... 2 years in prison for killing cat


Recommended Posts

If someone has the stomach to kill and watch an animal suffer he/she will most likely to have it in them to kill a human too. I would just put him in prison for 50+years... out of sight out of mind. Why let some sick son of a bitch walk free?

He needs help. Is he crazy? Hell yea he is. He needs help not tax money wasted in prison. You cant lock up all the crazy's because well it is impossible and it will not help the victims or even the crazy people.

Most people that say "2 years in prison is a little harsh for just killing a cat" obviously have never had an animal to bond with and look after. An animal becomes part of your family, its not "just a pet". Its just as much a part of the family as anyone else could be.

If someone has the stomach to kill and watch an animal suffer he/she will most likely to have it in them to kill a human too. I would just put him in prison for 50+years... out of sight out of mind. Why let some sick son of a bitch walk free?

Again, what about the people that hunt? Thats a pretty weak comparison. Just cause someone can kill an animal doesnt mean they'll kill a human. Theres people that wouldnt hurt a fly but then end up killing a human.

He needs help. Is he crazy? Hell yea he is. He needs help not tax money wasted in prison. You cant lock up all the crazy's because well it is impossible and it will not help the victims or even the crazy people.

They have hospital wards in prison. They even have special prisons for the criminally insane.

People that hunt are just as bad as far as i am concerned. Unless you have a reason of either protecting you and your family or as a matter of survival then killing any animal is f*cked.

Hunting for sport is hardly the same thing as killing for pure pleasure. Hunters are not motivated by sadistic tendencies. (not that I support hunting)

OOOOOOOOOOOooooo I'm sorry!! I didnt know the whole world revolved around north america and europe!!! Theres other countries around the world that dont get the same type of 'luxury' that we do! Silly me! It's cheaper to hunt your own duck or deer than buying it anyways. Where do you think Walmart gets their meat? Some magical beans?

:rolleyes: It's already been covered that replying with that is twisting my words around. It's clear in the terms of this thread what I meant and it's annoying to have anyone simply come and turn the thread/quote into something else which would be more appropriate for a hunting thread...not a cat killing thread.

There is a difference between killing things for fun or simply out of maliciousness (which is what this person did)and killing something for food. I do not condone hunting or fishing for sport/fun.

You said that "Abusing/killing animals should be a felony".

Now, you failed to use a proper conjunction, but I read that as an or. Maybe you meant and.

But even so, you are suggesting that a felony should be based on some definition of what would be considered abusing an animal.

Now, maybe this doesn't represent your opinion, but I know there are people who consider just about all domestication of animals abuse. That includes domestication of pets and farm animals, which are, in fact, the very hunks of meat that end up on mine and your plates.

So, I'm just looking for clarification: as a person who randomly and emotionally wants to elevate crimes to a felonious level, what exactly do you consider animal abuse?

There's a difference between killing an animal for food and killing an animal for fun (Or the silly "because we can" justification) , we've been over this, twisting words around doesn't change it, or the meaning of the original post.

I don't have any problem with killing an animal for food (I love hot dogs and bacon for example), but I have a serious problem with killing an animal just because somebody thinks it's fun.

There's a difference between killing an animal for food and killing an animal for fun (Or the silly "because we can" justification) , we've been over this, twisting words around doesn't change it, or the meaning of the original post.

I don't have any problem with killing an animal for food (I love hot dogs and bacon for example), but I have a serious problem with killing an animal just because somebody thinks it's fun.

so what justifies killing it just because it's delicious?

you know, everytime a thread liek this gets posted, out come the anti-hunters. I really hope one day you get your wish about no hunting, and they somhow also ban the wildlife association form killing animals to cull them. that way when your out walking in the woods you either a) get killed by a crazed deer, b) get gored by a wild boar, or hell, even c) a psyco squirrel kills you. You dumbasses need to realize that hunting is also done for a reason, and this reason is to cull wildlife. I hunt all the time, and fish also, and I have never once ever thought, or ever cared if the "fish got hurt" or if the "deer felt pain" I enjoy fresh fish, and I also enjoy wild game. if you have a problem with anythign I have said here, keep your opinions to yourself, as I really could care less to read it. No one is going to ever change your mind. Neowin needs to ban articals like this as all it does is start ****.

Killing a dog or a cat for fun, IS killing something that cannot defend it self. If i ever see someone doing this, believe you me, that person will never be able to speak of what happened to him.

