New Gamers' Hangout Policy


Recommended Posts

Good... I may now create a post on witch PS3 or X360 would be better for ME without start the WWIII.

If you're gonna do that, try and give as many details as possible... Lack of details is usually what causes WW as people decide to start making your decision for you. Can't blame them in one sense if someone is giving no details, but in another sense it's usually proud owners of a console telling you to get it over the other because they would.

Tell everyone what games you like, what genres, what previous consoles you owned, what you're looking forward to in the future and if you want to do anything besides playing games on your console, ect.

Why?

Because if you just start a topic that says "360 or PS3", even with the new rules your topic will still hit 5 pages and go around in circles. As I said above it will become "What do I want NienorGT to buy?" as opposed to "Here's some advice for NienorGT to make up his own mind".

:laugh:

That's my new phrase for this week (not for use on the forums, I just mean in spoken word) :p

But yeah, correctly said.

Free speech has gone no where, and if you believe what you're about to say could get you banned/in trouble, it's nothing to do with free speech it's to do with either

a) Clear breaking of the NW rules - You agreed to use this forum under the rules NW specifies when agreeing to the T&C's

and/or

b) Saying what you want to say in a derogatory manner

Both of which do not need to be done to enjoy freedom of speech (Y)

Spot on matey!

I agree with these new rules! Should make the place a better area to visit/post in.

You can't do that in a democracy, either. I believe the legal term is "slander".

You do realize that slander is extremely hard to prove, correct? Hardly any slander suits go anywhere. I don't think I've ever seen a single post on Neowin that would amount to slander.

Back to the original post...

"Do not respond to somebody that has called you out by name. Report the post and be done with it. Responding to such a post can result in disciplinary action against you as well as the member you reported."

I'm not sure I understand this. Are you just emphasizing the 'report trolling, flame bait, etc' stance? Because what's wrong with responding to someone who disagrees with your opinion? I'm all for stopping the never ending arguments that go nowhere, but I don't see a problem with responding to someone who wants to debate something maturely with you.

You do realize that slander is extremely hard to prove, correct? Hardly any slander suits go anywhere. I don't think I've ever seen a single post on Neowin that would amount to slander.

Well that would be because any posts on Neowin would be libel rather than slander as it's in written form :p

I'm not sure I understand this. Are you just emphasizing the 'report trolling, flame bait, etc' stance? Because what's wrong with responding to someone who disagrees with your opinion? I'm all for stopping the never ending arguments that go nowhere, but I don't see a problem with responding to someone who wants to debate something maturely with you.

I believe that might be in relation to what happened earlier in this topic where a member speculated on me and Popisdead being suspended.

Larry said this won't be accepted on the boards, therefore I think what that point relates to is reporting people calling out others by name in relation to speculated incidents/bannings.

Instead of jumping in and replying yourself to deny/confirm/speculate, report the post instead.

These matters of moderation are private between the moderators/members in question. Not for the board to discuss between themselves.

At least that's what I think it means anyway. I seriously doubt it means not replying to someone who has challenged your opinion.

Yeah, let me clear this up.

Audioboxer and Munky are both indeed right.

When I say no calling another member out by name, I mean there is no need to use another members name in your post in any way that can be viewed as negative, that is all. It also does include not speculating on if another member has been restricted or not, etc. That is really no ones business except the persons.

Basically, No need to say a persons name in any negative light.

You disagree with what they are saying, quote them, and respectfully discuss why you disagree with what they are saying.

Posts like "<insert member name here> you are a moron" or "earlier in this thread <insert member name here> would not let things go" are along the lines of what we mean.

Truth be told, you want to call a member out, quote them, that is what most normal members do. :p

Truth be told, you want to call a member out, quote them, that is what most normal members do. :p

We have those???

Like you said many times before DL, if a post is offensive or against the rules in any other way, report and move one, no need to fan the flames.

Well that would be because any posts on Neowin would be libel rather than slander as it's in written form :p

FYI: All defamation cases are referred to the same thing in court in the United States. "Slander" isn't even tried in America... it's just tried under the same defamation torts. There's no separate section for slander.

@ Audioboxer, Munky and Larry: Ah, gotcha, thanks for the clarification :) Didn't see those posts.

