then in the 80's, they were unbelievably tight and if they had even a tiny tiny little bit you could pull we'd refuse to wear them calling them baggy :|

Exactly, my dad had a strong stereotypical view of my daughters boyfriend and friends till he actually met them face to face and found out you should never judge a book by it's cover. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Skin tight trousers have been around long before most of you people here, my dad wore than in the 50's /60's and I wore then in the 80's, they were unbelievably tight and if they had even a tiny tiny little bit you could pull we'd refuse to wear them calling them baggy :|

What made him change his mind about him?

I thought they went away in the 70's. :)

I thought so too once.. oh yes.. they still lurk around in the deepest darkest mukiest areas of the society we live in today. Of course this is best illustrated by Eric cartman as you can find hippies in your attic, in your walls, etc. lmao.

I grew up with lots of goth friends and none of them were whiny or suicidal. Most of them "look" the way they did because they were angry at the world, not themselves, and/or did it to rebel against parents or normal standards of beauty in society. And by the "world" I mean government, or corrupt elements of society, or whatever was bothering them. It was a way to express themselves and make a statement through personal tastes. The music was always meant to be spooky, haunting, or whatever dark description can provide and not self loathing. Besides goth is just a stupid label anyway. I mean think about it; does the Cure sound like Marylin Manson? No, but the media would tell you that they're both goth. That is why the stereotyping is really garbage.

It's just like the media made out all raves to be drug-fests in the early 90's, which is a total crap. I used to be a "raver" and have seen more drugs at a concert-hall seeing smashing pumpkins than I ever saw at a rave. And I went to raves every weekend for a few years in the 90's.

It's all fictitious crap spewed by the media that way too many people consume.

Don't Believe the Hype.

Edited by dysmatik
What about my right not to have to see people that look like complete tools?
That's not a right. That's your judgement/perception.
There is not a fashion trend in the past 100 years that looks so stupid.

Again your judgement and perception. If it bother's you that much look the other way.

I say we put a stop to it not only so the rest of society doesn't have to look at them, but for their own good as well :p

You come off awfully ignorant, and selfish, almost like a prick! Do you realize that?

This is not fair at all.

They should ban all ugly, depressed and scruffy people.

What about those overly happy people too? they make me sick. :x

My point is, you shouldn't be able to outlaw how people feel and express themselves, unless it cause physical dangers to others. And don't give me bull**** about "pain and suffering" or "emotional distress".... Hell I've had people that upset me in the past because of their attitude and treatment of others. That doesn't mean its right for me to control them.

Oh boo hoo my ex dumped me. It upsets me to look at her, throw her in jail or make the government steal her rights in the name of my "rights".

Edited by Cierro
Exactly. In the same way that people in this thread have the right to listen to whatever they want to, and dress how they like.

I really cannot believe the attitudes of some people in this thread. I'm not going to point out individuals, however, if you don't want to look at somebody, nobody's forcing you. If you don't want to take notice of what they look like, nobody's forcing you.

Just because somebody doesn't look like/dress like/listen to the same music as you, it doesn't mean it's wrong.

Well Said. Also +1 for gigapixels post. It's astonishing how many close minded people have showed up in this thread. I don't like jocks (few exceptions) but it shouldn't be up to me or even the government if they are outlawed. IMO, that's just wrong!

The ignorance and arrogance and the sheer stupidity by the majority of the people in here makes me sick to the stomach. You know who you are. If you are against everything that is melancholy and dark, don't ever read shakespeare.

Those who label themselves as goths or emos chose to do so, because it is right for them. It does not matter if they're confused teenagers who have not yet found their place and meaning in this world or not. As long as they do not run around hurting other people, they have all the right to proceed as they wish (within the law).

All those of you who judge them for what they are (humans) must feel like you are a god yourself. It's quite honestly sickening. Why didn't this topic get closed yet?

What if your government would ban HipHop look, Skateboarders or whatever subculture you are part of? Does not seem right, now does it? You guys need to think for once! :(

All those close-minded people annoy me as hell.

Where's the ban on THEM?

Oh snap, now your arguments start to sting back on YOU.

Glassed Silver:mac

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!