And, I am not against hunting and so on, but there are differences.

And I will not argue on my opinions, but i will take down the person that i see kicking/stepping on/hitting/otherwise hurting/killing a innocent animal just for fun. And with anyone's god as witness, i will take the time that comes to me.

Abusing/killing animals should be a felony in all states. It's wrong and sick.

while i agree it's wrong and sick, our jails and prisons are EXTREMELY overcrowded (causing inmates to be released early) and waste millions in tax payer money each year

this guy needs to get fined, maybe sent to a shrink, but definitely not prison

whilst in a perfect world he could go to jail and be reformed, we dimply can't sustain our legal system the way it is currently and we need a major overhaul. mainly keeping low level crimes like this (and smoking weed) out of prison to make room for the serious offenders

It's someones pet. To some people that's like killing their child - so he should be jailed!

Well, in the US prisons are overcrowded, so maybe they should just give them the same treatment as they gave the animal?

If death is the result, so be it :p

Soz if im re-iterating whats been said but, I would imagine he got 3yrs not for killing the cat but for the mental and physical horror that he put his Gf through. Not only that but many people who take that kind of frustation out on animals go on to take them out on cwomen and children. I.e those weaker then they.

He posed a danger to her and himself, not to mention what he did from an animals rights point of you. Clearly hes a sick ****** and 3yrs seems about right. No doubt out in 12-18months.

Oh c'mon, it's just a cat. Farm animals like cows and pigs get slaughtered everyday. What makes it different than a cat? Better yet, what makes it different than killing the cat? The end result is the same. Cow = dead/on dinner plate. Cat = dead/six feet under. Should people that kill animals for food be put in prison? No. The hypocrisy in this thread is incalculable. What should be focused on is the fact that killing animals can sometimes lead to killing people. That man should be in a mental hospital under high security instead of being in jail.

Don't think of me as a heartless person. I enjoy having animals as pets. In fact, I have a small kitten that I take care of. If someone were to kill my kitten, I'd be very angry but certainly not angry enough to make someone waste x number of years (of their life) in jail. I'd much rather sue the person.

Think of the bigger picture. Think of big game hunters killing animals, think of veterinary euthanasia, think of where all the meat comes from in the supermarket, and lastly... think of that burger/chicken wing you ate last night. That's right, somebody murdered a cow or chicken so that you may eat it.

I ask you this... where can the line be drawn?

If someone has the stomach to kill and watch an animal suffer he/she will most likely to have it in them to kill a human too. I would just put him in prison for 50+years... out of sight out of mind. Why let some sick son of a bitch walk free?

You're kinda being radical here with this assumption, you can't go on and say stuff like that.

And his "real" crime is threatening to kill the human, not killing an animal.

People should be realistic and stop kidding themselves, it's a cat, fact is, it's not someone's child, and if that "someone' thinks it is, he's the one should be behind bars, in an asylum or something.

I think everyone agrees here that he had to be punished - but some of you are high or something, because you value an animal's life more than you value a humans', that's sick.

Again - he deserves it for the threatening he did - but not for killing a stupid cat, god forbid you're all saints here, are you now ?

That's right, somebody murdered a cow or chicken so that you may eat it.

THE PROBLEM is that this person were not going to eat it (nor would he have to, because most of us live in a part of the world were there is food in stores, and we have money to buy it, most of us at least,so i don't judge asians for eating cats and dogs, it's their culture). This guy killed the cat to punish his girlfriend after an argument.

I believe that his 2 year sentence is due to that he used this as a sick method of punishing his girlfriend, and then told the woman's daughter that he would kill her.

You cannot put this case side by side with the meat in your pizza, since the ONLY reason for him to kill the innocent cat, was to scare/punish his girlfriend.

If this was your cat, and your "better half" that did it, you would surly be glad to see him go to jail.

People should be realistic and stop kidding themselves, it's a cat, fact is, it's not someone's child, and if that "someone' thinks it is, he's the one should be behind bars, in an asylum or something.

Well, so if it wasn't for the threatening, you think he just should be let go? There is something really wrong with a person that kills a cat over an argument with it's owner, you cannot argue with that. Even if he didn't threaten the woman/woman's daughter, he should still be punished, at least with a big fine, or with shrink hours.

And, many lonely people think of their cat as their child, or something at least equal, and that's whats keep them alive. There is nothing wrong with this, except if you have like 50 cats and cannot take care of them.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!