FYI: All defamation cases are referred to the same thing in court in the United States. "Slander" isn't even tried in America... it's just tried under the same defamation torts. There's no separate section for slander.

@ Audioboxer, Munky and Larry: Ah, gotcha, thanks for the clarification :) Didn't see those posts.

Slander and libel differ only in the medium used to communicate, so it makes sense to try under the same defamation Law. Still, pedantically, written text is libel, not slander :p

If you're gonna do that, try and give as many details as possible... Lack of details is usually what causes WW as people decide to start making your decision for you. Can't blame them in one sense if someone is giving no details, but in another sense it's usually proud owners of a console telling you to get it over the other because they would.

Tell everyone what games you like, what genres, what previous consoles you owned, what you're looking forward to in the future and if you want to do anything besides playing games on your console, ect.

Why?

Because if you just start a topic that says "360 or PS3", even with the new rules your topic will still hit 5 pages and go around in circles. As I said above it will become "What do I want NienorGT to buy?" as opposed to "Here's some advice for NienorGT to make up his own mind".

Yep sure, I hate when people make threads like "ATi or nVIDIA" and "Intel vs AMD". Such threads easily make problems, yet they are nothing near what I saw here in Gamers Hangout.

I'm happy to see stuff getting sorted because in the end, Fanboism and Trolling is just as worst as Spamming and other stuff.

Yep sure, I hate when people make threads like "ATi or nVIDIA" and "Intel vs AMD". Such threads easily make problems, yet they are nothing near what I saw here in Gamers Hangout.

I'm happy to see stuff getting sorted because in the end, Fanboism and Trolling is just as worst as Spamming and other stuff.

That's also partially because a quick flashing of an Intel CPU vs. AMD CPU review, or an NVIDIA 9800GTX vs. ATI HD 4850 benchmark solves a lot of potential problems. :p

With Hardware Hangout, a lot of the "debates" if you would call it are a lot more one sided, and in general most of the members there get a long very well with each other.

That's also partially because a quick flashing of an Intel CPU vs. AMD CPU review, or an NVIDIA 9800GTX vs. ATI HD 4850 benchmark solves a lot of potential problems. :p

With Hardware Hangout, a lot of the "debates" if you would call it are a lot more one sided, and in general most of the members there get a long very well with each other.

Very true.

You can't really argue with a benchmark(s) showing how fast/how well each performs. I mean you can bring in bang for buck and some other factors, but if something in the hardware world performs faster/better than a competing product, it's really as simple as that at times.

In the GH there is no real benchmark to go up against with many things, unless it's metacritics/review scores - However they are totally opinion, not "fact" like a benchmark of genuinely* similar hardware to show which runs better.

That can be what causes a lot of the fuss/arguments in the GH. Since there isn't really any underlying conclusion/answer, opinions fire off left right and center, and if people get out of hand, those opinions quickly turn into arguments, then rule breaking.

It's like saying the "360 is better than the PS3", and saying (vague example cause im rusty in the hardware world :p) the "New ATI card is better than the new Nvidia card".

While the later will still have some people moaning it's "not", or they still prefer Nvidia, if there is benchmarks on various websites showing it is, well, it really is. Unlike in the 360/PS3 scenario, where the "answer" if you want to call it to that statement, is never right, nor is it never wrong - Because it's a complete opinion based off nothing more than your likes/dislikes.

Which is why in the gamers hangout if you're ever going to make a statement like the above, you really have to give a bit more reasoning/opinion to be taken seriously than just entering a topic and saying "360 is better" or "PS3 is better". In the HWH I'm sure if the first post shows "hardware a" trashing "hardware b" in a benchmark, while your post may still seem a bit pointless to some, coming in and saying "hardware a is better" is going to go down a lot more civilly than doing it in the 360/PS3 scenario.

* I say genuinely similar hardware in relation to CPU/GFX cards, as people will try to face off the PS3/360 fairly often on raw specs, which as we know is a merry-go-round scenario with no real answer. Well the games are the answer of how good the hardware is, but last time I checked they're still being made and improved on weekly/daily/yearly.

Edited by Audioboxer
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 by Razvan Serea Helium is a private, fast, and honest Chromium-based web browser — built for people, with love. It offers the best privacy by default, unbiased ad-blocking, and a clean experience free from bloat and noise. Proudly based on Ungoogled-Chromium, Helium removes Google’s clutter while keeping a fast, efficient development pipeline. With thoughtful touches like native !bangs and split view, Helium is a people-first, fully open-source browser that puts control back in your hands. Privacy, security, and control come first. Ads, trackers, and third-party cookies are blocked automatically, HTTPS is enforced everywhere, and all Chromium extensions work seamlessly — while Google can’t track your activity. Helium’s 13,000+ offline-ready !bangs let you jump straight to sites or AI tools like ChatGPT instantly. Open-source, people-first, and unbiased, Helium delivers a browsing experience that’s fast, secure, and free from noise, ads, and compromises. Helium Browser key features: Performance Fast, efficient, and lightweight — built on Chromium’s optimized engine. Energy-saving and consistent — stays fast over time without slowing down. No bloat — stripped of unnecessary components for maximum speed. Minimalist interface — compact, clean, and distraction-free. Customizable toolbar — hide elements you don’t need. Smooth and stable — no flicker, lag, or animation glitches. Comfort-focused experience — intuitive and unobtrusive. Privacy & Security Best privacy by default — blocks ads, trackers, phishing, and third-party cookies. Unbiased ad-blocking — powered by community filters and uBlock Origin. No telemetry or analytics — zero background web requests on first launch. Strict HTTPS enforcement — warns for insecure sites. Passkeys supported — modern authentication made simple. No built-in password manager or cloud sync — your data stays yours. Extension Compatibility Full Chromium extension support — including MV2 extensions. Anonymized Chrome Web Store requests — Google can’t track extension installs. Extended MV2 support — maintained for as long as possible. Smart Features Native !bangs — browse faster using 13,000+ offline-ready shortcuts. AI integration — use !chatgpt and others directly from the address bar. Offline functionality — bangs work without an Internet connection. Philosophy People-first design — open source, transparent, and community-driven. No ads, no noise, no bias — privacy and honesty over profit. Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 changelog: 0a4f1149 revision: bump to 4 (#1969) 4848de1f helium/core: enable the chromium screenshot feature (#1968) e0dec3f5 onboarding: integrate strings to i18n system (#1948) 417fa5bc i18n: fix newline parsing for onboarding 7a339b39 i18n: add foraged translations for onboarding 4f090cff i18n/generate: add handling for onboarding strings bfe48d58 i18n_apply: manually override parent grd logic for onboarding strings ab214e3c onboarding: bump in deps, wire up grdp afa6a059 helium/core: disable pdf infobar feature (#1965) eba585e7 helium/ui/vertical: fix new tab button alignment and icon size (#1964) 6ecfc9e0 helium/ui/tabs: fix horizontal tab hover background color (#1963) 3db87dc0 helium/ui/tabs: fix new tab button hover/press colors (#1962) 6bbdcc3e helium/ui: improve tab group UI in all layouts (#1961) 53deb314 helium/ui/tabs: enable tab group hover cards e93aece7 helium/ui/vertical: fix tab group appearance, prevent line overlap 629f5495 helium/ui/tabs: restore solid group header colors, enable new colors 961c962e helium/ui/tabs: move horiz tab group underline to bottom, make it thick c96deab6 merge: update to chromium 149.0.7827.155 (#1959) 36db56b4 i18n: update source.gen.json 5ce006ae patches: refresh for chromium 149.0.7827.155 b4c1ea62 merge: update ungoogled-chromium to 149.0.7827.155 4e5e8671 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.155 08a3e7da helium/ui/layout: disable mute on collapsed vertical tabs (#1778) a0a5bbaf helium/core: simplify context menu and prevent huge widths (#1951) c4732aac devutils/i18n: add forage command (#1944) 11d16986 devutils/i18n: add an option to translate using local CLI tools (#1942) d820c3a2 i18n/prompt: tighten translation rules to prevent common errors (#1940) cf827007 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.114 6e3d5164 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.102 Download: Helium 64-bit | Portable 64-bit |~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Helium ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: Helium Home Page | macOS | Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!